Statement from the Candidate

In 2010 I ran an unsuccessful campaign for the United States Congress, but I'm still posting blogs that I believe express an opinion that most other people miss, and that I also believe can make America great again and cast off the yoke of liberal/progressive control that is currently in place.

Thursday, June 21, 2018

Which Is Worse: “Toxic Masculinity” Or Toxic Progressive Liberalism?

It seems that every few years liberal  Democrats, who generally live nice, comfortable lives, have to find something to complain about, and this time their subject for attack is men.

Back in the 1970s liberals claimed that there was no difference between boys and girls, and that the nature of each sex could be manipulated by these brilliant leftists. So they made boys play with dolls and had girls play with GI Jane army toys. It soon developed, however,  that the boys were simulating fights with their dolls and the girls were hugging their GI Jane toys and putting them to bed in a rocking crib after serving them tea and cookies.

But then the heavens exploded, and in 1996 Time magazine came out with an issue that stated that “Boys and Girls Are Different”! Liberals thought that this difference between male and female was a revolutionary idea and it actually surprised them.

So now, fully into the 21at Century, we are having to live this nightmare all over again as feminist liberals frame the argument that “Toxic Masculinity’ is the destruction of our society and must be brought under control, and that men must be made more like women. One believes that they are confusing criminal males with civilized males and assume that the civilized ones are no better than the criminal ones. No one would argue that males are more aggressive than females, but the males who become criminals are usually captured and imprisoned, and by whom are they imprisoned?  Mainly by the more civilized males.

Only in modern times when we have a machine to perform or at least help with nearly any household or employment task, could women complain about the masculinity of men. Two hundred years ago, before machines and computerization, men and women played distinctly differing roles in society and the differences between the sexes made a big difference in the lives and the survival of families, and of society in general.

Given the choice, I would state that Toxic Progressive Liberalism is the worst thing that could happen to society, just as Liberal Privilege is proving itself to be destructive in the lives of patriotic Americans. There’s nothing particularly toxic about masculinity, just as there’s nothing toxic about femininity, and it’s a shame that some boys are being harmed by being given drugs for what’s been diagnosed as being ADD, with the danger that the drugs will shape their future development into something that nature never intended; so in this sense those liberals who try to take the “toxic” edge off of masculinity are just making the situation worse and more harmful than if they just left it alone and let nature take its course.

And the liberal idea of toxic masculinity is redounding to the detriment of girls and women, because the idiotic, liberal, self-identity movement is allowing boys to compete in sports against girls, and the girls are being beaten by the stronger, faster boys.  Feminists have no one but themselves to blame for this horrible development, which can be very upsetting for young women who have trained hard and long to develop a superior skill at an athletic endeavor, only to have a boy come along and beat them. It’s not fair, but feminists have yet to be introduced to the idea of fairness; all they care about is winning, defeating and dominating their fellow citizens, all of which descriptors are sort of masculine attributes, are they not? But one dare not call feminists “toxic” creatures, even when they take on masculine practices and tendencies. And they now have fifty-eight gender self-identities to compete with, following the asinine presidency of Barack Obama and his intent to “fundamentally transform America”, which is exactly what the physical, athletic competition between men and women is part and parcel of. So the field of competition gets more crowded, more frustrating and more disappointing all the time, but feminists will never admit that their grandmothers were probably more satisfied with their lot in life because their lives were led without a need to assign nasty names to men and to try to defeat and humiliate men all the time.

One feels sorry for liberals, even the feminist ones: They consistently preach political crap that is contrary to common sense and contrary to nature, and then wonder what happened when they get side-swiped, run into a figurative ditch and end up unhappy and seeking a subject to blame for their unhappiness.

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

The Liberal Press Either Spikes Real News, Or Floods Us With Fake News

One will recall a couple of weeks ago when the leftist press flooded the news reports, from coast to coast, with photos of  immigrant children reportedly being held in concentration camp conditions by the evil Trump administration. Every leftist news report  in the nation was abusing Donald Trump for the horrible way he was treating immigrant children, until someone discovered that the photos of immigrant children in cages were made during the Obama administration, and the pictures suddenly disappeared and related reports ceased immediately.

