Does Texas Deserve Hurricane Harvey’s Destruction?

On Tuesday, Kenneth Storey, a visiting professor at the University of Tampa, suggested that the water and wind destruction in the Houston area caused by Hurricane Harvey was deserved, because Trump was the dominant presidential candidate in Texas in 2016. One wonders when Minnesota and Michigan are expected to be hit by a plague for also putting Trump ahead of Hillary in the last election.

The person suggesting this stupid thing is obviously a liberal, probably one who does not believe in God, so why is he putting forth such  a deranged idea and crediting God with implementing his own bad wishes for Texans?

Does the fool man believe that if a just God were trying to punish the citizens of Texas because they for Trump, that He would allow the minorities and liberals who probably voted for Hillary to have to live through the same misery as the Trump supporters? Why would a just and good God, and our good professor evidently believes that God is just or he wouldn’t be attributing to God the responsibility to punish for the Trump vote in Texas, punish the state for voting for Trump and not individually punish only the offenders who voted for him? And why is God not punishing all of the other states that favored Trump in 2016? After all, Trump was elected president by the citizens of the entire United States. Maybe, and I believe the professor’s illogic tracks here, the clever professor may even go so far as to wish for North Korea to launch a nuclear attack on the U.S. for electing Trump. That’ll show those rascally Republicans! Liberals and their ill-will toward those who don’t agree with them are beginning to look like real threats to the citizens of the United States.

One wonders how many of the current residents of Texas, suffering under Harvey, were formerly residents of New Orleans and relocated to Houston to escape that disaster? Is the hurricane and bad karma literally chasing and following these unfortunate people from Louisiana to Texas? Is God pursuing these poor souls? Is it logical, based on the enormous lack of logic of the good professor, for us to assume that Katrina was the punishment to New Orleans for having elected a liberal mayor in the person of Ray Nagin (whose karma now finds this liberal politician in federal prison)? Did hurricane Sandy punish the residents of New Jersey for voting for Barack Obama?

And if the people who voted for Trump are so evil and undoubtedly racist and homophobic in the opinions of liberal Democrats, then why are we seeing so many white rescue workers rescuing black people from the flood waters in their boats and helicopters? Why would hateful, racist whites want to inconvenience themselves and place themselves in danger to help black people and transport them to rescue areas where they can be fed and housed temporarily in relative comfort and dignity? But the rescue workers are proudly doing these things in order to help those in greatest need, and they’re glad to be able to help.

Hurricanes are naturally-occurring events that develop because of unknown atmospheric and meteorological conditions. They have nothing to do with politics and nothing to do with warming/change, as liberals would have us believe. There have always been hurricanes all over the world, and one wonders if all liberals believe that these naturally-occurring events are always political and are divinely intended to punish someone for something?

The “karma” that Professor Storey thinks God brought down on Texas because of a presidential vote has backfired on him. The University fired him and the good professor is now at liberty to go to Texas and help rescue and relocate the suffering citizens of the Houston area. Liberalism has become a disease that is being spread by total stupidity and a lack of common sense, as expressed by today‘s lying press, and our leftist universities.

I Voted For Trump For President. Did I Make A Big Mistake?

The liberal press is intent on making Americans believe that they made a mistake last November by voting for Donald Trump for president. Every time any event related to Trump is reported they apply the most extreme negative slant to what Trump does and says, and it makes one wonder if Americans made a mistake when they cast their vote for Trump. Well, I’ll admit that I voted for Trump and I want to be certain that I did the right thing, even though the liberal press assures me that I did the absolute wrong thing. So let me review my vote and see if I did good, or bad:

I voted for the candidate whose election single-handedly made the stock market rise to unprecedented levels. That’s a good thing.
I voted for the candidate who, as president, has bravely stood up to North Korea and their nuclear threat. That’s good, too.
I voted for the candidate who removed America from the Paris Accords and refutes the lies told about climate change/warming. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who tried hard, in spite of foot-dragging from his Republican counterparts in the legislature, to repeal Obamacare. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who means it when he talks about building a wall and whose plain speaking has nearly halted illegal immigration across our southern border. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who has threatened to withhold funds from sanctuary cities if they continue to disobey federal immigration law. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who is calling the lying press “the lying press”. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who stands up to the lies the press tells and fires retorts back at them when they get in his face during pressers. That’s really good.
I voted for the candidate who has revised the rules of engagement for the military so our troops are no longer at a disadvantage on the field of battle.  That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who will, without flinching, call both the KKK and Black Lives Matter groups violent and despicable. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who is serious about tax relief in America. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who expresses horror at our historical statues and monuments being torn down by leftist freaks. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who tweets messages that keep us voters informed of his thinking, and which tweets also drive the liberal Democrats crazy. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who wants to end the social experimentation of allowing transgenders in the military. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who pardoned Sheriff Joe Arpaio for the shaft that he got from the Obama Department of Justice, because Arpiao opposed Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional actions regarding illegal immigration. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who seems to “get-it” with his logo of Making America Great Again. That’s good.
I voted for the candidate who just keeps plugging toward achieving his announced goals in spite of the lies, personal insults and roadblocks the press throws at him constantly. That’s good.

After due consideration and reflection, I think my vote for Trump was the right thing to do, and I’d gladly do it again.

It’s Okay For Liberal Democrats, But It’s Not Okay For Our Side

It’s Okay for Obama to allow transgenders to join the Military, but it’s not Okay for Trump to reverse the practice and insist on a ready fighting force not distracted by leftist social engineering experiments.

It’s Okay for Obama to take people’s healthcare away and increase the costs of their deductibles and premiums under Obamacare, but it’s not Okay for Trump to open healthcare to market competition and lower healthcare costs to all Americans beginning with his administration.

It’s Okay for Ted Kennedy to travel to Moscow in order to plot with the Russians to defeat the Reagan administration, and it’s Okay for Obama to sneakingly beg Putin for more time to get re-elected, but if the lying press suggests that Trump met with even one Russian citizen, or maybe he spoke with Putin at an international meeting for 20 minutes, Trump is judged by liberals to be unbalanced, a traitor and unfit to be president.

It’s Okay for Bill Clinton to have a series of affairs and to abuse numerous women, one such event even occurring in the Oval Office with an intern, with Hillary remaining silent about these abuses, but when Trump appeared on stage behind Hillary at a campaign event last fall, she labeled him a predator male and the press gives her maximum coverage and support.

It’s Okay for Obama to be all modern and high techy by using rapid response methods and emails and tweeting while campaigning, but let Trump  do these things and he’s said to be abusing his power and not being presidential.

It’s Okay for Obama to tell the assembled Republicans in 2008 that the way things will get done during his administration is for Republicans to not listen to Rush Limbaugh and not pay attention to his advice, but when the leftist press is called out by Trump for lying about him, he is accused of trying to deny constitutional rights to the press (even though the constitution does not give the press the right to NOT report news that is contrary to the presses’ political welfare).

