Statement from the Candidate

In 2010 I ran an unsuccessful campaign for the United States Congress, but I'm still posting blogs that I believe express an opinion that most other people miss, and that I also believe can make America great again and cast off the yoke of liberal/progressive control that is currently in place.

Sunday, February 25, 2018

Attention Young Democrats: Capitalism Is Not A Form Of Government, But Communism Is

One hears a report that the Chinese Communists think America should learn from their example and ban guns in our society. If we really wanted lessons from China we’d begin running military tanks over young demonstrators (look up Tiananmen Square for a picture of how the Chinese treat young people they disagree with and want to silence) and outlawing news reports that we don’t want to be exposed to the world, but Chinese lies are not the issue here. Instead it’s the innocence, and dare I say it, the willful stupidity, of too many young Americans who believe the anti-American crap  being spread about life in this nation.

In the current atmosphere of societal and governmental ignorance on the part of many high school and college students, and fearing that American youth will agree with the lying Communist Chinese,  today’s youth should know that the Chinese Communists ban weapons from their population because they are absolute dictators and they fear an uprising from the Chinese population if people had the ability to defend themselves and oppose the rulers of the Chinese totalitarian rule.

Young people should also know that Communism is a form of government that controls the population of the nation practicing it, completely and absolutely, and it also dictates economic practices for the nation, whereas the United States has a less centralized federal form of government with a Constitution that assures our citizens, among numerous other things, the freedom of speech and the right of possession of self-defense weapons, and our Capitalist economic system assures that iPhones, central heating for our homes, freedom of travel and internet access can exist amidst general economic prosperity.

When a government controls a nation’s economy, the population living in that nation live unpleasant and often miserable lives. Even the few people living in the United Sates who earn little relative income, live comfortable lives, so one should be smart enough to let their eyes and intelligence  be their guide as to where they’d rather live and which nation allows its citizens to live the best lives.

As one travels around the world one sees people in third world, impoverished countries who work for poverty wages and yet give abundant evidence that they are highly intelligent, bright people who, if they were living in the United States, would be employed in high paying jobs. But since they live in a backward, non-democratic, non-capitalist or often Socialist nation they are not employed at the level of their ability and therefore have limited income and no expectation of their situation improving.

Americans are freer than any other nation because we have a constitution that assures our people a free press, free speech, and the right to possess self-defense weapons, and our population is wealthier because our government allows capitalism to flourish to the benefit of everyone.  Americans must be very careful that the liberal political leanings of the last 40-or-so years do not destroy the wealth and freedom we have had for over 200 years. Most of the world is poor and live unpleasant lives, and we’ll join that unfortunate majority if we don’t protect the rights assured by our constitution.

Friday, February 23, 2018

Liberals Are Once Again Given A Pass

Now we know why Deputy Attorney General  Rod Rosenstein didn’t use sterner words in his announcement last Friday of Russian citizens being under indictment for influencing and trying to disrupt the 2016 election. Since President Trump is the assumed culprit for anything the Mueller investigation team discovers that Russia does, we expected serious finger-pointing at Trump and his team, but the charges as described by Rosenstein were muted.

The reason for his down-playing the Russian involvement in American elections is that CNN, MSNBC, the Democrat party, and even an individual American citizen in the form of Michael Moore, were identified as falling for the Russian schemes to upset our elections and sow displeasure among the American populace with future elections. It was disclosed that CNN and MSNBC happily announced on their cable programs where the anti-Trump demonstrations were to be held, and sent out reporters to let the world know how unified the demonstrators were and how they hated Donald Trump, and all of this was planned and coordinated by the Russian president, Vladimir Putin. In fact, any thinking, knowledgeable person who has paid attention to international affairs the last 70 or so years would not be surprised at Russian involvement in disrupting an American election. But Democrats, who have expressed only admiration for the Soviet Union and Russia and defended them vehemently in the 1980s as Ronald Reagan and other American conservatives made the case exposing Russia’s murderous, dictatorial methods of ruling the eastern block and explained why they should be opposed with all military and economic tools available at our disposal, loved the lie of Communism.

So with Washington establishment liberals in the media to blame for the disruptions and demonstrations that occasionally got violent, burned buildings and often got people hurt, our Mr. Rosen was crossing T’s and dotting I’s while covering for his liberal establishment pals, but he still would not give an inch on the accusation of Donald Trump as being the most evil man in America.

Of course there will never be a trial for the indicted Russians, but the fact that the Special Investigative team of Mueller and company, investigating Donald Trump, found Russian offenses against America, was all the FBI and the Attorney General wanted the public to hear: It’s all Trump’s fault.

But we still welcome liberals to the reality of the 20th and 21st centuries and the real nature of Russia.  You can still defend this evil nation and its total ruler, Vladimir Putin, but at least you have been shown the truth.

Vladimir Putin Takes American Democrats To School

American Democrats and their community organizing subsidiaries have been using Stalinist, Alinsky tactics for years to divide American citizens and disrupt our political election process, but after 70 years of the Soviet Union also undermining and subverting our Democracy, Vladimir Putin has now demonstrated that no matter how hard liberal Democrats use Soviet/Russian tactics in and against America,  the Rooskies are able to make our liberal Democrats look like the fools they are when the Russians use their tested and proven subversion tactics against the Democrat Party.

MSNBC and CNN actually did the bidding of Russia when they advertised and helped assemble crowds for Russian-planned, anti-Trump and anti-Clinton demonstrations, some of which even resulted in buildings being burned and people being beaten, so a thinking person has to conclude that Democrat, leftist Fake News organizations were actively colluding with Russia, and we all know how liberals pretend to hate people who collude with Russia, right?

One hates to speak in contradiction of the leftist hero, Comrade Barack Obama, but after witnessing events lately that conclusively prove how involved Russia has been in our national elections, I hope Obama’s followers now realize that the former president was completely wrong, and knowingly lying, when he told Mitt Romney that the threat of Russia was yesterday’s news and that Russia offered no threat to America at all in the 21st Century. And I hate to point out the actual and very real Russian collusion of Obama when he told the Russian Prime Minister, on an embarrassingly open mic, that he hoped Putin would give him time to get re-elected before he passed judgment on him. One wonders what Obama was afraid of with his admitted fear of Putin. Maybe the Russian president would have withheld a payment to Obama’s secret Swiss bank account for his favorable treatment toward Russia during his pro-Russian presidency.