Ignored in the media flurry over the treatment of immigrant children is the fact that liberals celebrate the harvesting of body parts from babies that Planned Parenthood aborts, but remembering this aspect of liberal life doesn’t serve the ends of the anti-Trump crowd. To end the lives of babies for profit is acceptable, but keeping a weeping mother from her child, temporarily and in the hands of official government employees, because the mother has broken an American law, is beyond the pale to liberals. And added to this unfortunate fact, the whole truth is that American Democrats are working with Central American and Mexican leftists to continue or even increase the flow of children, many of whom are released by their parents to travel to the United States on their own, because all other news in America is in President Trump’s favor, and Democrats need this immigration issue in order to have something to attack Trump with. They’re that desperate for an issue.

Then, more recently, the hate-Trump press noticed the long-established policy of removing children from control of any adult accompanying them in their travel north, in case the child is being delivered to or by a sex-trafficker, and again Trump became a Satan for splitting up families. But there’s been no recognition on the part of the press that Trump is only following the law as written and implemented by Congress, and is doing the same thing that the Obama administration did.

If you pay attention you can also observe a very clever trick as the leftist press generates its weekly marching orders and publishes the latest anti-Trump screed that will flow simultaneously from every left-wing publication and broadcast. The best example of this liberal practice was during the Bush administration when the word “gravitas” was suddenly used one Sunday morning to mock the assembly of people that George Bush had selected to make up his administration, except for Dick Cheney who had more “gravitas” than the other members, and who Bush had announced as his Vice Presidential running mate. Rush Limbaugh recorded a hilarious montage of leftist personalities using the word gravitas, which had never before in living memory been used in a political sense, but was now the order-of-the-day for Democrats.

Liberals are nasty people, and the leftist members of the press misuse the constitution of the United States by spiking good news about President Trump and repeatedly reporting only negative, Fake News about the Trump administration

Sunday, June 17, 2018

The FBI Gives A New Meaning To The Principle Of “Double Jeopardy”

Back before the 2016 presidential election, the FBI agent who oversaw the Hillary email investigation was also in charge of the initial Trump collusion investigation, and he found there to be “no there, there” related to a problem with Russia, and this finding was in spite of the express desire of the investigator to keep Trump out of the White House.

Nevertheless, after Trump became president, the collusion charges were reinstated and a special counsel was appointed to retrace old grounds. But after an additional year of investigations by the special counsel there has still been no evidence of a Trump/Russia collusion, and we know that the leftist charge of evasion of justice for the firing of James Comey is a complete crock of crap.

Leftists in government have created a new form of double jeopardy exclusively for Donald Trump: if they can’t find him guilty once, on charges on which they want to indict him, they’ll hand the investigation off to another form of prosecution and start the same old investigation all over again. Isn’t there a prohibition against double jeopardy in our constitution?

This unconstitutional persecution of a president that the main-line, Washington, liberal establishment doesn’t like, and the overlapping denial to the American voter of his and her elected presidential representative, must halt, immediately.

Saturday, June 16, 2018

“We’ll Stop Him”

With these words, written by Peter Strzok, the lead FBI investigator for the Hillary email investigation and the Donald Trump presidential “we’ll stop him” campaign, this FBI employee assured his FBI pals that Donald Trump would never be elected to the White House and would never serve as president. One is reminded that all of the power of the federal government was applied to keep Trump out of the White House, but all of the money in the world could not keep the Amercian citizens from voting for the correct, patriotic person to be president.

The IG report released last Thursday demonstrated to Americans the problem our nation has with a top-level plot against the man we elected president, and we deeply resent it.

Even though the IG report stated that there was no biased effort “in writing” found to keep Trump out of the White House, we all know that there was an effort “in deed” to keep him out and to get him out at even this late date, and this effort must be punished.

Friday, June 15, 2018

Is It Starbucks Or The FBI?

