One may recall the Obama statement, during his stagnant eight years of idly occupying the Oval Office, that the “new economy” which followed the downturn in 2008, will never replace the growth years of Reagan and Clinton and can’t possibly grow at a rate greater than one to two percent a year. Well the widely declaimed and insulted Donald Trump proved the fool Obama wrong.
And now our savior Obama has arisen again to assure us that President Trump is only taking credit for his, Obama’s, great economy, which The One said could never grow again and would languish forever at low- to no-growth, because manufacturing jobs will never come back since there’s no demand for them in these post-industrial years.
But the truth is that either Obama didn’t want economic growth, but preferred a growing dependence on hand-outs and welfare from big government, or he simply was too lazy and too liberal-left dumb to know what to do to create economic growth. Probably Obama was both lazy and dumb.
But Donald Trump had both the energy to spur the economy and the knowledge of what to do to reverse the suffering of the American people and get the economy running again. After he reversed Obama’s job-killing regulations, and got rid of the Paris accords, and began defeating ISIS, and lowered taxes, and spoke well of industry and its importance to the economic welfare of all Americans, and began to re-negotiate trade deals with each major trading partner we have in the world, things that the lug-headed Obama would never have done even if he understood their value to Americans, we had a miraculous increase in employment statistics that Obama is now taking credit for.
Obama is back on the campaign trail again attempting a comeback to stardom as the only Democrat left standing since Trump became president, and is using cheap theater to appear attractive and enthusiastic. During a speech one might notice Obama’s alternation between a bobble-head and a freeze-frame style of delivery, while employing a cynical smirk as a facial feature. This phony attempt at gaining support for a range of old-style, Democrat, big-government, unconstitutional, anti-police, job-killing policies will never hold up against the straight-forward, humorous, truthful speeches in front of thousands of enthusiastic admirers that President Trump has been delivering the last few weeks.
Old bobble-head Obama is powerless without his “phone and pen”, which method of leading was a bad idea when he was in office, and is the reason his failing policies were so easily reversed by our real president, Donald Trump.
Monday, September 10, 2018
Sunday, September 9, 2018
Leftist Authoritarians And Their “Periods”
Leftists are used to getting weekly scripts of words and phrases that are approved by their radical, lying press/political leaders, for use the next seven days; that’s why at one point all liberals used the identical comment indicating that President George Bush had very little “gravitas”. When was the last time you heard the word “gravitas” used in any context, especially related to a president of the United States?
Another word that, when used by leftists, should be a measure of their dishonesty and lack of trustworthiness, is the word “period”. One will fondly recall the savior Barack Obama repeating upward of 30 times the following phrases while trying to sell Obamacare to America:
“You can keep your doctor, period. You can keep your plan, period. You will save $2500 a year, period.”
Since we all know that the sainted Obama was a bald-faced liar with each reference to his unconstitutional Obamacare, so liberals should be more careful when using the emphatic “period” in any context. But liberals are so wrapped up in their own importance and with their intended “fundamental transformation of America” that they are unable to think outside their radical message, so they make the repeat mistake of using Obama’s favorite word, as did Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey last week in a congressional hearing when he said that his company does not engage in shadow banning of conservatives, “period”.
As far as I’m concerned the liberal CEO of Twitter just told the truth about his company, and since we know the code to deciphering leftist truths, we know exactly what he said, and we know that he meant it.
Another word that, when used by leftists, should be a measure of their dishonesty and lack of trustworthiness, is the word “period”. One will fondly recall the savior Barack Obama repeating upward of 30 times the following phrases while trying to sell Obamacare to America:
“You can keep your doctor, period. You can keep your plan, period. You will save $2500 a year, period.”
Since we all know that the sainted Obama was a bald-faced liar with each reference to his unconstitutional Obamacare, so liberals should be more careful when using the emphatic “period” in any context. But liberals are so wrapped up in their own importance and with their intended “fundamental transformation of America” that they are unable to think outside their radical message, so they make the repeat mistake of using Obama’s favorite word, as did Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey last week in a congressional hearing when he said that his company does not engage in shadow banning of conservatives, “period”.
As far as I’m concerned the liberal CEO of Twitter just told the truth about his company, and since we know the code to deciphering leftist truths, we know exactly what he said, and we know that he meant it.
Who Is The Anonymous NYT Author? Perhaps The NYT?
