Three years ago who would have imagined that our own government would actively seek to end our prosperity and limit our liberties? But that is exactly what the Obama administration is doing with its blocking of Boeing from manufacturing in South Carolina; its prohibition of drilling for oil off-shore; its latest multi-page set of regulations from the EPA that will cause electric generating companies to shut down coal-fired plants, increase electric fees hundreds of dollars a year and lay off hundreds of employees; by its quantitative easing which leads directly to inflation which we already see with the increased cost of food and gasoline; with the Democrat refusal to get serious about cutting government spending and abide by the constitution; by drowning businesses with damaging regulations; by suing Arizona for trying to control illegal immigration in their state; with Obama's getting us wrapped up in two additional wars on top of the two we were already fighting; with public education being destroyed by the Department of Education and its politically correct, teacher-union friendly time wasting courses ; with the FDA creating drug regulations that are causing shortages of critically needed drugs, a situation made worse with Obamacare; with the Obama administration's insistence that KSM and other terrorists be tried in civilian courts; with the Obama Justice Department's allowing voter fraud cases to go unprosecuted; by forcing our food (corn) to be used for fuel, thereby hurting poor families already strapped with high food prices.
The United States is being destroyed from within, which is something an external enemy could ever do, and our pal Barry is riding this nation to third-world status as quickly as he can. We need politicians who are not interested in political careers, but are instead interested in halting the damage being done to our nation and restoring our national pride, our liberties and our prosperity. But too many of the current batch of politicians only want to rule us and enjoy a responsibility-free career at public expense.
As a community organizer our president made a career out of demanding goodies from government, and now that he is the nation's chief executive he has the ability to hand out these goodies with virtually no limits. He has no idea how the wealth of our nation was created, and he has no concept that our wealth is finite, and if we chase off the wealth builders we may not be able to recreate our prosperous life-style, given the punitive regulations and high taxes that he has proposed and imposed, and which have driven away the builders of wealth, our entrepreneurs.
Monday, June 20, 2011
Friday, June 10, 2011
By Their Words, We Know Who They Fear
When liberals fear conservative candidates they term them as being stupid. The most successful candidate ever offered, Ronald Reagan, was called a stupid B-actor. A Republican who also won two terms as president, and is now fondly thought of, George Bush, was always called a dunce and a cowboy and laughed at for his verbal slips. And the most reviled possible candidate to date is Sarah Palin, whom the press has abused more severely than any in living memory, simply from their fear of her successful record and fear that she could win. (The liberals even go so far as to make similar references of stupidity to foreign leaders who are closely allied to America; for example their reference to Benjamin Netanyahu as Benjamin Netanyahoo).
Of course Anthony Weiner's actions are not a result of stupidity (one pundit even called his tweeting a result of intelligence because he's working on a much more elevated plain that the rest of us and he needs his outlets); John Edwards isn't called stupid for his predicament; Bill Clinton isn't called stupid in spite of his abuse of an intern and his occasional use of the back-country, Ozark term "might-could"; Barney Frank isn't called stupid for his inability to see and halt or at least control the crash of Freddie and Fannie and the whole disastrous aftermath of the housing tumble; Chris Dodd isn't called stupid for taking favored loans from the mortgage companies he was responsible for overseeing. These people's actions caused great tragedy for our nation, but are topped by Barack Obama whose every action has caused increased joblessness, homelessness, national debt and misery that will set our nation back for decades if we ever get out from under the burden with which he has loaded children, and this fool still wants more quantitative easing and continues to promise further billions in foreign loans and gifts so as to further bury us under debt and undermine the value of the dollar. But, of course, Obama is the brilliant graduate of Columbia and Harvard and his superior intelligence must be recognized and expounded upon at every opportunity. The liberals seem to have forgotten the Forrest Gump admonition that "stupid is, as stupid does", which sums up our Barry perfectly.