The news has lately been full of established American institutions that have gone rogue and done things that they not only should not have done, but that are wrong in the deeds themselves for having been done. Here’s a little quiz to see if you can tell the difference between two of the most noteworthy newsmakers:

Which major US organization is having to send all of its employees to sensitivity training so they’ll behave appropriately with those it typically deals with? Starbucks or the FBI?

Which major US organization has been found to be replete and overflowing with virulent, partisan, leftist employees? Starbucks or the FBI?

Unfortunately both the FBI and Starbucks are answerable to the above charges. The problem is that we all knew that Starbucks was a freaky, leftist place to visit, so most of us were able to avoid it most of the time. But the FBI is the only national law enforcement agency we have, and we’ve just confirmed that it cannot be trusted to impartially investigate people involved in the national political scene, and that they always stack the deck against the anti-swamp, conservative party under suspicion. In fact Starbucks is more trustworthy than the FBI because they don’t pretend and claim to be impartial and don’t repeatedly remind us that they’re Republicans appointed by a Republican president and are therefore dependable to treat conservative suspects fairly.  We know going in that Starbucks is a radical-left organization, but the FBI is supposed to be a fair and impartial government body concerned only with enforcing the constitution and the law

What was especially angering about the little TV chat given Thursday by Christopher Wray, the Director of the FBI, at the release of the IG report on the Hillary Clinton email scandal and its investigation by the FBI, was that Mr. Wray spent time, and any time at all would be too much time, listing for the audience all of the good things the FBI has done lately, like rounding up some bad guys, and saving a few lives and locking up bank robbers, which is exactly what they’re supposed to do and what they’re bring paid to do, when the IG report listed a great many bad things that he didn’t seem to be bothered with and chose not to discuss.

And Mr. Wray’s demeanor didn’t seem to be outraged with the illegal and improper things his agents did to let Hillary slip through their fingers, while trying to nail Donald Trump onto a cross as punishment for things for which there is no evidence of his guilt at all.

One’s anger at the FBI has only been renewed and not mollified by the IG report, because I’m certain that it is an incomplete, negotiated report and is letting many bad people continue to disserve the nation with their partisan behavior, and these same culprits are quite satisfied that they are in the right in their hate of President Trump.

The Obama administration brought this great nation unlimited, illegal immigrants, a horrible Iran nuke deal, unconstitutional healthcare, a nuclear North Korea, as corrupt IRS, a weakened military, as ISIS crisis, and now we find he gave us a leftist FBI. Why does this great nation deserve this kind of bad treatment?

We can thank our lucky stars that Donald Trump is occupying the Oval Office or there would be no knowledge of the current governmental corruption and the dire situation in the DC Swamp.

Monday, June 11, 2018

One Grows Weary Of Robert De Niro

Potty mouth talk may be amusing and cute the first or even the second time it’s tried, but Robert De Niro is on the third or fourth round of vulgarly, abusing President Trump in public settings, and someone close to him should tell him to tone it down, or at least use a little intelligence and some real, meaningful words to tell us what he dislikes about President Trump.

After Donald Trump defeated Hillary for the presidency in 2016, the shock was so great that many leftists repeatedly used the “F” word against their new president. Unfortunately, given the times in which we live, this kind of edgy  public talk is expected and discounted when uttered by the likes of De Niro and his leftist pals. But the American citizens who voted for Trump and put him in the White House are delighted with his performance in office so far, and we’re tired of listening to these disappointed, spoiled Hollywood people who are used to making fantastic salaries, being feted constantly and getting their way in everything they do, operate in a deranged manner in their fog of disbelief that they lost the 2016 election. For the past year we have just turned them and their nasty mouths off and have gone about the business of our lives while continuing our support of President Trump and the miraculous things he‘s done. But it’s time the left grew up and joined us in the 21st Century, and it‘s time they behaved in a civil, decent way.