Maybe I missed it along the fake news line of lies somewhere, but in all of the speculation about who, allegedly on the White House staff, wrote the anonymous Trump attack piece published in the New York Times OP-ED section last week, I would bet it’s just another in a long line of leftist lies aimed at hurting President Trump and his re-establishment of liberty and prosperity in America following his miraculous election victory over Hillary’s forces of darkness.
If the source is determined to be a person on the Trump staff and not a piece of fiction from NYT liberals, then at least it demonstrates that Trump was willing to give a person not fully on his side a chance to work in the administration, something you would never see from an Obama or a Clinton administration. All liberal rulers insist on complete subservience to their divisive, destructive policies, or you-know-what will happen to them. To that end there are stacks of liberals sitting around waiting for a government job and the chance to “Fundamentally Transform America” who are willing to subvert a conservative administration or dutifully serve a Democrat president, whereas Republicans are too busy working in the private sphere of business, seeking real accomplishment in private industry, and consider it to be a waste of time to seek or accept government work. This means there are few conservative people available for Trump to call on to serve on his staff, so he had to take a second choice for some position, and this less-than conservative choice decided that his/her leftist ideas should prevail over the ideas of a duly elected Trump, and this person deceived and lied to his/her employer, the president of the United States. If it should be determined that this anonymous author had access to classified information while serving the president, he/she must be tried and imprisoned for their crime.
Given that the NYT OP-ED article admitted that most of what President Trump has done is good and is beneficial to Americans, exactly what was it that the author of the article thought was so bad about Trump policies, and what exactly were the bad things that he/she was able to stop?
Given the outrageous statements of liberals and leftist politicians lately, with their total opposition to anything President Trump wants to do, it seems certain that the OP-ED author surely tried to ban ICE from enforcing duly passed immigration laws; to halt the recently passed tax relief bill; to fully re-establish the unconstitutional Obamacare; to back away from denuclearization talks with North Korea; to allow Iran to continue to develop a nuke and a delivery missile; to enact more job-killing regulations on businesses in America; to prevent the building of a wall along our southern border. All of these things are counter to Trump policies, so the author must have thought that blocking each of Trump’s initiatives would be a good idea.
So where are the specifics of the great anti-Trump things the author was able to do that he/she thinks is so great? Anyone who has the ability to think independently and logically knows that everything President Trump has proposed since becoming President is a GOOD thing and is in keeping with his campaign promises, so anything the author proposed that was contrary to what the president wants, must be bad. This also makes the author bad, so the more we learn about this individual, the better.
In 2018 and 2020 the American people will get the chance to state clearly whose side they’re on, Trump’s or the subversive OP-ED writer, and I’ll bet that the ideas and policies of Donald Trump win in both elections.
If the source is determined to be a person on the Trump staff and not a piece of fiction from NYT liberals, then at least it demonstrates that Trump was willing to give a person not fully on his side a chance to work in the administration, something you would never see from an Obama or a Clinton administration. All liberal rulers insist on complete subservience to their divisive, destructive policies, or you-know-what will happen to them. To that end there are stacks of liberals sitting around waiting for a government job and the chance to “Fundamentally Transform America” who are willing to subvert a conservative administration or dutifully serve a Democrat president, whereas Republicans are too busy working in the private sphere of business, seeking real accomplishment in private industry, and consider it to be a waste of time to seek or accept government work. This means there are few conservative people available for Trump to call on to serve on his staff, so he had to take a second choice for some position, and this less-than conservative choice decided that his/her leftist ideas should prevail over the ideas of a duly elected Trump, and this person deceived and lied to his/her employer, the president of the United States. If it should be determined that this anonymous author had access to classified information while serving the president, he/she must be tried and imprisoned for their crime.
Given that the NYT OP-ED article admitted that most of what President Trump has done is good and is beneficial to Americans, exactly what was it that the author of the article thought was so bad about Trump policies, and what exactly were the bad things that he/she was able to stop?
Given the outrageous statements of liberals and leftist politicians lately, with their total opposition to anything President Trump wants to do, it seems certain that the OP-ED author surely tried to ban ICE from enforcing duly passed immigration laws; to halt the recently passed tax relief bill; to fully re-establish the unconstitutional Obamacare; to back away from denuclearization talks with North Korea; to allow Iran to continue to develop a nuke and a delivery missile; to enact more job-killing regulations on businesses in America; to prevent the building of a wall along our southern border. All of these things are counter to Trump policies, so the author must have thought that blocking each of Trump’s initiatives would be a good idea.