At any rate, conservatives welcome Democrats to the 21st Century with the acknowledgement that Russia is a great threat to America and our ability to hold free elections which determine our political leaders, and not have to live as Russian’s are forced to do, with government-appointed Communist political and economic rulers.

Thursday, February 22, 2018

When Supposed Adult, Responsible Teachers, Manipulate Children

When emotion overcomes logic, reason and experience, as is currently happening with some surviving students of last week’s Florida school shooting, teachers and parents should do all they can to soothe and calm them and appeal to reason and logic in handling their misery. Instead we’re seeing just another liberal form of child abuse, this time coming from the Democrat party. These already stressed-out young people who survived the shooting are  being encouraged in their rage and their youthful emotional outbursts, via financial support from liberal Democrat donors, to march on the Florida legislature and demand an end to gun ownership in America. This type of mass, hysterical assembly was last seen when American liberals, at that time assembled by CNN and MSNBC broadcasts encouraging all good Democrat protesters to attend anti-Trump demonstrations and show their hate for him, were knowingly or unknowingly following the orders of Russians trying to undermine our  system of governing ourselves.  Liberal politicians were all over Donald Trump for the lie of Russian collusion, until it was learned that Russia placed the idea of protest marches where it would be fallen for by the most immature people: the liberal network press.

In western society it’s the adult role to explain to young people that emotion is not a path they want to follow or argue, and adults are supposed to help them understand the illogic of some of their positions’ emotional origins. Unfortunately, following the Florida shooting last week, the Democrat party moved immediately, efficiently and successfully (keep in mind the Russian bots that liberals allowed to trick them during and after the 2016 presidential election?) to organize survivors of the horrendous shooting, and paid for their transportation, food and lodging while they lectured the Tallahassee legislators with their leftist, gun control demands. One would be safe to doubt that the organizing Democrat functionaries would allow any young person to board the bus to the state capitol who wasn’t already persuaded to the left on the subject of gun control and an end to the second amendment protection of gun ownership.

Vladimir Putin would be proud of the Democrat attempts to get rid of self-defense weapons in America, because that’s exactly what happened in Russia as soon as the Communists took over that nation and began killing their opponents. Old Vlad, had he been in Florida last week, couldn’t have done a better job himself at organizing anti-American forces, and in fact one would not be surprised if he were not in collusion with a few leading Democrats and didn’t have a hand in this subversive scheme.

Although it’s completely understandable that the surviving Florida students would express emotions and insist on a stop to the killings, teachers and politicians alike should have explained the impossibility of halting such events in a free nation that has constitutional protection for gun ownership. However the teachers’ union is a slave to the Democrat party, so only political solutions favored by Democrats, aided by Russian bots, is what was allowed on the busses, and only leftist, emotional pleas were made to the Florida legislature.

One might well consider this treatment of students to be child abuse, and the Florida students were let down by teachers in their hour of need and distress.

Liberal Emphasis On “Protection” Wouldn’t Save One Student’s Life

Liberal movies and television programs push the idea of “protection”, but not the kind of protection that could save even one life during a school shooting, nor protect a student body from mass deaths if a shooting started.

Very likely there were some students at the Florida high school that was attacked last week who had “protection” on them, but the kind of protection that they needed for active self-defense, like a pistol or a rifle in the possession of an actual protector, was completely missing, and contributed to the loss of 17 lives in Florida last week.

If students have the responsibility to protect themselves against STDs (and this form of “protection” is pushed by Hollywood liberals ad nauseam in ads and films), why can’t they, their parents, other adults or teachers, carry self-defense protection to prevent mass killings by insane people?

If liberals in the law-enforcement profession will not implement and enforce laws against crimes employing guns, and if they plea-bargain for lesser charges and in the process drop the gun charges, how are we going to keep gun-carrying nut cases from committing repeat crimes, and how can society intimidate border-line crazy people and prevent future gun crimes?

The lying, leftist press, in their usual attempt to defame President Trump and to politicize the gun issue, is claiming that there have been 18 school shootings in 2018! So in 50 days, we’ve had 18 school shootings? This is a total lie, and the proof of its untruth is that we have not been inundated by the same breathless, political reporting, 24/7, that we’ve seen since the Florida shootings last week. The lying press is reporting the 18 former events that they claim may have happened near or on school grounds. But if there have been this many actual school shootings in 2018, why are we only now hearing about them? Because this is just more Fake News from the liberal press.

Liberals are the cause of nearly any problem facing America, and the more serious the problem the more involvement liberals have in the issue‘s cause, and passing another law restricting gun ownership would just be another law that liberal prosecutors would plea bargain away in order to get an easy conviction on a lesser charge, and the law will therefore go unenforced, which is exactly the situation with laws already on the books. So why pass more laws that will only be a waste of paper and will not solve anything? And we also need law enforcement professionals like sheriff’s offices and the FBI to respond to reports of suspicious statements and actions as citizens recognize possible threats they discover in their daily lives.

But the situation is made worse by snot-nosed young people who only quote the Democrat party line drivel and who are probably supporters of Bernie Sanders to boot, telling us what legislation will stop the killings, when one of Bernie’s own followers shot a group of Republicans a few months ago, nearly killing one of them, as they assembled to play baseball in a Washington DC suburb. Liberals claim to have a “sensible’ solution to gun shootings, but I’ve found that people who lack “common sense” are unable to  offer “sensible” solutions to anything.

Schools, and the young people who attend them, need real “protection”, not the symbolic kind that Hollywood likes to discuss because of its prurient attractiveness, and liberals have no idea how to provide such protection.

Wednesday, February 21, 2018

Are Our Assumptions About Federalism Mistaken?

It’s long been a staple of our federalist system of government that allowing the various states, and not the federal government, to decide policies and solutions to societal problems would allow the nation to test a range of fixes and see which one is the best solution to any given problem. Then, the assumption goes, all states would adopt the most efficient and best-working solution from all of the state examples, and the problem would be solved for all American citizens.