It’s Okay for Obama to NOT enforce duly processed laws and let millions of illegal aliens into our country and reward them with welfare benefits, but it’s racist for Trump to enforce the law and punish sanctuary cities who disobey the law regarding immigration.

It’s Okay for Obama to sue the Little Sisters Of The Poor and force them to provide abortions to their employees under his Obamacare provisions, but when Trump calls the press out for lying, the press calls his words an abuse of the constitution and an attempt to shut them up.

It’s Okay for the left to suddenly, sometimes after hundreds of years of these monuments being in place, begin tearing down statues of confederate soldiers, but when someone reminds them that all of such statues commemorate old southern, racist Democrats like themselves, their accusers are called racists.

It’s Okay for the Obama family dog to be flown to Martha’s Vineyard on a government 757 to join the family for a few days; and it’s Okay for Michelle and a few dozen of her friends to use a government aircraft do a little shopping in Madrid, but if the Trump family travels to a city and stops in a hotel owned by Trump, thereby saving the government thousands of dollars in lodging costs, the press carries on for days on end about the excesses of Donald Trump.

It’s Okay for Obama to state with the grandness of a complete emperor and as part of his planned “fundamental transformation of America”, that his presidency would lower the rising ocean and heal the earth, but when Donald Trump stresses that he wants to Make America Great Again via lower taxes and fewer EPA regulations, he’s called an unhinged, insane kook.

It’s Okay for Obama to pardon a terrorist murderer and an ex-military traitor, among other unsavory pardons he issued, but when Trump pardons Sheriff Joe Arpaio because the Obama Justice Department prosecuted him for trying to enforce the immigration laws of the nation and his efforts to protect our constitution, the left calls for Trump’s impeachment for this horrendous, unprecedented act.

It’s Okay for Obama to have gotten his start in radical politics at the feet of the terrorist Bill Ayers and to have sat in Jeremiah Wright’s anti-American church for 20 years listening to this man‘s hateful rants, but if Donald Trump had one business dealing with a Russian at any point in the last 30 years, the press demands that he resign from the presidency for collusion with the enemy.

To Ban Gone With The Wind Is To Go Out Of Your Mind

Seventy-eight years have passed since the making of Gone With The Wind, and the people who preach understanding, acceptance and diversity now ban a MOVIE that was simply an expression of what actually happened to real people. The movie was tastefully done, unlike the trash that these same liberals produce, such as the movie depicting the assassination of President George Bush, and the bloody beheading of President Donald Trump, which were not re-enactments of history but were rather the left’s wish to overturn elections in which their radical candidates lost and their radical ideas were rejected by the American citizens.

The scenes from the banned movie that the left is so offended by were nothing compared to the absolute savagery and violence that the left actually commits each day with their demonstrations, beatings, fire bombings and their police assassinations. Leftist radicals are now acting out the imagined and pretend violence they expressed with the severed head of Donald Trump and the tearing down of statues of Confederate, Democrat soldiers.

The radical left, in their rage for power and their anger at losing that power when Hillary was defeated by Donald Trump in the last presidential election, have lost contact with reality, and the American people know it and will reward them for their insane actions at the next election.

The losing left has really overstepped the bounds when they ban a simple, historical movie, while encouraging real and present violence with their marches to protest Charlottesville and their ravings about the racism that only they demonstrate, while they claim that President Trump is the problem.  With the banning of this movie, can Nazi-like book burnings be far behind?

Anticipating CNN’s Sunday Morning Hurricane Harvey Report

Here is part of the lying text that I expect CNN to start their day with on Sunday, August 27th:



Yesterday, Saturday, August 26th, the specter of Global Warming/Climate Change slammed into southern Texas with a 500-year hurricane that will set records for years to come for its destructive power and as proof that the world is coming to an end right before our eyes, because Donald Trump took America out of the Paris Climate talks, and began backing out environmental regulations that the EPA had enacted during the Obama administration.

The racist and Russia-colluding Trump administration was totally unprepared for this event, and FEMA failed at every turn to provide for the saving of lives and the protection of property, as did the Texas Republican governor fail the citizens of Texas. In fact all Republicans are at fault for this act of nature, just because they are Republicans and racists.

We hear reports that President Trump is Tweeting status statements about the devastation in Houston and is informing us that he will travel to the flooded area this coming week to have a personal look. But if he cared about the suffering going on there he would get on Air Force One immediately and be there to assist with the recovery. But of course, if he flies to Houston today we will accuse him of grand-standing, getting in the way of recovery attempts and seeking attention, so we’ve pretty much got him right where we want him: damned if he does, and damned if he doesn’t.




It’s possible that CNN and other far-left agencies will just report the news and not indict the Trump administration for any destruction that the storm did, but I expect them to try real hard to make President Trump look like he didn’t care about Texas, and I also expect that Al Gore and his radical environmental buddies will take this opportunity to squawk about Paris and make claims along the line that this strong storm is indeed being caused by Trump’s rejection of severe and punitive environmental regulations.

Nancy Pelosi Forbids Yelling “Wolf” In A Crowded Theater

On August 24^th, Nancy Pelosi demonstrated her mental acuity by informing us that it’s unconstitutional to yell “wolf” in a crowded theater. One can easily doubt that the constitution goes into any specificity about yelling any particular words, inside or outside of crowded theaters, but our Nancy considers herself quite the subject-matter expert on the subject. I believe that she is confusing one of Aesop’s Fables with a judicial decision made in 1919.

The word “wolf” may have some serious meaning in the wilderness of Alaska, but I doubt that it carries any dark, panic-inducing meaning in a movie theater. She made the statement while objecting to an organization called Patriot Prayer and its intended, and already approved assembly, called “Freedom Rally”.

The Washington Times reported Mrs. Pelosi’s confused statement as a mixed metaphor, but I’d say it’s her mixed brain we see displayed. And to further the investigation into Pelosi’s reference to a wolf, as used in Aesop’s Fable, leftist politicians like Nancy Pelosi have cried “wolf” way too many times against the Trump administration. The American left has accused Trump of everything in the book in their attempts to convince the people who voted for him in 2016 to desert his administration, and we are still hanging in there with the man who promised to Make America Great Again. References to “crying wolf” by our lying, radical leftist politicians are sure to be met with “fire” and defeat in upcoming elections, because America is sick and tired of hearing from establishment politicians who only serve their own radical careers in the swamp of DC while the average American is suffering less income, a stalled job, if they have one at all, a failed education for their children and a nation that has forsaken its own marvelous constitution and a rule of law.