So where are the specifics of the great anti-Trump things the author was able to do that he/she thinks is so great? Anyone who has the ability to think independently and logically knows that everything President Trump has proposed since becoming President is a GOOD thing and is in keeping with his campaign promises, so anything the author proposed that was contrary to what the president wants, must be bad. This also makes the author bad, so the more we learn about this individual, the better.
In 2018 and 2020 the American people will get the chance to state clearly whose side they’re on, Trump’s or the subversive OP-ED writer, and I’ll bet that the ideas and policies of Donald Trump win in both elections.
Saturday, September 8, 2018
Liberals Mistake The Truth For Abuse
It always angers me when I hear anyone state that we have to halt the abusive, divisive political attacks on BOTH sides. Both sides? Excuse me but the only thing Republicans or Donald Trump did that was divisive was to win a series of elections, and Democrats consider that to be abusive.
On the other hand:
* It was Hillary’s campaign that hired union thugs to beat Trump supporters in the 2016 campaign.
* It was the Hillary campaign that paid for the Dossier that originated the Trump/Russia lie. And it was Hillary that reported the money spent on the Dossier illegally to the FEC.
* It was the FBI that took the fake Dossier to the FISA court and improperly got permission to spy on a fellow American.
* It was the FBI officials who swore to keep Donald Trump out of the White House and launched an investigation into the lie of collusion to assure Trump’s defeat or impeachment.
Donald Trump has been heavily and deeply investigated by the special counsel and the only violations of the law that the investigators have found is the illegal activities of Hillary, the FBI and the DOJ, and no one in Mueller’s crew is even suggesting the prosecution of these deep state criminals.
The only abused entity here is Donald Trump, and it’s incredible how many news writers and news sources, reporting breath-taking revelations about Trump and how evil he is, are anonymous and are too cowardly to stand up and be counted.
From the Dossier, to the FBI warrant, to the New York Times “Trump insider” article published Wednesday, the left lies with every breath they take and tries to undermine the duly elected Trump presidency, while all along Donald Trump keeps improving our lives, keeping the nation safe and filling our pocket books, and he does exactly what the American people elected him to do.
When President Trump exposes the true nasty nature of liberals in politics or in the news, they take this exposure as abuse and fire off more divisive lies bout Trump.
On the other hand:
* It was Hillary’s campaign that hired union thugs to beat Trump supporters in the 2016 campaign.
* It was the Hillary campaign that paid for the Dossier that originated the Trump/Russia lie. And it was Hillary that reported the money spent on the Dossier illegally to the FEC.
* It was the FBI that took the fake Dossier to the FISA court and improperly got permission to spy on a fellow American.
* It was the FBI officials who swore to keep Donald Trump out of the White House and launched an investigation into the lie of collusion to assure Trump’s defeat or impeachment.
Donald Trump has been heavily and deeply investigated by the special counsel and the only violations of the law that the investigators have found is the illegal activities of Hillary, the FBI and the DOJ, and no one in Mueller’s crew is even suggesting the prosecution of these deep state criminals.
The only abused entity here is Donald Trump, and it’s incredible how many news writers and news sources, reporting breath-taking revelations about Trump and how evil he is, are anonymous and are too cowardly to stand up and be counted.
From the Dossier, to the FBI warrant, to the New York Times “Trump insider” article published Wednesday, the left lies with every breath they take and tries to undermine the duly elected Trump presidency, while all along Donald Trump keeps improving our lives, keeping the nation safe and filling our pocket books, and he does exactly what the American people elected him to do.
When President Trump exposes the true nasty nature of liberals in politics or in the news, they take this exposure as abuse and fire off more divisive lies bout Trump.
Friday, September 7, 2018
Hail Spartacus! Spartacus Is A Fool!
Cory Booker, US Senator from New Jersey, claimed the status of self-appointed hero for releasing forbidden documents he thought would hurt the chances of Bret Kavanaugh being approved as a Justice to the Supreme Court, in the Senate hearings held on Thursday. So he released the documents and then challenged the leaders of the Senate to punish him for doing so, and proclaimed himself a Spartacus figure for being so principled, strong and brave.
Poor, dumb, heroic Cory later learned that the documents he claimed to have bravely released were actually already approved for release, were not forbidden at all, and the information in the documents was actually not injurious to Kavahaugh’s chances of approval at all, but instead reinforced the fact that the Supreme Court appointee was no kind of racist, as the leftist radicals randomly claim about every opponent to their idiot politics that can‘t legitimately be defeated on facts and policies.
Will the idiot Democrats ever mature to the point where they behave like civilized, principled, responsible servants of the people?