But were we wrong in these assumptions? For example: Does the mayor of Chicago admit that the liberal idea of strict gun ownership laws has failed as his city has become a kill zone, setting murder records each year? Does the governor of California, and the mayors of various cites in that state, recognize and admit that the killing of Kate Steinle was because of their idiotic sanctuary ideas that increasing numbers of Democrat politicians have been practicing? Do the California politicians not see the destruction to their state as citizens flee to other states that have fewer homeless people and lower taxes, where they can walk the streets of their neighborhoods and not fear being shot by an illegal alien or a drug-crazed addict?

Did Barack Obama learn from the socialized healthcare failure practiced in Massachusetts, which had escalating costs and poor service as its recommendation, before he mandated the same unworkable and unaffordable system on the entire nation? And have Democrats recognized the tragedy that Obamacare has been for those Americans forced to use it and do they express any regret for the ACA bill’s passage? And even with the expanding economy that has resulted from President Trump’s tax reduction plan, there are no Democrats I know of who will express surprise and pleasure at the success of this legislation and want to retain it forever, and even give more money back to the citizens who earned it so the economy can expand even further.

One can add to the list of non-workable, trendy, cool-sounding, leftist ideas, the proposal that we offer “sanctuary” to marijuana usage, in addition to the locales where pot smoking has already been locally approved. Oh, yes, the best way to serve the citizens of a city or a state is to give them another source of mind-bending, reality-distorting escape that leaves too many people unable to fully function in society and who eventually fall through the cracks and become fully dependent on Democrat politicians to provide them the bare subsistence they need in order to keep them voting the Democrat Party line.

And now we are told that each state must try its own plan to keep schools safe from mass shootings, with the winning idea to be implemented nationally as we see which idea is best at saving lives. The problem is that Liberal Democrats will never agree on a solution for anything that doesn’t give liberal politicians more control over citizens’ lives and that doesn’t take gun ownership rights from American citizens. The reason Democrats propose any policy is to maximize their power and their ability to make citizens subservient to them and their practice of handing out goodies in exchange for votes.

That’s the way it is, and that’s what Democrats do, and the only way to stop this leftward drift and the eventual denial of our constitution by leftist politicians, is to elect no more Democrats to any office in the nation. Democrat solutions to any problem are inevitably political and only serve the nefarious ends of big, intrusive government. Democrat solutions never solve problems, but only make them worse.

Tuesday, February 20, 2018

Can People Who Lack “Common Sense” Propose “Sensible” Solutions?

Allow me to list several things currently being proposed by liberal Democrats:

1. Open our borders to all Syrians, Mexicans, Norwegians and Central Americans with no restrictions.
2. Establish sanctuary cities and states where illegal alien criminals can seek refuge from Federal Law.
3. Allow a thick-necked, bearded, over-weight man to self-identify as a female, Japanese, ballet dancer. And then pretend this man is not out of his mind.
4. Pass a mandatory Affordable Care Act whose monthly premiums bankrupt middle class Americans, and whose deductibles are too costly to even use.
5. Allow men into women’s and girl’s restrooms.
6. Let one political party pay for a false document alleging criminal acts on the part of their political opponents, and then have the FBI knowingly pass this document to a FISA court for approval to investigate and surveil the other political party in order to entrap them.

Do these ideas make “sense” to you? Are these things in keeping with free elections and a rule by law under a constitution? The answer, of course, is NO. These are unreasonable, nonsense things only done in dictatorships or banana republics, but these things have been done by America’s Democrat party. And I’d say that any people or party with a track record like this is incapable of “sensible” solutions to any problem, especially a problem as difficult as the prevention of mass school shootings.

Monday, February 19, 2018

Liberals In The FBI Persecute Trump At The Expense Of Students Living Their Last Days

Having spent the last year seething daily and being outraged as the liberal swamp gratuitously persecuted the man who met and defeated their crooked Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election, which winning candidate then proceeded to ruin the Obama/Clinton legacy intended to Fundamentally Transform America; and having been doubly outraged at the corrupt work of the FBI as they happily passed known, Democrat-paid-for phony documents to the FISA court with the intention of electing Hillary and sending Trump frog-marching to prison; and then to be made triply angry to learn that the FBI, who plotted against Trump, didn’t take the time to follow up on and investigate serious leads given to them which could have foiled the school shooting that just happened in Florida, I am completely fed up with liberals and their dangerous and untruthful habits.

The frustration of watching filthy people, who I thought were patriotic Americans, proceed with this Russian collusion lie, spend valuable time and millions of tax-payer dollars and way too much partisan investigative effort, trying to undermine a legally conducted and won American election that put Donald Trump in the Oval Office, and to then find that these same political animals failed to protect the American students recently killed in Florida, is too much to describe.

All of the liberal/political plotting by Democrats and their political allies in the liberal news media, combined with the Strzok/Page plot to protect Hillary and put Trump in a bad light so as to preserve and continue the radical left administration of Barack Obama via the corrupt Clinton machine, has me so angry it’s indescribable.

One wonders how this nation became so successful and prosperous given the official government corruption we’ve seen used against Donald Trump since his miraculous election to the Oval Office in 2016. But, even though  I know that the corrupt officials are completely different from those good people who formed and preserved this great nation, and I know that all of our problems are the fault of, and are a natural product of, leftist political desires and their need to have absolute power and control over the American population, which population can only trust that their office holders are obeying the constitution and keeping the nation safe, I fear that there are not enough knowledgeable, patriotic citizens left in America to turn this drifting ship of state around, and right its course. Now those childhood dreams of dedicated public servants, obeying the constitution and the law, have been smashed, and we must now place our trust in President Trump to, indeed, Make America Great, and Constitutional, Again, or our nation is lost.

What I need to see, after a year of lying and collusion by the liberal elite in newsrooms and legislative bodies across America, as they attempt to overthrow the duly won election of Donald Trump, is to have the corrupt fools who are responsible for the investigative crimes and the school deaths, punished to the full extent of the law, and put in jail.