Just as the old Jay Leno joke had it that Burger King and McDonalds will only compare each other's products in their commercials, because they don't dare compare their products with real food, so the Democrats/liberals/progressives always offer their candidates as being more intelligent than conservatives , but they won't dare make a comparison of policy and the real-life decisions of liberals versus conservatives (the best example of this reluctance to study conservative success and liberal failure is that the lowering of taxes under Ronald Reagan, and JFK as well in an earlier time, increased revenue to the treasury, but we saw debt increase at the same time because the legislature spent money at a 3-to-1 rate over the new revenue. So it appears that Reagan's "stupid" tax reductions caused a deficit problem, when in truth it was the stupid, over-spending of the legislature, largely composed of Democrats, that caused the trouble).
Democrats and their allies in the press always try to set Republicans up for failure by praising our more middle-of-the-road candidates, thereby encouraging these weaker candidates to run. John McCain is an example, who, with the praise of the press, became a candidate who conservatives could not vigorously support, and then in the general election they savaged him in support of Obama, who was their candidate of choice all along.
Conservatives must stick to the real conservative candidates and not be suckered into another bad presidential candidate just because the press seems to favor that candidate. Because of the constant abuse of the press we know they fear Sarah Palin more than any other Republican because she's the real thing: she's had successful executive experience, unlike Obama who has seen only constant executive failures, and she knows why the things she believes are the correct policies and can explain them (lower taxes and fewer regulations, for example) unlike Obama, who doesn't have a clue why his policies are failing and destroying the futures of our grandchildren, but insists on doing more of the same destructive things that have already failed (except that I believe Obama is intentionally destroying America, and his actions can only support the notion that he has such a clear, willful, immoral intent).
So Republicans must offer their best candidates, and in fact should offer candidates whom the liberals criticize the most (perhaps a Bachman-Palin Overdrive ticket would be powerful, or a Bachman-Herman Cain ticket, either of which would combine legislative and executive experience) but whomever the candidate is for 2012, we must not go again with a McCain candidate whom the liberals say would be easy for them to work with. We need to defeat liberals, not work with them. A McCain-like candidate is the path to defeat in 2012, and an Obama re-election in 2012 would be the certain destruction of this nation.
Of course Anthony Weiner's actions are not a result of stupidity (one pundit even called his tweeting a result of intelligence because he's working on a much more elevated plain that the rest of us and he needs his outlets); John Edwards isn't called stupid for his predicament; Bill Clinton isn't called stupid in spite of his abuse of an intern and his occasional use of the back-country, Ozark term "might-could"; Barney Frank isn't called stupid for his inability to see and halt or at least control the crash of Freddie and Fannie and the whole disastrous aftermath of the housing tumble; Chris Dodd isn't called stupid for taking favored loans from the mortgage companies he was responsible for overseeing. These people's actions caused great tragedy for our nation, but are topped by Barack Obama whose every action has caused increased joblessness, homelessness, national debt and misery that will set our nation back for decades if we ever get out from under the burden with which he has loaded children, and this fool still wants more quantitative easing and continues to promise further billions in foreign loans and gifts so as to further bury us under debt and undermine the value of the dollar. But, of course, Obama is the brilliant graduate of Columbia and Harvard and his superior intelligence must be recognized and expounded upon at every opportunity. The liberals seem to have forgotten the Forrest Gump admonition that "stupid is, as stupid does", which sums up our Barry perfectly.
Just as the old Jay Leno joke had it that Burger King and McDonalds will only compare each other's products in their commercials, because they don't dare compare their products with real food, so the Democrats/liberals/progressives always offer their candidates as being more intelligent than conservatives , but they won't dare make a comparison of policy and the real-life decisions of liberals versus conservatives (the best example of this reluctance to study conservative success and liberal failure is that the lowering of taxes under Ronald Reagan, and JFK as well in an earlier time, increased revenue to the treasury, but we saw debt increase at the same time because the legislature spent money at a 3-to-1 rate over the new revenue. So it appears that Reagan's "stupid" tax reductions caused a deficit problem, when in truth it was the stupid, over-spending of the legislature, largely composed of Democrats, that caused the trouble).