Hail the Fool Booker, and vote Republican!!
Poor, dumb, heroic Cory later learned that the documents he claimed to have bravely released were actually already approved for release, were not forbidden at all, and the information in the documents was actually not injurious to Kavahaugh’s chances of approval at all, but instead reinforced the fact that the Supreme Court appointee was no kind of racist, as the leftist radicals randomly claim about every opponent to their idiot politics that can‘t legitimately be defeated on facts and policies.
Will the idiot Democrats ever mature to the point where they behave like civilized, principled, responsible servants of the people?
Hail the Fool Booker, and vote Republican!!
Tuesday, September 4, 2018
Democrats Should Never Go Out In Polite Public
After watching the horrendous display on Tuesday, of Senate Democrats goading, insulting and trying to get a negative response from Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in the opening hearings in his confirmation proceedings, I fear the future of America with Democrats in it, especially if they are running it. Brett Kavanaugh is a fine man and does not deserve the nasty treatment that Democrats are imposing on him. Democrats repeatedly criticize President Trump for non-presidential actions, but Democrats are much worse than Trump because there is never any humor, and rarely any truth, in what they say, unlike Trump who is always on target with the points he makes, yet adds humor to the things he says.
Democrats insist on allowing America-hating illegal aliens, who far too often bring disease, ignorance, poverty and crime with them as they enter this nation, to do as they wish once here. From hiring union thugs to beat on Trump supporters during the latest presidential campaign; to the ANTIFA criminals who beat people just to beat something; to anti-free-speech leftist punks who burn and trash college campuses as their way of challenging conservative visitors to campus; to trans-sexual, self-identity advocates who insist that all Americans must embrace and accept their deviant way of life and their radical views, these fools destroy America’s traditions and its constitution.
If Democrats are not insulting and trying to imprison the duly elected President Donald Trump or someone on his staff, they’re praising unelected tyrants like the murderous Castro brothers of Cuba or the dictators of Iran to whom Barack Obama gave billions of dollars in cash to finance terrorist groups intent on murdering Americans.
Democrats are radical, violent, thoughtless, impolite, base people who should remain indoors so as not to embarrass themselves with their crude behavior, and hopefully their absence from public display will allow our nation to heal and become dignified again.
Democrats insist on allowing America-hating illegal aliens, who far too often bring disease, ignorance, poverty and crime with them as they enter this nation, to do as they wish once here. From hiring union thugs to beat on Trump supporters during the latest presidential campaign; to the ANTIFA criminals who beat people just to beat something; to anti-free-speech leftist punks who burn and trash college campuses as their way of challenging conservative visitors to campus; to trans-sexual, self-identity advocates who insist that all Americans must embrace and accept their deviant way of life and their radical views, these fools destroy America’s traditions and its constitution.
If Democrats are not insulting and trying to imprison the duly elected President Donald Trump or someone on his staff, they’re praising unelected tyrants like the murderous Castro brothers of Cuba or the dictators of Iran to whom Barack Obama gave billions of dollars in cash to finance terrorist groups intent on murdering Americans.
Democrats are radical, violent, thoughtless, impolite, base people who should remain indoors so as not to embarrass themselves with their crude behavior, and hopefully their absence from public display will allow our nation to heal and become dignified again.
Sunday, September 2, 2018
Republicans Go Low and Democrats Go High? I Don’t Think So.
One will recall the memorable words of Michelle Obama when she said that Republicans go low and Democrats respond by going high. So maybe we’d better determine what going “low” means.
In 2016 Americans elected Donald Trump to be President of the United States, and since that time Democrats have been rioting, burning, calling him a racist and a traitor, accosting his staff in restaurants, writing fake news stories about him and his policies, accusing ICE agents of behaving like thugs and launching ANTIFA storm troops at peaceful Republican assemblies. You can’t get much lower than that.
I would say that the free, duly held election could be considered going high and that the violence and the leftist lying coming from the liberals could be considered going low. So what does this say about Democrats?
In 2016 Americans elected Donald Trump to be President of the United States, and since that time Democrats have been rioting, burning, calling him a racist and a traitor, accosting his staff in restaurants, writing fake news stories about him and his policies, accusing ICE agents of behaving like thugs and launching ANTIFA storm troops at peaceful Republican assemblies. You can’t get much lower than that.
I would say that the free, duly held election could be considered going high and that the violence and the leftist lying coming from the liberals could be considered going low. So what does this say about Democrats?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)