Saturday, February 17, 2018

Liberal Policy And The Use Of The Word “Sensible”

In the wake of the recent Florida school shootings, Democrats are pleading for “sensible” (note the lack of the stand-alone, more stark phrase “gun control”, plus also be aware of the silent admission that past liberal ideas have not been in any way “sensible” nor have past liberal ideas fixed the problem of mass killings in America) which, of course is an insistence on more severe restrictions on gun ownership, but with a softer, more pleasing tone.

As a test of whether liberal gun control efforts in the past have worked, for example, the liberal bans on “assault weapons” and the prohibition of bump stocks, the current status of such controls in eliminating school attacks in Florida don’t seem to be working, do they?

When one weighs liberal policies against successful outcomes, we learn that the words “sensible” and “successful” are the wrong words to use when evaluating Democrat policies.  After several rounds of “sensible” immigration control we finally ended up with Barack Obama totally opening up our borders to all illegal immigrants, and he even took the state of Arizona to the Supreme Court to prevent them from offering any restrictions to illegal entry into America. And then consider liberal mayors and governors establishing sanctuary for illegals, too often criminal illegals, and one has to doubt the reality of any liberal thinking being “sensible”, or even legal.  And considering liberal “sensible” welfare offerings: welfare was initially intended to be a safety net for people to use until they could get back on their feet and get a job, but our current welfare status finds too many people making a career out of government handouts; the “net” has become a trap.

But specifically related to gun controls implemented by liberals in cities like Chicago, Baltimore and, New York with their very restrictive gun possession laws, these are the same cities where one will find  the highest rates of murder in the nation, setting records each year. A wise person will reject any ideas for fixing gun crimes that come from liberals.

It becomes obvious that liberal policies and attitudes only make bad situations worse, never better. But they refuse to listen to possible causes for shootings and only want to clamp down harder on the past legislation that has failed miserably. Heaven forbid that we should take violent video games away from the liberal snowflakes who support liberals causes, and don’t think of investigating more fully as to how prescription drugs impact the mental health of boys (who are the ones growing up and shooting people) because controlling the nature and impulses of boys is a cause celebre for liberals. And also be reminded that it was liberals who insisted on releasing mentally disabled or just plain crazy people from dormitory lock-ups in the 1980s, throwing them on the streets to survive as they could, and that particular liberal idea is a large cause of the homeless masses we see lounging about in squalor and human waste in American cities today. But liberals will never admit that turning mentally sick people loose on the streets was a bad idea; liberal ideas are never bad and must never be reversed, in their opinion.

With so many guns in the United States there is no way to accurately assure that weapons are being kept from demented people, but if law enforcement personnel would respond more quickly to investigate mentally imbalanced statements and proclamations made by unbalanced people, and the Florida killer demonstrated exactly such mental imbalance, this legal attention could possibly halt many future such killings.

Gun Laws Will Stop Shootings, Like Obamacare Improved Healthcare

If you want more school shootings, then let the Obamacare team of leftist fools get involved and pass new laws restricting blanket gun ownership for all citizens. After all, have the various laws on the books written to prohibit theft actually stopped thievery; or have laws punishing murder stopped murders? No! Laws don’t stop crimes, but good policing and investigating leads do.

Unfortunately, due to whatever cause, young men are picking up guns, and too often and too frequently, are using them to kill people. It would appear that many of the killers lean toward the American political left in that they tend to get enraged and feel justified by the extremist words of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer or Bernie Sanders, and feel that they are on the right side of history and can righteously beat and kill some folks they don‘t agree with. But since not all liberals behave that way, we must agree that we therefore have to weed out the ones who are crazy enough to pull a trigger on humans and be sure that they are not allowed to arm themselves.

It’s certainly not a surplus of weapons on-campus that is the problem, because there are no longer any rifles or pistols to be found in high schools and likely not in colleges either. In the 1960s, high schools had many weapons used in Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) classes in almost every school in any town. There was rifle fire going all afternoon and into the evening in these high schools as ROTC students fired rifles during target practice on the school firing range. So I would argue that the leftist tendency to make rifles be treated like evil things has created an atmosphere in which rifles have been gotten rid of, and this situation is counter-productive. So for students in my high school, there was gun usage and appropriate training on-campus and in-school all the time, with no misuse of weapons having been reported at all; but that was before liberals got their hands on the subject of guns.

Similarly, young people growing up on farms or ranches were familiar with rifles and pistols, knew how to use them safely, and for these young people the mystique of guns was limited to the practical world of the farm. It seems that only city boys with little exposure to weapons and little or no knowledge of the proper usage of them, were attracted to the killing power of these weapons. When city kids watch the Hollywood depictions of gruesome murders and mass killings in video games, which are just another Hollywood product that destroys young minds, they apparently are attracted to the violence that Hollywood makes to look so masculine and strong. But with all of the political donation money Hollywood gives to leftist politicians in Washington, there is no chance in hell Democrats will ever cut down on the Hollywood money machine and ban their violent products.

So the latest liberal iteration of the phrase “sensible” gun safety rules will help stop the senseless shootings, like Obama’s Affordable Care Act made healthcare “affordable” and like Obamacare make healthcare in America better. We must devise ways to determine which young men are drifting toward violence, and then keep guns out of their hands, or detain them where they can‘t hurt other people.

Friday, February 16, 2018

More School Shootings, More Political Posturing

Once more we have witnessed the murders of school children, and once more we have seen the politicization of this horrific event. I can’t say which national political party politicizes events like the one in Florida, but it contains people of a leftist bent, much like the party of Bernie Sanders, whose dedicated follower shot Republicans assembled to play a baseball game, and nearly killed Steve Scalese, the Republican Majority Whip. But who in their right mind could call that a politically motivated attack? Hey, here’s an idea: maybe we should ban all liberals from having guns; it’s worth a try given that most killings occur in liberal cities and are committed by people of liberal persuasion.

When seeking a solution and an end to this sort of violent event, we know that outlawing guns will not accomplish the desired end to such disasters, so we need to get politicians out of the decision-making loop and let law enforcement representatives tell our legislators what to do to protect Americans. And we should also consider keeping the Washington swamp, establishment dwellers out of any solution and allow each state to try something different, if they so desire.