Democrats and their allies in the press always try to set Republicans up for failure by praising our more middle-of-the-road candidates, thereby encouraging these weaker candidates to run. John McCain is an example, who, with the praise of the press, became a candidate who conservatives could not vigorously support, and then in the general election they savaged him in support of Obama, who was their candidate of choice all along.
Conservatives must stick to the real conservative candidates and not be suckered into another bad presidential candidate just because the press seems to favor that candidate. Because of the constant abuse of the press we know they fear Sarah Palin more than any other Republican because she's the real thing: she's had successful executive experience, unlike Obama who has seen only constant executive failures, and she knows why the things she believes are the correct policies and can explain them (lower taxes and fewer regulations, for example) unlike Obama, who doesn't have a clue why his policies are failing and destroying the futures of our grandchildren, but insists on doing more of the same destructive things that have already failed (except that I believe Obama is intentionally destroying America, and his actions can only support the notion that he has such a clear, willful, immoral intent).
So Republicans must offer their best candidates, and in fact should offer candidates whom the liberals criticize the most (perhaps a Bachman-Palin Overdrive ticket would be powerful, or a Bachman-Herman Cain ticket, either of which would combine legislative and executive experience) but whomever the candidate is for 2012, we must not go again with a McCain candidate whom the liberals say would be easy for them to work with. We need to defeat liberals, not work with them. A McCain-like candidate is the path to defeat in 2012, and an Obama re-election in 2012 would be the certain destruction of this nation.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
Is Anthony Weiner Still In Congress? If So, why?
The filth and ultra-partisanship that is Anthony Weiner finally hit an iceberg that should be sinking his ship, but because he's a liberal Democrat he'll probably stay afloat and survive, but we can't let that happen. This dirty man is part of the problem our nation is having with over-spending, unconstitutional conduct and arrogant ruling and regulating, and we must make our voices heard and force him out. Just consider what happened with Chris Lee and Mark Foley, both Republicans and both exposed with less horrific conduct than Weiner, and Weiner skips while they resigned in shame.
Our nation is sinking under debt and misconduct by our officials that is unbelievable and Anthony Weiner demonstrates the stupidity, arrogance and lack of thought that has caused the current mess we're in. We must call and email our representatives and tell them that Weiner's conduct and probable use of official government facilities for his escapades calls for his removal.
To think that liberal/progressive fools like Weiner are the people deciding the future of this great nation and the prosperity or doom of our children!!
Our nation is sinking under debt and misconduct by our officials that is unbelievable and Anthony Weiner demonstrates the stupidity, arrogance and lack of thought that has caused the current mess we're in. We must call and email our representatives and tell them that Weiner's conduct and probable use of official government facilities for his escapades calls for his removal.
To think that liberal/progressive fools like Weiner are the people deciding the future of this great nation and the prosperity or doom of our children!!
Saturday, May 28, 2011
What's Wrong With America?
Common sense would tell a responsible person that the way our nation has traditionally been run (limited, restrained government, few regulations on individuals and businesses, adherence to the constitution, allowing the drilling for our own sources of fuel on our own land and in our won waters, spending sensibly within a budget) causes the least pain for the population at large, leads to a lower cost of living for the population and facilitates a low unemployment rate.
On the other hand, the last 2 years under Obama and his radical accomplices have proven to reasonable people that big, expansive, expensive, highly regulated government has produced increased costs to the population less liberty, more personal suffering and a higher unemployment rate. But of course the people who have cause this turn of events can't understand the obvious point being made. Setting aside arguments that liberals seek personal power and control, and that they are short-sighted and can't imagine the results of the power they take from the citizens under their personal control, it's as though liberals feel they have to ration freedom and prosperity for fear it will be consumed too quickly and become exhausted, when the truth is that freedom is inexhaustible if government would get our of the way and let people seek their own destinies (similar to Ayn Rand's "The Virtue Of Selfishness"). But liberal administrations hole the reins too tightly, and where they rule, people suffer.