Nancy Pelosi and her liberal pals like to make fun of President Trump and call him demented, unpresidential and out of his mind, and then she sets her own reputation back a mile by making such a stupid statement, about a group and its planned assembly, which has already been approved by the National Park Service. I found a reference to the group Patriotic Prayer that called it a “far-right group” and said that they were related to the Charlottesville incident which resulted in the murder of a young woman. Unfortunately for Nancy and her radical pals, we all know that one of the main reasons for that tragic loss of life was that the Democrat Governor of Virginia and the Democrat Mayor of Charlottesville called off police protection and control of the competing groups assembled there, which allowed those two leftist groups (See NOTE below) to meet and practice the violence that Democrats have recently become known for. But since Nancy Pelosi opposes the group, one may logically be persuaded that it may be a decent group that really seeks prayer in a turbulent world, and lacking any further information, I have to believe that such a group would naturally be opposed by leftist anti-Americans like Mrs. Pelosi.

NOTE: the two leftist groups, white supremacist KKK/Nazis and black supremacist Black Lives Matter groups, are actually warring leftist groups, just as Hitler and Stalin headed leftist governments in World War II and eventually fought each other for dominance of Europe after a period of pretend unity, which ended when Hitler invaded Russia. Russia won the war with the help of the allies, and half of the threat to world peace and prosperity, The Soviet Union, went on to dominate Eastern Europe and place that portion of the world in a state of slavery, misery and fear for decades, until the Wall came down in the Reagan administration. America has much to fear from our two radical groups competing for violent power in the United States, but the truth is that Donald Trump denied support to both the Nazis and the BLM combatants, whereas the likes of Nancy Pelosi fully support and love the Black Lives Matter thugs. Since there is no real difference between the Nazis and the BLM people, one can see no difference between today’s violence-prone Democrat Party, headed by Nancy Pelosi, and the violence-prone Black Lives Matters group. In fact, Barack Obama loved BLM so much that he invited them to the White House and provided them with the moral support that comes with a presidential welcome. One needs no further example of kinship than these two violent groups meeting and lunching in the White House during a Democrat administration.

Liberals’ Actions Are Often Contrary To Their Words

Liberals like to shoot off their mouths about how bad, racist, intolerant and sexist America is, especially under the Presidency of Donald Trump, and America is always being accused of mistreating people, with particular attention given to mistreating illegal aliens whom Obama loved to let roam the nation with no controls and no boundaries.

But now Canada is learning that not all of the anti-American bluster was founded on fact. Now that we have a real patriot in the White House who is serious about obeying the law and protecting the American population, many of the illegals assembled here under Obama are high-tailing it north and are testing the ability and willingness of Canadians to accept this deluge. It almost reminds one of the differing immigration controls that exist between East and West European nations. Germany admits refugees without batting an eye and has experienced horrific terrorist attacks for their kindness, while Poland blocks the entrance of illegals and has had no terrorist attacks. In North America, the United States has been the immigrant-welcoming nation while Canada launched attacks against conservative Americans for wanting controls and checks on those entering our nation.

Now Canada is thinking a little more clearly about this subject. In the presence of the vast number of people who are running from America and heading north to Canada under Donald Trump, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was recently seen making rather defensive statements, such as his considered opinion that the “rule of law” must be followed; about how the government must “protect Canadian citizens”; and insisting that “full security checks” will be made of all who enter Canada from El Salvador, Nicaragua, Haiti and Honduras. It’s about time liberals came out of their shell and looked around them. Liberals think that every poor, uneducated person in the world deserves to live in a western, wealthy nation. But the government can’t tax citizens highly enough to provide free healthcare to everyone, just as it cannot provide a free college education to all of its citizens.

While traveling recently, I read an editorial opinion piece in the Des Moines Register which tearfully admitted that Obamacare is failing and will continue to do so, and then the editorial staff blamed Donald Trump for not “fixing” Obamacare so it can continue to fail into the next century and cost untold billions of dollars that the American tax payers must fork over in order to protect the good name and legacy of Barack Obama. Missing in the piece was any mention of the series of repeated lies that Obama told in order to get Obamacare passed, nor did it mention the intention that Obama’s legacy legislation was intended to fail so the government could take over and nationalize healthcare on the way to burying our constitution and moving America to the ultra left just as the Soviet Russian and Nazi Germany did. Obama, on numerous occasions, said that if someone had a better idea than the Affordable Care Act they should tell him what it is, but he would not even consider listening to a market-based solution, so the Affordable Care Act is what he shoved down our throats.

Liberals, whether the subject is immigration or healthcare, are unable to think beyond the government taking control of every situation and making things not only worse, but much worse, and much more expensive, than before they tampered with it. What the left lacks is common sense and a market evaluation of how things work, and we’ll keep having one disaster after another as long as liberals rule our government and continue this radical trend. Justin Trudeau, in his moves to protect Canadians from a dangerous flood of refugees, is about to commit the American crime of being sensible and placing controls on people entering his nation. He’d better be careful. In the present world, clear thinking and responsible decisions are always punished by radical leftists.

The Day-To-Day, Pointless Policy Trends Of Democrats

Stated briefly, the Democrat Party has no policies and no plans for the future except to continue the “fundamental transformation of America” that Barack Obama promised and began implementing during his presidency. The Chuck Schumers and the Nancy Pelosis of the world are clueless and have no original ideas in their blockheads.

While President Trump is trying to push the Republican congress to pass legislation of enduring value and importance to American citizens (examples: Trump wants increased national security, immigration reform, lower taxes, healthcare freedom) the Democrats hop-and-skip, minute by minute, between proven policy failures that have no long-range value or importance, but are only intended to be stumbling blocks  for President Trump (examples: Democrats loudly defend their unconstitutional sanctuary cities idea; they push for gender identity bathrooms; they insist on spreading the lie of Russian collusion; the lying press frets about the White House staff; they bad-mouth Trump for his excellent speech following the Charlottesville murder; they tear down confederate statues that previous Democrats had erected to celebrate the racism that the Democrat party stands for).

The only consistent policy the Democrats have is to unseat Trump and get their power back. They have no vision for the future, they don’t know what the American people want or need, and they continue to lose elections in the era of Trump. And the only enthusiasm Democrats exhibit involves assassinating Trump, cutting off Trump’s head, and stabbing him to death Julius Caesar style. Do these things demonstrate a readiness or ability to run a nation?

When Democrats rule, they stand for increasing the size of an already too-big government; they want to allow an invasion of illegal aliens in order to gather new Democrat voters to keep Democrat politicians in office; they have a tendency to disrupt business practices and economic growth with taxation and EPA regulations that kill job creation; and then when the jobless rate goes up they want to entrap the unemployed in a vicious cycle of  dependence on government and welfare programs in order to pay for their beer and cell phones, which is similar to the slavery that former Democrats practiced and celebrated with confederate statues and that current Democrats want to cover up by tearing down these same statues.

Liberals May Soon Run Out Of Symbols to Hate

It seems like an almost weekly mantra that liberal groups will announce a statue of a Civil War Confederate soldier that they want to tear down whether he was a slave owner or not. Any given statue may be commemorating a local soldier who was just fighting to protect his own family and home from the destruction of Union armies as they marched through the south during the Civil War, and the remembered soldier may have had no interest in slavery at all.