In the case of the recent Florida shooting, the FBI reported that they got word of a person with the same name as the suspected shooter posting a statement on social media to the effect that he intended to be a “school shooter”, but the FBI was unable to identify the person who posted the message and their investigation ended there. There is no way that anyone posting to social media cannot be identified quickly, so it seems that police departments and the FBI need better contacts and a little more power to push in order to get YouTube, Google, Twitter, etc. to cooperate with them to identify a person of suspicion. Anyone who gets the FBI or a Sheriff Department’s attention because of indiscrete actions or postings is likely someone that should be questioned and possibly whose background should be further investigated and be watched with greater scrutiny following an investigation.

Anyone who kills at random is mentally off balance and should be denied ownership of a weapon, regardless of how long he’s owned it, and police departments should be where this type of decision is made, in order to keep bad/sick guys from owning guns.

Police response time to such attacks, and even armed teachers on-site at schools, are important considerations to limiting the damage done during a shooting, but by the time such help arrives many lives may have already been lost. The only way to prevent such killings from happening in the first place is to be sure that insane people aren’t allowed to possess guns, and people making inappropriate statements should be carefully watched after questioning.

It’s impossible to ban all guns and still pretend to be an open nation with a constitution, but we can intelligently reduce the mentally at-risk members of our society and be sure they don’t have access to guns.

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

When Elected Politicians Propose Illegal Policies, It’s Decline And Fall Time

From California to Chicago to New Jersey and beyond we see Democrat mayors and governors specifically proposing activities for their cities and states that are forbidden under Federal Law. And given that most of the furor about sanctuary cities concerns United States immigration laws, which is wholly reserved to the Federal Government and not the states (and in fact the Obama administration helped out in this regard by having the Supreme Court declare that the Federal Government, and only the Federal Government, could make laws or try to enforce laws pertaining to immigration after the state of Arizona tried to enforce immigration laws more harsh than federal laws, while the Obama administration refused to enforce any laws at all that would restrict the in-flow of illegals across our southern border) these liberal, radical, leftist politicians are actively encouraging, and if one knows liberal Democrats at all, they will soon be requiring, illegal acts forbidden by duly passed legislation at the federal level.

Sanctuary states and cities also insist on allowing marijuana to be sold and used in their states, which is also in contradiction to federal law. The fact that Democrat politicians in these liberal locales wish to gain the votes of the “cool” youth that want to use these illegal substances, just shows how far removed from reality these liberals politicians are. Adult politicians should be serving the welfare of the entire population, not just the young and emotional members of the community, and should not be offering legal drugs that cloud young minds, all of which is not serving them very well. Who, except liberals, would suggest that our young people need another, legal drug that would help them put up with the stress and reality that’s so difficult for these precious snowflakes to put up with in their everyday life? “Real Life” occurs all the time and one never knows when it will hit them unexpectedly, but at that time of need, they will need personal discipline to get them through the crisis, and not a marijuana helper. Unfortunately “cool” politicians will probably get enough votes from dumbed-down young voters to stay in office in these locations and encourage the illegal things that were put in place to make society function more smoothly.

Berkeley, California is the latest city to jump on this “sanctuary” bandwagon by proposing they become a sanctuary city for marijuana. It’s apparent that the illegal immigration “sanctuary” thing is warping the minds of Californians for them to extend the meaning of the word this far and this inappropriately. Why not propose the city to be a sanctuary for people seeking relief from high taxes, or for people who desire to be left alone by big, intrusive government, or for people who want good jobs so they can better support their families? But to seek the lowest common denominator by proposing sanctuary for marijuana rather than sanctuary from marijuana, shows a total lack of a grasp on reality and what really matters in life.

The sanctuary idea is additionally a bad one because it will sap money and energy from our nation as more and more cities are burdened with unemployed, zoned-out people who too frequently commit serial crimes and depend on welfare from the ever-smaller number of citizens who work and pay taxes. And the idea of seeking uncontrolled access to legal drugs is proof that our young people are out of touch with a world that is largely poor, thirsty and hungry, and unless America can rally our entire population to our national rescue with hard work and creative minds, our nation, too, may sink into the mire of poverty-stricken nations, and at that point, we’ll be doomed.

We’re playing with fire with these extreme, leftist schemes, and our citizens had better wake up quickly, or our cushy lives will end quickly.

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

Hooray For Sarah Huckabee Sanders

President Trump’s Press Secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, has done a great job of daily combating the lying, Fake Press from her lectern in the press room of the White House.

A typical example of her critically important work occurred on February 12, 2018. She received a set-up, gotcha question from a reporter in the audience asking if the White House took national security seriously, in that Rob Porter, the White House staffer recently released from duty due to his personal, domestic legal problems, had not yet been fully vetted to handle national security documents. Ms Sanders responded that the White House takes national security issues very seriously and that the FBI was responsible for giving permission to Mr. Porter to handle classified information while awaiting full clearance, not the White House nor the president. Then she went on to tell the questioning reporter that if she were, herself, really interested in national security secrets being compromised and released, she should speak with the other reporters in the press room, because these are the people who release and print leaked classified information for the entire world to read, with neither proper clearance nor permission to do so

I’d like to be the first, that I know of, to nominate Sarah Sanders to run for president in 2024. Not only is she a true conservative who fights the lying, Fake News press every day without tiring, and would be the first woman president, which liberals pretend is important to them, but she was born in Hope, Arkansas, just like good ole Bubba, so she would be Our Republican Woman from Hope.

Monday, February 12, 2018

The Liberal American Press Even Lies When They Report The Actual News

When Bill Clinton, while the President of the United States, was accused of abusing women and was subsequently not only proven to be an abuser, but lied under oath to a federal court and was convicted for that lie, the liberal press dutifully reported the news and then insisted that the nation get back to the business of the people, and very quickly forgot about the intentional crimes of Clinton and about the hurt he caused various women.

But when an employee of Donald Trump, not the president himself, but a White House staffer (Rob Porter) is accused, not judged to be guilty, but so far only accused, of abusing his former wife, the liberal press has orgasms for days on end accusing Trump of who-the-hell knows what, but accusing him just from pure hate for him, and they’ll keep the subject alive as long as they can.

One can recall the Clinton days when the likes of James Carville and Paul Begala argued daily that what the president did in his personal life (this goes back to the Monica Lewinski event again) has nothing to do with how he conducts himself in office, and they urged that America let Clinton get back to serving them and forget his woman troubles.