The principle that freedom is inexhaustible also applies to prosperity, which liberals also want to control and limit. America has proven beyond any doubt the a growing population can also be an increasingly prosperous population if government will leave the people alone to run their own lives and regulate with a light hand. Liberals cling to their bitter opinions that prosperity is finite and must be doled out by the enlightened government, but this only assures that citizens of such a state will all live in equal squalor. Obama, his liberal pals and his administration's agencies and departments have seemingly gleefully reduced our liberties, caused our daily expenses to increase, caused fuel to become more costly and more limited, caused retirement and personal savings to lose value, caused unemployment to increase drastically and seemingly without end, have raped our legislative process with their lies and bribes for votes, and seem intent on doing more damage to this great nation in the future.
The main point is that there are too many elected members of our government who really want to rule instead of serve. What our nation needs is the old tradition of the "butcher, the baker and the candlestick maker" going off to serve the nation by legislating only as necessary, do no damage to the nation, and return home to live under the laws they passed while in government.
What happened to the ideals of public service instead of the current personal greed of our elected bodies? What happened to the ideal of assuring that future generations will be free and prosperous instead of spending beyond reason and enriching ourselves today at the expense of tomorrow and the enormous cost to our children and grandchildren? Our nation has lost its way, and it the voters don't wake up and vote for sensible people to represent them, we'll lose our nation as well.
On the other hand, the last 2 years under Obama and his radical accomplices have proven to reasonable people that big, expansive, expensive, highly regulated government has produced increased costs to the population less liberty, more personal suffering and a higher unemployment rate. But of course the people who have cause this turn of events can't understand the obvious point being made. Setting aside arguments that liberals seek personal power and control, and that they are short-sighted and can't imagine the results of the power they take from the citizens under their personal control, it's as though liberals feel they have to ration freedom and prosperity for fear it will be consumed too quickly and become exhausted, when the truth is that freedom is inexhaustible if government would get our of the way and let people seek their own destinies (similar to Ayn Rand's "The Virtue Of Selfishness"). But liberal administrations hole the reins too tightly, and where they rule, people suffer.
The principle that freedom is inexhaustible also applies to prosperity, which liberals also want to control and limit. America has proven beyond any doubt the a growing population can also be an increasingly prosperous population if government will leave the people alone to run their own lives and regulate with a light hand. Liberals cling to their bitter opinions that prosperity is finite and must be doled out by the enlightened government, but this only assures that citizens of such a state will all live in equal squalor. Obama, his liberal pals and his administration's agencies and departments have seemingly gleefully reduced our liberties, caused our daily expenses to increase, caused fuel to become more costly and more limited, caused retirement and personal savings to lose value, caused unemployment to increase drastically and seemingly without end, have raped our legislative process with their lies and bribes for votes, and seem intent on doing more damage to this great nation in the future.
The main point is that there are too many elected members of our government who really want to rule instead of serve. What our nation needs is the old tradition of the "butcher, the baker and the candlestick maker" going off to serve the nation by legislating only as necessary, do no damage to the nation, and return home to live under the laws they passed while in government.
What happened to the ideals of public service instead of the current personal greed of our elected bodies? What happened to the ideal of assuring that future generations will be free and prosperous instead of spending beyond reason and enriching ourselves today at the expense of tomorrow and the enormous cost to our children and grandchildren? Our nation has lost its way, and it the voters don't wake up and vote for sensible people to represent them, we'll lose our nation as well.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
How To Determine When To Believe Barry's Lies
Barack Obama is a liar, pure and simple. But when he makes statements about increasing taxes, causing electric rates to "necessarily sky-rocket", increase regulations on businesses causing business failures and increased unemployment, or when he makes a statement contrary to Israel's or our own national security, you'd better believe him, because our Barry hates everything that's traditional, good and successful about this great nation, and he and his administration are actively trying to destroy us.
This means that when he stated recently that Israel must go back to its 1967 "lines" (which would mean its destruction at the hands of its Arab foes), he was telling the truth, in spite of the fact that our president insists he's a dedicated friend and defender of Israel.