If liberals continue with their destructive efforts toward every statue they see, it won’t be long until these hated monuments to the confederacy will be a thing of the past and then there will be no more bronze memories to refresh their hate. Having symbols of past wrong-doings can be valuable as reminders of things to not do again. But the deranged American left is so full of hate and so desirous of regaining the power they had under Obama and lost when Hillary was defeated at the ballot box, that they can’t think logically and sensibly in the new world of Trump and his attempts to return the United States to constitutional operation and protection once again.

Liberals forget that there were black slave owners in America as well as white ones, so owning a slave in early America had nothing to do with racism, it had to do with economics and what was acceptable at the time. The reason the slaves were in America was that blacks in Africa had no problem with enslaving members of other tribes, and in the latter days of the era they were able to make money by selling the slaves outside of Africa and realize a greater profit.

One very important thing, though, has escaped the enraged left. With their hate of Trump they have forgotten that the south that they so hate was run by Democrats who had strong ties with the KKK. Old Democrat heroes like Al Gore’s father, and Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, who was a leader of the KKK and has many monuments and highways with his name on them, were until recently worshipped as strong supporters of Democrat causes and were recently praised by the likes of Hillary Clinton. So are Democrats prepared to erase Byrd’s name from these commemorations and his memory from the tales of the Democrat party they’re members of, or will they regain some sense and begin acting responsibly again?

It almost looks like modern day Democrat radicals are risking being called domestic terrorists with their threats to destroy statues,  including those of Lincoln and Washington, and their constant threats to our constitution and America’s proud tradition of rule of law. Considering the destruction liberals are doing to America, no terrorist could do more damage to our way of life and to our nation than Trump-hating Democrats are doing.

Liberalism Is The Source Of All Evil In The Modern World

When one reflects back on recent history, one realizes that the Communist Soviet Union and Nazi Germany were very liberal, dictatorial nations: both of those governments controlled the economies of their nations, both ruled with an iron fist and punished their citizens at the will of the rulers without the protection of a constitution that had any value, each had government control of education and each had a single payer healthcare system, like that of the Obama administration, all of which kept the populace under control.

Now immigration has become a dominant aspect of life in developed countries with ISIS forcing large numbers of people to flee their home nations in the Middle East in order to escape certain death at the hands of vicious murderers. The result of the threat of ISIS is that Europe has been overcome by invading hordes of people from nations like Syria. The Europeans have done little or nothing to keep these invaders out, and in recent years we have seen France, Belgium, Germany, Spain and England be on the receiving end of massive terrorist attacks as the invaders reward the nations handing out assistance and refuge with death and destruction for their good will. But in Eastern Europe, in Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia, there have been no ruinous terrorist attacks, because the Eastern European nations have not allowed the invading immigrants from the Middle East to find homes in their nations, thereby they’ve avoided the horrific attacks that we’ve seen in recent years in Western Europe and America.

But the European Union has decided that the peaceful lives of the Eastern Europeans should have its share of death and destruction, so they’ve decided that they will withhold certain funds from those nations in the East who do not allow invading immigrants to settle in their countries. This reminds one of the reverse situation in the United States where the Trump administration has decided that sanctuary cities, which were established during the ultra-liberal Obama years, should no longer be able to disobey federal law and give solace and protection to invading immigrants residing in those cities, and will withhold certain federal monies from sanctuary cities as punishment for breaking the law and endangering the citizens residing in them.

In summary,  the US, under the Trump administration, will withhold money from non-complying cities in an attempt to increase security, while in the EU money will be withheld in order to weaken the security of those Eastern nations. The EU’s policy will only ensure more invasion by radical forces, and more terrorist murders of innocent citizens.

The citizens of England spoke on this issue when they voted in favor of BREXIT so as to escape the terrorist threats that the EU is forcing on its subjects, and one wonders when other European nations will take such a vote so they can get the terrorist invaders out of their midst. The current liberal leaders of Europe have placed their citizens at great risk with the mass murders of numbers of people at periodic intervals, and they don’t have the courage or perhaps even the intellect to realize the threat they have brought to beautiful Europe.

The Trump administration, with it travel bans and its plans for greater security via the punishment of sanctuary cities and the building of a wall along our southern border, has the correct policies, and the EU is just making a dangerous terrorist situation worse by weakening security across the continent. But the EU leaders are too locked into their misguided liberal ideas of perfection to be able to make difficult decisions, and they are unwilling to change immigration policy in order to  save their own citizens’ lives.

Liberals in the United States are just as ignorant as their liberal European brethren, and they are at every turn trying to block the Trump administration’s travel bans, the sanctuary city punishment and the building of the wall, and if they are successful at halting the Trump initiatives the United States will be the target of additional terrorist attacks in the future. Americans must keep track of which party is trying to protect them and which party is increasing the danger of more terrorist killings and destruction, and punish the Democrats at the ballot box in the next and every subsequent election.

Democrats See The World Through A Prism Of Race

The unrelenting push and pressure by Democrats to get Donald Trump removed from the presidency is without equal. Also without equal is the racism of the Democrat Party, where every action and word from a Republican is deemed to have a devious, racist motive and meaning behind it.  No matter what Trump says, the leftists make a racial case of it and vehemently attack him and anyone else who supports him and his policies.

Turning the tables on the liberals a little, Conservatives could make a case of racism directed at  ESPN for their fantasy team auction in which black football players and auctioned off to the highest bidder, sort of like a slave auction block in the Old South. But conservatives are too sensible and know that ESPN did not mean any such thing with their tactless, on-line fantasy team auction. But just let President Trump say that all violent contributors to the Charlottesville murder are equally bad and equally condemned by him, and the “R” word is used by every liberal talking head in sight. Liberals are absolutely going insane following Hillary‘s presidential loss, and the loss of a majority in the Senate last November.

There is no event occurring in America today that doesn’t have racial meaning to Democrats. And just as the squawking liberals lost the public argument by illogically blaming Ronald Reagan for the spread of AIDS in the 80s, so will liberals and Democrats lose the current battle for the public’s heart by resorting to charges of racism when trying to politically injure Donald Trump.

It takes courage to be a conservative  today, but we will win the battle for America’s constitutional liberties, and Democrats will lose more elections as their deranged actions drive sensible people away from the Democrat Party.

Trump’s Latest Lesson, Learned From The Radical Liberal Left

Following the Charlottesville tragedy President Trump made a completely appropriate, timely, well-expressed statement about the death in that city and condemned the warring groups making life miserable for the citizens of the city. The radical mouthpieces  on the American left dutifully responded to Trump’s statement by telling him that his words were not sufficient and then dictated to him the words and the script that he must repeat in order for them to credit him with a proper presidential statement.