So now it’s been over a year since Trump became president, and still the most enlightened, meaningful statement De Niro can make is “f**k Trump”? The man demeans himself and weakens his legitimate opposition to Trump with these continued juvenile statements. One can give him a little slack because his audiences usually express delight when he utters his profanities, but he’s a grown man and should be able to control his mouth at least part of the time. But it begins to appear that without a script and a director to guide Mr. De Niro, he really has nothing to say of interest, and nothing of substance in his mind.

The strange thing is that the more the left abuses and mistreats President Trump, the more his supporters are reinforced in their support of him. So one supposes it would be good for the future of America if fools like De Niro continued to express themselves and their leftist frustration in the basest of ways, but one hopes that eventually our fellow-citizens on the left will join us Trump supporters in a real and sincere discussion of policy and stop the ultra-left attacks and lies they’re spreading about Trump. Democrats used to be valuable fellow citizens and patriotic political opponents, but since 2016 they have just become mean, vile, hateful rogues.

Maybe poor old Robert is just offsetting ED on-set and getting his jollies by uttering dirty words in front of adoring audiences in Hollywood and New York, but for the sake of the nation and in the interest of adult discourse, he really should be encouraged to take a different tack and express himself in an intelligent, adult manner. His audiences are doing him no favor by encouraging his bad-boy misbehavior.

But in addition to Robert De Niro, one grows increasingly weary of everyone on the left, politicians, CNN and Hollywood alike, who are so immature and juvenile that they can’t take a little disappointment once in a while, and that they can’t reflect on the absolutely wonderful, positive things that Donald Trump has presented to the nation after only 500 days in office, and stop their bitching.

Sunday, June 10, 2018

Warming/Change Is Dead, So When Can Conservatives Say: “We Told You So”?

Climate change, global warming, whatever you want to call it, was one of the dumbest, most obvious, money-snatching and power-grab schemes in human history. There was never any evidence or proof of long-lasting warming of the planet, nor was the relationship between people living well and the globe getting warmer evident or even provable by alarmists. All they wanted was for America to suffer and live less well, and give money to poorer countries led by dictators who would not allow their citizens to improve their lives by allowing capitalism to be practiced in their nations.

In America the warming/change thing was a political movement that made the most radical predictions of the end of life on earth by flipping back and forth between automobiles causing warming, then claiming that the warming caused extreme cooling; then they claimed that air conditioner caused floods, and then droughts. Of course the solution to this problem, that America was responsible for, was for Americans to give up all the things our advanced nation has developed and become used to. But all of this clap-trap ended when Donald Trump became president and saved our nation from the Paris Accords which would have doomed us if it had proceeded as the United Nations designed it.

The warming/change movement was never based on science but rather was based on a computer program that predicted the exact most disastrous things the left could think of, and then produced the results they designed, wanted and intended. This politicization of weather was ridden like a lame horse by the radical leftists and the liberal press.

But on September 18, 2017, The Telegraph produced an article that showed the scientific mal- or misfeasance of the leftist by reporting problems with things like “carbon 14 dating” data, and “CO2 uptake not (being) as predicted”, all of which was to say that they were wrong. So with the passing of the corrupt Obama administration, the real facts are coming out and the lies are being admitted to and reversed.

Along the same lines of how much corruption America would have had if Hillary had become president and the lies and crimes of the FBI and the DOJ had not been exposed by the Trump administration, one may also wonder whether we would have ever heard of these environmental second thoughts and reversals in the warming/change scheme if Hillary had won the 2016 election. She would probably be overseeing an inundation of corporate environmental regulations, designed, of course, to save the planet, that would seriously obstruct and weaken America’s industries, the unemployment rate would be even higher than Obama’s record-setting trend, and the Democrats would be forcing carbon taxes on Americans and giving the money to the rulers of Haiti, Somalia, Cuba and North Korea for the nasty way America has treated these unfortunate nations the last 200 years.

The environmental movement was always clearly an anti-capitalist and anti-American effort to milk money from Americans and divert it to leftist, non-democratic interests. And since the admission that the scheme was always a lie was first produced nine months ago, I think it’s about time to spread the word more broadly and get this anti-American movement buried for good.