But when a staffer of Donald Trump is accused of a personal, domestic action, which has nothing to do with Donald Trump nor the staffer’s work in the White House, the press will not let the subject rest, and attacks Trump personally, savagely and persistently.

When the Clinton aid Vince Foster, not only did he work for the Clinton White House, but he was a personal friend of the Clintons, was found dead in a Washington park not long after Bill Clinton became president, the press did not ride him about security checks into why Foster might have gotten into trouble to the extent that he was murdered, and what do the Clintons know but Foster’s death, and why didn’t the White House security staff know of this threatening situation and get some help to protect the president, or just get rid of Foster for having dangerous associates?

But when a Trump staffer that has no personal ties to the president is accused, simply accused, of hitting his wife, the press gives this non-news a full-court press slamming the president. If it turns out that the photo of Porter’s former wife was photo-shopped and is therefore false and her accusations are a set-up deal to injure the Trump administration, the press will give it a “never mind” and redirect their Trump hatred elsewhere. It’s what the hit-and-run press does.

There can be no doubt that anyone even slightly associated with President Trump is fair game for attacks by leftists, especially the press, and that goes double for Trump if anyone he knows personally gets into trouble; and you can bet that Trump will be blamed for it. This predilection of duty by the press to attack any conservative hard and often is not what the First Amendment to the constitution was all about. The constitution intended no press protection for NOT reporting news they don’t like nor for reporting only the news they think will benefit them politically. It was intended to protect the press when reporting news that impacts American citizens being abused by their own government, not to attack a president for frivolous reasons, which is what our liberal press does.

Members of the press celebrate and applaud giving sanctuary to people who are in this country illegally and who have committed serious crimes against American citizens, but they give no quarter to a president they detest, and who is undoing their hero Obama’s alleged legacy. Our anti-Trump and anti-Conservative liberal press acts only to undermine our nation and does nothing to protect and serve the welfare and benefit of American citizens.

Sunday, February 11, 2018

Who’s To Blame For America’s Darkest Hour?

Anyone who’s seen and heard the arrogant talk and self-righteous demands of immigrants who say they are owed civil rights and social benefits while living here illegally, will be justifiably angry at their threats against our nation. America has bent over backwards to make lives better for the down-trodden from all over the world, but I would caution that even though these unfortunate, complaining, demanding, illegal people are wrong, they should not be the concentration of American citizens’ scorn, blame and anger.

Rather, it’s American citizens, involved with and subservient to the Democrat Party, who are to blame for these threats to our nation, our sovereignty and our unity. Democrat President Barack Obama illegally and unconstitutionally allowed masses of illegal aliens into our country and allowed them to be rewarded with gifts and benefits, and it was the Democrat Party, desperate for dependants to slavishly vote for their candidates in each election, that has allowed this travesty to continue to the point where our great nation is nearly at the point of civil war.

These fool Democrats must be opposed at every turn and every opportunity, and they must be defeated and kept from office for their great threat and its resulting damage to our Representative Democracy.

Democrats: Americans Being Murdered By Immigrants Is No Big Deal. Americans Kill Americans Don’t They?

Democrats argue that the deaths of Americans at the hands of illegal immigrants is not evidence that we should do anything about the illegal immigrant problem; after all, they will say, Americans occasionally kill other Americans. But what Democrats don’t understand, or for political reasons will not admit, is that the killings that immigrants do is in addition to the domestic murders committed too frequently, and doesn’t address the issue of repeat crimes being committed each year by immigrants, in large part because of the sanctuary being given to immigrants by leftist cities and states. We have prisons full of American citizens who have committed crimes, so why are we permitting illegals to be here and add to the crime problem already made too high by American citizens?

 Using the illogical thought processes of liberals, one can expect them to soon take the position that our domestic prison population would be within their rights to claim that their civil rights are being denied by allowing illegal aliens to roam free while American citizens are locked up for their crimes. And next, liberals are possibly on the verge of proposing that our prisons be opened up and the prisoners set free so they can compete with illegals for access to Americans to attack. After all, Obama opened our southern border for criminal access, didn’t he?

A perfect example of liberals who refuse to discuss this subject logically and seriously is Juan Williams, who is frequently on Fox’s The Five. When he was asked a week or so ago about the recent killing or a young football star by a repeated illegal offender and about the Kate Steinle murder by another repeat criminal who was here illegally, he made the idiotic argument that Americans are daily killed by other Americans, so it’s obvious that liberals process such news with a dumb-blind over their eyes and we can assume that getting more poor, immigrant people into our nation so they can vote for Democrats is of a much higher level of political importance and priority than protecting Americans.

People like Juan Williams would quickly change their tunes if one of their children was killed by an illegal. But lucky for them, liberals like Mr. Williams live in upper-class neighborhoods where their children are unlikely to come in contact with the scum that liberals insist on exposing the rest of the nation to, by letting them roam free and protecting them from federal laws and punishment. This idiotic situation is tearing our nation apart.

Thursday, February 8, 2018

Obama Goes A “Period” Too Far

One will recall Barack Obama running from one end of the country to the other pushing his disastrous and unconstitutional Obamacare scheme on the nation and ending every lying statement about the plan with the word “period”, as in: You can keep your plan, period. You can keep your doctor, period. Each family will save $2500 a year on healthcare costs, period.

Each of his claims and promises were lies, and he knew they were lies as he practiced delivering each false sentence. All he wanted to do was get this socialist’s dream of a bill passed and he thought his legacy legislation would be in force forever and would become one of the most damaging and destructive legs of his promise to “fundamental transformation of America”.

Well, Fox News recently played a strangely haunting Obama video that looks like it will be as much a premonition as his other lies ending with the word “period”. The video showed Obama being interviewed by Chris Wallace, who had asked him about how closely he monitored FBI investigations, in this case the investigation, sorry, the
“matter“,  of Hillary and her illegal email system. Obama told Wallace that he “guaranteed” that Hillary would not be indicted, and he insisted that he never spoke with an FBI Director nor with the Attorney General about any case they were investigating, “I guarantee, full stop, period”. What our lying Obama left out of his statement is that he would, at his pleasure, make contact with FBI investigators and their managers when he wanted his ends to be achieved via the investigation.