Trump then made the statement the radicals demanded, and guess what happened? The radical Democrat leaders said that his statement was not sincere, that it was coerced, that the revised statement was given too late, that they would not accept the statement, yada, yada.

The lesson for our president is that he should never do what his leftist enemies (and I do mean enemies, because these fool, hate-filled people are trying to forcibly remove Trump from the White House and invalidate the most recent presidential election) tell him to do. No matter what he says, no matter what he does, and especially if he uses words and phrases they tell him to use, they will not stop hating him and trying to removed him from office.

President Trump has been miraculously successful by being himself, and that’s exactly what he should continue to be.

The Times We Live In Are Transitory

As good old Bob Dylan once said: “The times, they are a-changin’”. And, indeed they are.

Nothing remains the same: families buy a new house and relocate; children grow up and move away; parents retire and die. But these are things that are customary and expected in life and we accept them as they unfold.

However, there are many things that change that we would never have imagined: the miraculous iPhone revolution; medical miracles; the massive invasion of our nation by illegal immigrants; same-sex marriage; cars that drive, park and brake themselves.

But the things that are most interesting and important for our nation are the social/political things that often go nearly unnoticed and that we rarely see the future ramifications of.

One enormous event that has already stunned the nation, brought about changes with many unforeseen results yet to come of them is the election of Donald Trump to the White House. His policies have already slowed the illegal immigration influx to a trickle of there recent number. His sanctuary city policies are upsetting illegal liberal Democrat fiefdoms across the nation. His intention to eliminate ISIS has been remarkably successful. His halting of all future plans for the lie of warming/change have shocked the liberal establishment. His willingness to fight back against a lying, liberal press will change the nation for years to come.

The unfounded liberal attacks on Trump of both a political and personal nature concerning the lie of a Russian collusion, will undermine Democrat power and influence for years to come as the facts are revealed, and as the plot to eliminate a duly elected president are understood by more and more American citizens, the Democrats will suffer in the minds of thinking people.

Internationally, Trump’s stand against the threats from North Korea, which the previous three presidencies would not seriously engage, will work in America’s favor for years to come, especially when Iran pulls the same stunt as Kim Jong Un and tries to blackmail America with the nukes that Obama allowed them to develop and gave them the money to pay for.

The times are indeed changin’, and we ain’t seen nothing’ yet.

Trump Is Tone Deaf To Politically Correct Speech

As Rush Limbaugh has often said on his radio show, Donald Trump is not an ideological conservative. That means that when Trump speaks, he is speaking from the heart and not from political conviction. He’s a practical person who makes things work, and has no time for politics or political posturing.

Following the Charlottesville demonstration and the terrible loss of life there, he issued a very appropriate statement in which he condemned the killer and the demonstration organizers for their philosophy and motives.

Then, per the plan, leftists said that he wasn’t sincere in his statement because he didn’t use the politically correct words and the leftist-acceptable phrases in his initial statement. But it doesn’t matter what Trump says nor how and when he says it, liberals will always criticize him and claim that he should have said something else, and, as in the case of Charlottesville, they’ll blame him for both the demonstration and any negative result that comes from it.

Although we expect the radical, Trump-hating left to object to Trump’s words, when the likes of Glenn Beck criticize Trump for not using the correct, left-approved words to express his dismay and shock at the violence and loss of life, the criticism has gone too far.

Don’t people like Beck, who generally agree with Trump and his political and economic objectives, realize that they play into the radical left’s hands by attacking Trump, and for not praising the heart-felt words Trump uttered soon after the event? Beck and all other Republicans should tell the leftists to stuff their politically motivated demands in their Elizabeth Warren peace-pipes and smoke them.

Charlottesville Will Be A Crisis That The Left Will Not Let Go To Waste

The police in Charlottesville stood-down in spite of the fact that the Democrat Governor of Virginia and the Democrat Mayor of Charlottesville suspected danger loomed as the white supremacists and Black Lives Matter groups prepared for a confrontation. There were no Republicans or conservatives included in the Virginia decision process to allow the event to go forward, yet Republicans and President Trump are at the top of the leftist’s blame list. So why did the Democrats allow the groups to face-off and become violent?

In consideration of the fact that the day following the violence only the radical left spokespersons are running their mouths and blaming Trump for the tragedy that occurred on the weekend, and the usual gutless Republican never-Trumpers are joining the Democrats in blaming Trump, it appears that all of Trump’s enemies are making this one of those crises that they will not allow to go to waste, thinking that it would be a shame to allow a good anti-Trump story to go untold, even it it‘s a lie.

The left’s constant drumbeat against Trump will not be allowed to end as long as the leftist press can contort the facts of Charlottesville or any other event to make Trump look bad. But to the contrary, most people who voted for Trump are pleased with his performance following this Democrat-induced tragedy, so I have no problem letting the establishment media rail on with their vile charges.

It would help settle matters like Charlottesville if liberals would realize that whether it’s a Black Lives Matters group or a white supremacist group, they’re both leftist, anti-constitution, violence-prone, typically Democrat, anti-American groups and they should be left to fight each other until both sides just go away. Unfortunately, while these evil groups are fighting, peaceful, decent people are caught in the middle and too often are hurt.

Once Again And Forever, Violence Is Trump’s Fault

So the Democrat Governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe,  and the Democrat Mayor of Charlottesville, Mike Signer, were both aware of the possibility of violence when a white supremacist group planned a demonstration in Charlottesville, and neither of them took adequate precautions to avoid trouble, and the inevitable happened: people got killed.

The next thing that happened was also inevitable: Trump gets blamed for the violence in a Democrat-controlled city.

It’s convenient for Democrats to forget that under the Obama administration the United States, from border to border and coast to coast, was plagued with police officer assassinations spurred and celebrated by the Black Lives Matter group, and was there any blame placed on Obama for this national disease? Of course not.

But what did Obama do to stop the police assassinations that plagued his administration? He held a little party in the White House to congratulate the Black Lives Matters group for helping him to “fundamentally transform America” with their racist acts and parades. And then his Department of Justice nationalized many American city police departments, because, don’t you see, it was the police officers who were causing the problems across the country, not the BLM group and other leftist radical extremists.

One hears that the Charlottesville problem was caused by Nazi-pretend groups. But one must remember that the Nazis were leftist, extremist groups who wanted government control over all industry and over all healthcare, just like America’s Democrat Party wants such control. And also don’t forget that blocked school-house doors in Alabama,  the dogs used to control protesters in Selma, and the KKK hoods seen all over the south, and all were under the political control of Democrats, so let the truth be known, and let the chips fall where they may.

Is North Korea The Mouse That Roared, or Is Kim Jong Un Just Nuts?

Whether Kim Jong Un wants more foreign aid and stuff from America or he’s just plain gone nuts from being an unquestioned and total dictator since he was 27 years old, he has made threats against Guam, Hawaii and the mainland U.S. and therefore cannot be ignored. President Trump is handling him correctly, because to not take Kim’s word that he can and will deliver destruction and death to America would be foolishness.