Related to this convoluted logic is his hate for the CIA and their methods (which allowed the gathering of information which lead to Barry's heroic I-ME-MINE success in killing Osama, then telling the agency and the SEALS how much he respects their efforts while at the same time prosecuting the CIA agents who collected the information that made it all possible). It would not be surprising to learn that Obama's Attorney General has brought court martial charges against one of the SEALS who shot Osama because he slapped Osama before he shot him, because after all we must maintain America's traditional values, says our Barry.
And when Obama states that our borders are more secure than ever, we know our fool president is lying because that subject relates to U.S. security, which he is actively undermining and weakening. When Barry talks about the impoverishment and destruction of America, you can bet he's telling the truth about his intentions.
This means that when he stated recently that Israel must go back to its 1967 "lines" (which would mean its destruction at the hands of its Arab foes), he was telling the truth, in spite of the fact that our president insists he's a dedicated friend and defender of Israel.
Related to this convoluted logic is his hate for the CIA and their methods (which allowed the gathering of information which lead to Barry's heroic I-ME-MINE success in killing Osama, then telling the agency and the SEALS how much he respects their efforts while at the same time prosecuting the CIA agents who collected the information that made it all possible). It would not be surprising to learn that Obama's Attorney General has brought court martial charges against one of the SEALS who shot Osama because he slapped Osama before he shot him, because after all we must maintain America's traditional values, says our Barry.
And when Obama states that our borders are more secure than ever, we know our fool president is lying because that subject relates to U.S. security, which he is actively undermining and weakening. When Barry talks about the impoverishment and destruction of America, you can bet he's telling the truth about his intentions.
Friday, May 20, 2011
Walking Back Political Radicalism: Obama In Retreat, Sort Of
The foolish and radical Obama administration is making deceitful decisions that appear to be retreating from their former ultra-radical positions, but only after they've taken much criticism and abuse.
Reports claim that Obama is permitting drilling once again in the gulf and is withdrawing some regulations that the EPA was planning to dump on our economy, but only under political pressure; the administration has decided not to have a public trial for KSM after political pressure; and Obama has decided that sanctions may be necessary against Syria and its killing of its own citizens (remember how Hillary recently claimed that Bashar Al-Assad was a reformer?). Although these things seem to indicate that Obama may be behaving more sensibly, they never would have happened if an election were not on the horizon and if he weren't hurting in the polls.
To even arrive at the numerous radical positions of the Obama administration indicates a lack of intelligence and common sense, and then to change positions under pressure shows that politics and power is all he cares about. Imagine how destructive the Obama administration would be if an election were not to be held soon, then imagine what Obama would do if he were re-elected for 4 more years. The damage a radical like him could do is nearly total.
But the true nature of Obama was recently seen when he stated that Israel should reduce its size and retreat to former "lines", allowing Palestinians to take land from Israel. The land that Obama wants Israel to forfeit was gained following attacks on Israel by Arab forces, and Israel has every right to hold these lands and increase its own security as a result.
There is no way that a strong Obama would ever retreat from his radical, ultra-leftist positions on the economy and his opposition to Israel, and our child president must be opposed at all times and on all fronts.
Reports claim that Obama is permitting drilling once again in the gulf and is withdrawing some regulations that the EPA was planning to dump on our economy, but only under political pressure; the administration has decided not to have a public trial for KSM after political pressure; and Obama has decided that sanctions may be necessary against Syria and its killing of its own citizens (remember how Hillary recently claimed that Bashar Al-Assad was a reformer?). Although these things seem to indicate that Obama may be behaving more sensibly, they never would have happened if an election were not on the horizon and if he weren't hurting in the polls.
To even arrive at the numerous radical positions of the Obama administration indicates a lack of intelligence and common sense, and then to change positions under pressure shows that politics and power is all he cares about. Imagine how destructive the Obama administration would be if an election were not to be held soon, then imagine what Obama would do if he were re-elected for 4 more years. The damage a radical like him could do is nearly total.