So now we see messages from the Page/Strzok investigating team that “POTUS wants to know everything we‘re doing” about their investigation. And now we know that our Barry did have his nose in the Hillary investigation, and one would be a fool to think for a minute that he didn’t know of everything going on with the Trump set-up charges of colluding with Russia, because even if his desire “to know everything we‘re doing“ didn‘t pertain to the Hillary investigation, he was keeping up with an FBI investigation, which he swore he would never do, period. The Trump candidacy was a threat to Obama’s alleged legacy and the continuation of his leftist rule, in the form of the anticipated Hillary administration.

One can safely assume that Obama was a crooked president as well as a liar, and that he dictated the entire illegal plot in both the Hillary email “matter“ and the Trump persecution, PERIOD! Obama was tripped up and foiled in his attempts to rule the nation through the Hillary administration by the American citizens who rejected his big-government rule-of-personality and voted the Washington establishment darling Hillary, back to her mansion in New York.

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

Democrats Blaze A New Path: A Cover-up Where There Was No Crime

Contrary to the Watergate scandal where President Richard Nixon got himself into trouble and eventually resigned from office for his cover-up efforts following a non-important crime of breaking into a Democrat office in the Watergate complex, the apres-Obama Democrat party seems on the verge of destroying their party for covering up their illegal attempts to remove Donald Trump from office for a crime he never committed: the Russian collusion lie.

They are now in the process of trying to explain why the FISA court was given only an incomplete summary of their suspicions about Trump’s fictitious dealings with Russia prior to the 2016 election, and why they depended on a document that had been written and paid for by anti-Trump people like Hillary Clinton. They are now in the Nixonian position of having to cover up their own crimes, that were committed in order to convict Trump of his non-existent crimes.


Tuesday, February 6, 2018

A New Inquisition? Liberals Now Dictating How We Genderize God

According to an interview that Tucker Carlson had Monday night with a preacher at an Episcopal church in Washington, DC, religious liberals are now going to join the self-identity crowd and begin correcting we poor dumb fools on how to express ideas and belief in God.

The preacher Tucker was speaking with said that “gender limits us” in our thinking about God, so he wants for there to be a ban on saying “him” when referring to God. In my personal opinion, I believe that what increasingly “limits us” in this over-politicized and politically correct world is the total involvement of leftists in everything we do. Why is it more appropriate and liberating to think of God as a unicorn than as a man? Why would God being thought of as a woman be better? Why is gender such an touchy subject to liberals? After all, when bearded men are praised by liberals for thinking of themselves as gay, Thai women, what sense does any of this leftist insistence on political correctness make?

It’s not gender expression that liberated the western mind and allowed humans to prosper and seek wisdom, it was the end to religious control over vast populations and the end to the inquisition that liberated minds. And now we get these religious idiots living among the politically correct Washington swamp telling us to give up our hopelessly mundane habit of thinking about God as being a man?  I would suggests that it’s the liberals making these demands that need to free their minds and allow them to think bit more freely and not be dictated to by the latest Washington fashion.

This kind of political talk sounds much like Barack Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America” pledge as he began his first year in office. It turned out that his efforts in this “transformation” led to many edicts from Washington that clear thinking would identify as dumping our society down a dark hole. For example, Obama sought not to defeat ISIS but to merely “contain” them as this evil bunch of men killed and raped across vast regions, apparently at the pleasure of Obama; Obama illegally opened our southern border to all immigrants, leading to many crimes against American citizens and an increasing number of people being here who hate America and came here only for the goodies liberals would hand out; sanctuary cities, and now sanctuary states, allow liberal mayors and governors to defy federal laws and protect criminals that are preying on other immigrants; the FBI plotted with the Democrat candidate for president in 2016 to keep the Republican candidate, Donald Trump, out of office, and then began corrupt and prohibited procedures to get him impeached using totally false documents to do so and using these false documents to convince the FISA court to spy on Trump’s campaign. More recently Nancy Pelosi lied that lowering taxes would cause Armageddon and sink our economy, when any thinking person knows that exact opposite is what will happen when people are freed from government control over their lives. I’m sick of intrusive and lying politics being always in my face and in my way.

So why would anyone be surprised when preachers lecture us that we will be unlimited in our thinking when we think of God as being a green, Japanese chipmunk?

Monday, February 5, 2018

Following Nunes’ Memo Release, Democrats Can Only Finger-Point And Accuse

Even after the Nunes Memo, released last Friday, exposed the total illegality and criminal intent of Hillary Clinton and her FBI pals when they created the famous Golden Dossier, which was  illegally used to get permission from the FISA court to spy on the Trump campaign, and then was further utilized to justify hiring a special prosecutor to investigate Trump and everything he’s ever done for the slightest infraction or illegality, Democrats will admit no wrong-doing on their part and instead say that Republicans are just trying to cast doubt on the FBI as federal investigators persecute Trump, and they further argue that Republicans want to place the FBI investigation in a bad light in order to undermine Mueller’s Russia collusion investigation.

 Democrats take a leap of imagination by stating that believing that the top investigators of the FBI plotted to keep Donald Trump out of the White House, which we know they did, would make America open to a terrorist attack because Americans would no longer have faith in the FBI and would not report suspicious actions to them if they see bad characters, thereby inviting a terrorist attack, yada, yada. The truth is that Americans can at present doubt the impartiality of our FBI because of the way they conducted their passive investigation of the known Hillary email crimes, but are attacking Trump with both barrels blazing because of a bought-and-paid-for document hired by Hillary and the DNC.

What the Democrat’s heavily partisan position fails to admit is that if Hillary and the FBI had not bought the totally made up Dossier and then presented this false document to the FISA court, there would not have been a Nunes Memo that exposed the left’s political collusion to derail a political opponent’s campaign.

Hillary bought the Dossier, and the FBI, knowing the Dossier was false and politically motivated, presented it to the FISA court, which set of judges took the FBI’s word for its truth and accuracy, and then spied on Trump and his staff. This was a totally concocted, illegal happening, like you’d read about in a fiction novel about how the Hitler and Stalin governments, by persecuting and investigating their political opponents, maintained power before and after World War II.