North Korea has launched actual missiles, not just braggadocios talk about being a threat, while President Trump has only offered words in retaliation to Kim’s aggressive actions, so of course the liberal lying press is placing the blame for our current problems not with the North Korean dictatorship but with Trump, and they are making Trump the heavy while Kim skates.

Should our president wait until a live and armed missile is launched and kills Americans before he acts? That was what Trump’s predecessors in the Oval Office did. How many Americans need to be killed before the press thinks the president should take action? Fortunately, President Trump is above worrying about what American liberals and Democrats say about his actions and his words. He’s taking appropriate action to guard against a rogue state causing destruction and death, and that’s why he was elected to the White House.

One thing is certain, Kim will not be able to say he was not warned of the consequences he will receive from Trump if he performs some violent act that threatens America, South Korea or Japan. President Trump has laid it out plain and simple and in no uncertain words that dangerous territory is being trod upon and it had better stop.

Is The Trump Collusion Lie Just A Democrat Diversion To Hide More Serious Things?

Is the Trump/Russia collusion lie itself a cover-up and a diversionary effort to prevent discovering the dealings, corruption and the parties that were the reason why Hillary lost the presidential election to Trump?

It’s certainly allowed the Special prosecutor to dig into Trump’s personal and business life, places far from the lie of Russian collusion that was the alleged reason for the investigation in the first place, and unrelated to the last election and any lapses in behavior that may have occurred there. But since the political left wants to cast Trump from office anyway, the appointing of the special prosecutor under false premises was a good way for the Democrats to get at Trump and gather testimony and data that can harm him, while being able, with the hate-Trump media’s anxious assistance, to prevent any investigation into the forces that really caused Hillary’s defeat.

The United States is looking more like a banana republic all the time with the media producing no news that’s not false news, the press being constitutionally protected for spiking the news that the public needs to hear, and the disregard the press has for a duly elected president who is sincere about returning the U.S. to its former greatness but is blindly opposed by the ruling-class rubble at CNN and The New York Times who insist on his personal and political destruction.

The United States is prospering under the Trump administration, but if the Democrats and leftist media are successful in ending the Trump presidency prematurely, the future for our constitutional freedoms and for our continued prosperity look bleakly dim.

Trump Re-Thinks America’s Response to Foreign Dictator Threats

Who can ever forget England’s Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, who in 1938 introduced the agreement he called a plan for “peace in our time” in  response to Hitler’s invasion of Czechoslovakia? This passive, liberal deal, with Hitler paying no price at all for his aggression, led directly to World War II and its massive toll of death and destruction. But liberals like Chamberlain only consider the marvelous press they’ll get today for any agreement designed to settle any current matters, and they never look to the future and the precedent and problems that today’s agreements may cause future generations

One could argue that JFK gave into Fidel Castro and assured Communist totalitarian rule over Cuba when he aborted the Bay of Pigs invasion of that island following Castro’s takeover.

Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama each spent two administrations patting themselves on the back for kicking the North Korean can further down the road and telling the American public that each new kick was a “good deal” for America and would assure peace and a nuclear-free North Korea. Today we understand the foolishness of  all those years of pretending that North Korea would behave like a responsible government instead of the insane leadership it’s always had and still has today. The three presidencies preceding the Trump administration were irresponsible for allowing the North Koreans to developed nuclear and missile technology to their current level, and today this irresponsibility has delivered the world to the point where many nations in the world are threatened by Kim Jong-Un’s insane missile launch/test program and the weapons he claims he will use against them.

And, of course, along with Obama’s allowing North Korea to continue to develop nukes that have led to the very real threat of the North Koreans launching a nuclear missile at America that we are dealing with today, Obama assured that in a few years another nuclear power, Iran, will be threatening us all over again, because liberals are too stupid to understand the existence of real evil in the world and they don’t have the courage to oppose it. And our Barry went one step further by giving the Mullahs in Iran a cargo jet full of cash so as to help them pay for any future nuclear development they may desire.

The only thing liberal administrations create when dealing with evil foreign governments is an assurance of future threats and likely misery and suffering of future generations because they are too weak-willed to stand up to threats and instead want to be seen as playing nice and being non-threatening to the dictators.

But now we have a real man in the White House who is strong enough to not take any crap from North Korea, and the American liberal press is swooning at his hard stance against Pyongyang’s nuclear threats. And just watch; if military action is the outcome of Trump’s hard stance against fat little Kim, liberals will all blame Trump for the conflict, not the passive presidents before him who took zero action to prevent today’s very real threat, and certainly not Kim Jong-Un, because there‘s no domestic political gain to be had in blaming him for the troubles he‘s caused.

When you are dealing with liberals, there is no way to win, ever.

Trump’s Guilt Is: Being President While Republican

The always-willing-to-allow-diversity Democrats seem to be stuck on “NO” where Donald Trump is concerned. No one must be allowed to reverse the Obama “fundamental transformation of America”, and no one will be allowed to undo the Washington establishment’s choke-hold on what goes on in our nation’s capital.

Trump, as well as surprising Democrats with his honesty, energy and persistence in getting things done for the American people, is also shocking Republicans when he insists that his promise to get rid of Obamacare was said in complete honesty, and that he wants it accomplished.

Trump is an honest, sincere man who keeps his word, means what he says and insists on taking action against bad ideas and bad people; therefore he‘s a bad president in the minds of CNN, Democrats in general, and too many Republicans in the U.S. legislative swamp in Washington..

Rahm Emanuel Creates A Crisis He Can’t Take Advantage Of

One will fondly remember at the beginning of the Obama administration when Rohm Emanuel, then Obama’s White House Chief of Staff, expressed the dark philosophy of letting no crisis go to waste.

This typical radical Democrat method of gaining power via crises and doing whatever they want to do, allowed the Obama administration to create one crisis after another (healthcare, Syrian refugees, sexual identity, immigration) and then apply a radical, leftist solution to each problem they identified as a crisis, thereby creating a new and worse crisis with each initiative as the radical fix was put in place. And then a newer solution was needed for the most recent crisis, and so on throughout the Obama administration.

Rohm Emanuel is the liberal Democrat Mayor of Chicago, a city literally going down in flames as record-setting murders are committed in that sanctuary city. Los Angeles and New York city combined don’t even approach the level of crimes committed in Chicago, and our Rohm is the reason for the crisis with his radical ideas, his lack of courage and his unwillingness to enforce the laws of the city and punish the bad guys.

So now Mr. Emanuel is trying to use his idea of identifying a crisis and getting enough momentum to make even more radical, destructive changes, by swearing to sue the Trump Department of Justice for withholding funds that Trump’s Attorney General said would be denied Chicago if they insisted on continuing their sanctuary city policy and break federal law in doing so.