But the true nature of Obama was recently seen when he stated that Israel should reduce its size and retreat to former "lines", allowing Palestinians to take land from Israel. The land that Obama wants Israel to forfeit was gained following attacks on Israel by Arab forces, and Israel has every right to hold these lands and increase its own security as a result.
There is no way that a strong Obama would ever retreat from his radical, ultra-leftist positions on the economy and his opposition to Israel, and our child president must be opposed at all times and on all fronts.
Monday, May 2, 2011
Osama Is Dead. Good Riddance, But....
The death of Osama Bin Laden is a happy moment and we can thank our brave Navy SEALS and our intelligence agencies for this event given the many deaths the evil Osama has caused.
But.....
When you consider who has caused the greatest lingering harm to America, the greatest loss of freedom to us and our children, the greatest loss of prosperity, the greatest harm to our economy, the greatest harm to our children's futures, the greatest damage to our legislative process, the greatest loss of jobs to our citizens, the greatest threat to our industry and our healthcare, the possibly unrecoverable debt our nation has been subjected to, Osama was a complete rube and a beginner.
Barack Obama has done more harm and damage to our nation than Osama Bin Laden could even wish to cause. Our greatest threats remain internal (Obama) not external. But here comes our brave Barry, strutting bravely to the microphone like a banty rooster to tell us how "he" gave permission for this event, how "he" made the decision to attack, what a good job "he" did as commander in chief, when everything good that happened was the result of groundwork laid by George Bush years ago and objected to by Obama and his liberal cheerleaders every inch of the way. Obama promised to close GITMO, to halt water-boarding, to stop the anti-terrorist wars, to halt the imagined abuses of the Patriot Act, all of which aided in getting to this happy moment in the fight against terror, and were given to Obama by George Bush and the excellent and dangerous work of our military. Obama's macho strutting and pride in the killing of Osama proves there is no honor among thieves, especially when one of them wants to be re-elected president.
And isn't it convenient that all of this happens just as Obama has seen his ratings for re-election drop into the danger zone? This event is all about how brave Obama is and what a great president he has become, not about punishing the enemies of America.
I thank Obama only for doing this one thing right during his term as president, but everything else he's done has been designed to destroy America, and if this fool man is re-elected to office for another 4 years this great nation will resemble the World Trade Center towers with smoke and dust pouring from them, exactly as Osama left them.
But.....
When you consider who has caused the greatest lingering harm to America, the greatest loss of freedom to us and our children, the greatest loss of prosperity, the greatest harm to our economy, the greatest harm to our children's futures, the greatest damage to our legislative process, the greatest loss of jobs to our citizens, the greatest threat to our industry and our healthcare, the possibly unrecoverable debt our nation has been subjected to, Osama was a complete rube and a beginner.
Barack Obama has done more harm and damage to our nation than Osama Bin Laden could even wish to cause. Our greatest threats remain internal (Obama) not external. But here comes our brave Barry, strutting bravely to the microphone like a banty rooster to tell us how "he" gave permission for this event, how "he" made the decision to attack, what a good job "he" did as commander in chief, when everything good that happened was the result of groundwork laid by George Bush years ago and objected to by Obama and his liberal cheerleaders every inch of the way. Obama promised to close GITMO, to halt water-boarding, to stop the anti-terrorist wars, to halt the imagined abuses of the Patriot Act, all of which aided in getting to this happy moment in the fight against terror, and were given to Obama by George Bush and the excellent and dangerous work of our military. Obama's macho strutting and pride in the killing of Osama proves there is no honor among thieves, especially when one of them wants to be re-elected president.
And isn't it convenient that all of this happens just as Obama has seen his ratings for re-election drop into the danger zone? This event is all about how brave Obama is and what a great president he has become, not about punishing the enemies of America.
I thank Obama only for doing this one thing right during his term as president, but everything else he's done has been designed to destroy America, and if this fool man is re-elected to office for another 4 years this great nation will resemble the World Trade Center towers with smoke and dust pouring from them, exactly as Osama left them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)