Then, based on this ill-gotten, court-approved spying, Democrats made the fictitious charge of Trump being involved in collusion with Russia, and then the new Trump Justice Department hired Mueller to make his independent probe, which after fifteen months has found no evidence of any Trump collusion with Russia nor with any other nation.

The Democrats started all of this with a lie, as detailed in their Dossier, and now continue the lie, just like Richard Nixon did during the Watergate scandal in the 1970s, in order to cover up the Obama administration’s illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign team, while blaming Trump for all of the mess that has resulted, with Trump being the only innocent party to this entire, shabby story.

Sunday, February 4, 2018

Democrats Know No Shame, And Don’t Know The Difference

When Richard Nixon was lying about the Watergate break-in, Republicans were mortified by his actions and obfuscations and wanted him removed from office as much as Democrats did. And the Watergate scandal was just a limited, one-party-spying-on-the-other, relatively innocent event.

But now it’s been determined that during and following the Obama administration, departments of our own national government, represented by Barack Obama and branches of his administration (in this case the DOJ, the State Department and the FBI) all colluded to keep an opposing party’s candidate for president out of office by employing one of the most sensitive and protected powers of government, the FISA court and its ability to authorize the investigations of American citizens for foreign intelligence issues. These branches of the executive branch of government in a Democrat administration were active parties attempting to deny Trump the presidency. One thinks that one should be able to expect the guilty party in such a fiasco to admit their guilt once that guilt has been exposed as being the most chilling political scandal in American history.

But America’s Democrat party shows no shame nor acknowledgement of overstepping the bounds of propriety and the law at plotting to deny Trump his run for the presidency and to be seated once he had won the election, and they see no parallel between the staged elections held in Russia and other dictatorial governments around the world, and what they did in the last election. One can only guess that their success in rigging the primary election against Bernie Sanders made the Hillary team feel frisky and they thought that taking Trump to the cleaners would be as easy as beating an old Socialist like Sanders.

The fact that Democrats are still on the Trump-is-the-devil warpath even after these recent discoveries of mal- and misfeasance by the Obama administration, and that they are unable to express any regret or shame for their political crimes, should tell us a lot about their sincerity and their anger when they turn their guns on a Republican slip-up or a slight mis-statement. And this full-on attack with their anti-Trump vitriol, as opposed to expressing some self-inspection as these serious charges are brought against them, tells us that there is a fine line separating open, representative government from total dictatorship.  Democrats show no sign of understanding where this line starts and stops. If they had indeed made their lame charges against Trump stick, one fears there would not be a need for another election in 2020, because the rightful owners of power in America, at least in their own minds, would already hold that power. And if one is unable to feel shame for obvious corruption, then one will have no incentive to make changes to oneself and assure that such political crimes never occur again.

The very people who illegally and improperly beat up on Trump by using the full investigative power of the federal government are so hate-filled that they will allow no adjustment to their hateful goals of removing the Republican sitting president and are incapable of recognizing and admitting his many successes during his first year in office.

Lesson learned: Leftists must be feared and defeated and kept from positions of power in all levels of government in America. Whether they are setting up illegal sanctuary states,  illegal sanctuary cities, denying Americans their constitutional right to select and buy their own healthcare or are purchasing documents wholly created from fiction to use as evidence against their political opponents, as the famous Dossier was, they can no longer be trusted with the power to govern, as we saw proven last Friday with the release of the Nunes Memo.

Friday, February 2, 2018

Democrats Argue That “Who We Are” As A Nation, Is Something We Have Never Been

For those Americans who are too young or pay too little attention to our constitution and know too little about American history, the devious and lying statements of Democrats about “who we are” as a nation will ring true due to the  ignorance of too many of our population, and will be just another in a series of lies spread to push America leftward toward the precipice.

Barack Obama started this line of political BS when he stated that deporting illegal aliens is “not who we are”.  For Mr. Obama’s information, illegal aliens have always been deported, but not since our Obama illegally and unconstitutionally opened our borders for anyone to enter, and then created an emotional crisis with his DACA edict, and Democrats are now making illogical hay out of it. This is especially harmful to America and unfair to American citizens because emotion is a dangerous thing, especially when many of the emoters have bad designs for America and plot to get a few more million uneducated, anti-American aliens north of the border who are willing to carry the Mexican flag and demand more goodies from government at tax-payer expense. Democrats plan on these new citizens to immediately vote Democrat, and that would end America as we currently know it.

And of course Nancy Pelosi took up the political line recently when she called Donald Trump a racist after he offered more than the Democrats demanded in the DACA talks on this issue, which has accompanied the looming budget negotiations. Trump should retaliate by commenting on Pelosi’s Fake Views and stress that she is a common Democrat liar, chuckle at her expense, and move on with his critical work for America.

Expanding the Democrat “who we are” misrepresentation a little further, we never saw the DOJ or the FBI involved in scandals attempting to keep a duly elected president from taking office, until the Obama administration. That kind of practice was never allowed and was not “who we were” prior to the Obama administration.  We used to assume that the Democrat party respected the flag  and the nation enough to stand for the national anthem and to show respect for our military personnel and for the police officers that  risk their lives daily to protect our property and our lives, until the Democrats took the side of the Black Lives Matter group and started celebrating the killing of police officers. The Constitutionally protected national press used to report only the news and tell the truth in their stories until Donald Trump became President, and now we get daily False News stories written for the sole purpose of embarrassing and unseating the sitting president. The Democrat party used to serve the interests of the American citizens who elected them to office, until Democrats decided to form sanctuary cities to protect people, who are here illegally, from the laws the federal government attempts to enforce. Democrats used to believe in hard-working citizens who supported their families and paid their taxes, until they discovered that they could have more assured electoral success if they kept poor people poor and on welfare and handed out the occasional crumbs to keep them voting Democrat in the next election.

America is no longer “who we really were”, because Democrats rewrite history every time they open their mouths and try to convince the uninformed among us that America has always been a socialist, racist nation without laws and with open borders.

Democrats are solely responsible for the destruction of this once great nation and for limiting the future of America and of America’s citizens by lying about “who we are“ and reducing “who we might become” under future Democrat, unconstitutional rule.