Mayor Emanuel is dealing with a different breed of animal with the Trump administration, and I don’t believe he will win this battle with the principled, logical opinions of the Trump White House and DOJ. Chicago’s liberal politicians have created a crisis in that city that will destroy the reputations of the Democrats who created it forever.

Times have changed with the passing of the Obama administration, and the crises that liberals created during the Obama years will now be taken advantage of by the likes of President Trump to defeat Democrats and their radical ideas.

Eric Bolling Is Being Destroyed Because Of His Political Stand

Bill Clinton actually sexually abused a White House intern, in the Oval Office, and was believably accused by another woman of beating her after a sexual attack, and the liberals loved and defended our Billy to the bitter end.

But now, with no doubt as to the political implications behind it, Eric Bolling of Fox News, has been suspended after being accused of years ago sending lewd emails to some female employees of Fox. Is it any coincidence that Bolling just published a book, rated number one on the New York Times best seller list, defending Donald Trump? And is it any coincidence that Bolling is an out-spoken conservative and a highly followed and influential member of the Fox news team?

Hillary can break laws that possibly got Americans killed when she broke federal laws about email systems when she was Secretary of State; Bill Clinton can have ruined a young woman’s life by seducing her in the Oval Office; Loretta Lynch can have colluded with Bill Clinton and settled the Hillary FBI investigation before it went to a Grand Jury; Hillary can have given away American Uranium in exchange for millions of dollars in Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation; Lois Lerner can have made decisions that excluded Republicans as a class from campaigning against Obama in past elections, but just let some liberal women pretend to have been offended years ago by receiving some emails, and all hell breaks lose for the Conservative, while the Democrats whistle off down the lane and continue their efforts to “Fundamentally Transform America”.

Bolling is being persecuted for being conservative, persuasive and successful, and like Trump, his revisionist ideas are poison to America’s establishment liberals. One strongly suspects that the reports about Bolling’s behavior are fake, lying news and this event is a further indictment of the entity reporting the lie and also indicts the D.C. liberal establishment who must lie in order to win, because they are losing elections every time they run.

Where in the hell is common sense in America today?

Was Hillary Ignorant Of The Law, Or Did She Willfully Ignore The Law?

The absurdity of what James Comey said on July 5, 2016, when he justified in public his decision to NOT send the Hillary investigation to a Grand Jury still rankles. He said that she did not intend to break the law, and that minus intent there was no crime. We’ve had similar cases of a non-intentional breaking of the law recently, one involving a sailor who simply took pictures of a Naval vehicle, like anyone would do when in the position of a tourist, and he went to jail for it. On a personal level, how many people have been ticketed for speeding with no intention of exceeding the posted speed limit? Answer: everyone who has ever been ticketed.

The fact of the matter is that Hillary was so intent on handling Clinton Foundation emails in which she was getting influence peddling bids as she doled out favors for cash from her position of Secretary of State for the Obama administration (much of which cash was from foreign sources and at least one of which was from Russian sources who were the highest bidders for American Uranium supplies and duly kicked back millions of dollars to the Clinton Fund when they were awarded the deal) that she bypassed the normal security and administrative checks built into the federal email system, and she ignored rules she had enforced on her State Department subordinates, and broke the law in doing so. The casual observer would conclude that she very well knew the law, but grubbing for money from foreign leaders who wanted favors from Hillary once she became president was her sole concentration.

I have no doubt that Hillary did not consciously intend to break the law, but what she did was known to her to be contrary to the laws that she herself had enforced within the State Department, so one sees no difference between intent and actually going ahead and doing the deed. If she had been under the influence of a drug or had been blackmailed to do it there may be a distinction to be made on those counts, but there was too much involved to make her email scandal happen, and there were too many highly secure emails sent and mishandled by her, for the FBI to merely say “never mind” and close the case.

The Trump Justice Department needs to prosecute Hillary, and the Obama administration provided all the evidence they need to get the Grand Jury involved, NOW

Just Do It, Mr. President!

When one thinks about the unbelievable and unprecedented attacks on President Trump, and the dangerous leaks that have been published about his official actions as president, one recalls the campaign policy decision that Trump made that set his administration apart from Obama’s: candidate Trump said that announcing in detail and in advance, the military actions to be taken against one of our national enemies, which Obama loved to do, would stop when he became president. Whether it was ISIS or an enemy tribe in Afghanistan, Obama loved to announce to the American public, and the enemy, when he would attack, where he would attack and the force he would use to do it. President Trump wisely decided to just hit the enemy, not tell them he was coming after them, and especially not tell them when to expect an attack.

So why, then, would Attorney General Jeff Sessions not use the same policy against the Trump administration’s domestic political and policy enemies in the D.C. swamp?

Last weekend Jeff Session announced that any more leaks from Trump’s enemies in the White House or the State Department or any other entity performing a leak of classified or privileged information, would be punished to the full extent of the law. Duh! Do people breaking the law, especially those enemies of the president who want to disrupt his presidency and undermine his power, really need a heads-up that there could be some adverse actions taken against them for leaking this information? If an otherwise upstanding American citizen exceeds the speed limit they get a ticket, not a warning that such an action will be punished if it’s done a week from now. This is absurd!

But for some reason the higher on the food chain a crime is committed the less punishment the criminal can expect, and that’s why the leaks have continued: there has been no punishment for these evil-doers whose leaks could get Americans killed or undermine international relations. Why aren’t these leakers immediately discovered,  arrested and put on trial?  And is it legally necessary that they be told of possible imprisonment a week before the government can take action on their illegal acts?

And why is Hillary not in jail already? Former FBI Director James Comey has already provided the nation with a list of the crimes the FBI has already investigated and knows Hillary committed with her email problems, so why hasn’t the Justice Department not formed a Grand Jury and prepared the case and sought a prison sentence against Hillary? After all, it was the Obama administration that investigated her, so political partisanship is out of the question. And why has former Attorney General, Loretta Lynch not been investigated for meeting with Bill Clinton  and discussing the Hillary investigation? And what about Debbie Wasserman Schultz and her crimes related to the Pakistani national she was so cozy with? And what about Lois Lerner, who was the IRS official who crushed Republican plans to campaign against Obama in past presidential elections? These are all Democrat criminals who have broken the law and are being allowed to skate free, while at the same time Donald Trump is being investigated for who-the-hell-knows-what-crime (but we do know it’s not for anything related to the lie of Russian collusion) by Robert Mueller?

The Trump administration itself appointed a Special Council to investigate the president where no known illegality exists, but they will not investigate their sworn enemies who would do anything, tell any lie and commit any illegal act to get rid of Trump and his family.

My advice to President Trump and Attorney General Sessions: Don’t announce legal actions against leakers and other crooks and enemies of your administration: JUST FREAKING DO IT!!!

Obama’s Radicalism Compared With Trump’s Main-Stream Common Sense

Considering Obama’s motto of  the “fundamental transformation of America” (FTA), compared with Trump’s MAGA, I pose the following observations:

When Obama swore at his presidential acceptance speech to Fundamentally Transform America, the liberal press swooned and exclaimed that this evil, racist, sexist, capitalist nation was going to finally get its due.

But when Donald Trump stated that he will Make America Great Again and then quickly after taking office established policies to make his statements come true, the liberal press loses its cookies and screams and yells as though the sky were falling.

It’s obvious that not only did the liberal press love Obama and trust him to make the radical changes that they admire, but it’s equally obvious that they agreed with those radical, liberal policies that hurt people when they lost their own healthcare coverage to Obamacare and in the process hurt small business owners who had spent years establishing businesses and abiding with ever-encroaching environmental regulations and tax laws that kept changing the way they did business, thereby placing their businesses at risk. Liberals seem to forget that hurting small businesses only assures that the large companies that liberals pretend to hate, with teams of tax specialists and offices full of high-priced lawyers, would be more prosperous and successful as their smaller competitors flailed and went out of business, and this disregard for small businesses places the hourly and salaried workers employed with those smaller companies at risk of losing their jobs if the company suffers financial set-backs.

When Trump wants to keep illegal aliens out of the country and wants to assure employment to low-wage workers by opposing minimum wage laws, and when he puts a halt to the bilking of the American tax payer via Climate Change agreements with the scoundrels at the United Nations, liberals panic and go ballistic.

The problem is that liberals lack the ability to perform a real evaluation of what policies are good or bad for America, and that the only judgment they make on these competing policies is based on whether a Democrat or a Republican makes the decision to implement the policy. That partisan frame of mind is a dangerous position for the nation to be in, because neither party has a monopoly on what policies are right or wrong, aside from their liberal or conservative political philosophy. It takes more time and some real critical thinking to be able to serve the nation well, and the ability to weigh all sides of an issue is foreign to liberals.

Do Elections Have Consequences? Should They?

One will doubtless remember when President Obama called Republicans together shortly after his election and scolded them for opposing any of his policies by reminding them that elections have consequences. He was, in other words, telling them to shut up and sit down because he was going to run Washington from that point on with every intention of “fundamentally transforming America“, and he did.

Now skip forward a few years and we have Donald Trump in the Oval Office. Would you think that the fact that Trump was elected president would cause the liberal press or the Democrat legislators to sit back and let Trump activate his policies as he promised to do? Not a chance in the world. The Washington establishment is so threatened by Trump’s ideas, and they became so spoiled by the radical leftist ideas and policies of the Obama administration, that they are almost literally having heart attacks opposing every move Trump makes to turn America around to being prosperous again. And this opposition to everything Trump proposes is also the Democrats sticking a finger in the eye of every American who voted for Trump for president in an attempt to nullify their vote.

The only redeeming quality to America’s current political situation is that Democrats are still quoting the same old crap that caused Hillary to lose the election to Trump, and at all levels of government the Democrats are still losing to Republicans. Just a few days ago the Democrat Governor of West Virginia, a traditionally Democrat state, change his party affiliation and became a Republican. The amusing thing about such political flipping is that the east coast liberal press doesn’t seem to be able to ever admit that liberals are losing to conservatives because they are following old outmoded ideas that no longer appeal to Americans after eight years of the subversive Obama, and instead they revert to name-calling of their former party-members, as they did with West Virginia voters, who they now call uneducated, dumb, lazy and unable to speak proper English, because they, as a state, voted for Donald Trump to be president. Do liberal Democrats not understand the term “burning one’s bridges”?

No reasonable person would ever say that, following an election, the winning party should be able to dictate all policy and implement the winner’s every wish, but to oppose every and all of Trump’s ideas and attack him personally as well as politically all day, every day, is way beyond what elections are all about.  In 2016 Americans voted their dismay with Obama’s leftist, anti-capitalist, regulatory leanings and voted for the non-establishment candidacy of Donald Trump, and now leftists, in true dictatorial style, want the deny the electorate their victory.

CNN’s Jim Acosta Steps In It

On Wednesday, while attending a White House press briefing, CNN’s Jim Acosta was predictably bitching and moaning about the latest Trump policy, this one involving limiting legal immigration into the U.S., by stating that only immigrants from Australia or England would be allowed to immigrate under the new requirement of having to be able to speak English, Senior White House Advisor, Stephen Miller, unleashed a beautiful response for Acosta’s “cosmopolitan”, and I would say upper-class-society-arrogance, by reminding Mr. Acosta that many people the world-over speak excellent English and that his remarks were a little out of date in a world that Mr. Acosta may not be fully aware of, where English is often spoken, and not all of the rest of the world is poor and uneducated.

Mr. Acosta also complained that the new immigration rules are out of step with the Statue of Liberty, but he forgets that the United States remains a sovereign nation and those seeking entrance must abide by our rules. The Statue of Liberty was never intended to assure anyone who wants to come here immediate passage.

Although I anticipate that some conservatives will not like Mr. Miller’s quick and cutting response to Acosta’s upper-class remark, I would like to hear more such biting comebacks from White House staff to the lying, phony press who only exist to attack Trump and his policies. Mr. Miller took it to the bastard, leftist press representative, and I loved it.

When Barack Obama disregarded American laws that he promised to uphold at the swearing-in ceremony as he became president, and when he trashed the laws of the nation and his constitutional duty to protect the citizens of America by allowing illegal aliens to pass into our nation en mass with no checks at all, we citizens were expected to just sit back and suck it up as our nation was being invaded and our liberty and safety was threatened. But when Donald Trump wants to legally and responsibly control the flow of foreigners entering America you’d think he had ordered immigrants to be lined up on Ellis Island and be shot.

The press corps attended the Stephen Miller briefing NOT to learn what President Trump’s immigration policy is, but to blindly object to it, no matter what it was.

Go Donald, and go Stephen Miller!

If There Is Chaos In The White House, It’s The Fault Of The Lying Press

As though there is not enough for a new president-elect to do and not enough staff to do it as a new administration takes office, and this is especially true when the new president is not a politician and does not know how the Washington establishment functions, one has to appreciate the extra burden the newly-elected Donald Trump faced when he was and still is daily, and at times hourly, attacked and lied about by the Trump-hating liberal press.

Not a single day goes by when there are not outright attacks on Trump or members of his staff and family. And it’s not sufficient to say that these attacks just toughen him up and make him stronger. The attacks the leftist press heap on Trump are career-ending and reputation-ending lies and viscous broadsides intended to destroy him personally and completely, and to end his presidency.

So in addition to having to establish an administration and begin implementing his policies, Trump has had to daily literally fight with the press and defend himself against the most withering odds we’ve ever seen in American politics.

The simple-minded, bullying attitude of the leftist press is making them appear totally partisan, small and just plain mean while at the same time making it more difficult for President Trump to do the things, and make the necessary changes, that he promised to do while campaigning for president.