By this time we've become used to our idiot, grinning-from-ear-to-ear, Alfred E. Newman-like president, glad-handing everyone he sees, promising to "not rest" until jobs are plentiful, while simultaneously taking credit for the Bush-era oil drilling rigs and blaming Bush for the escalating cost of gasoline, or healthcare, or housing or whatever else Obama has made worse in the last 3 years.
But ole smiley will be sure to have elaborate, expensive parties in the White House, set new records for golfing while the nation sinks in debt and joblessness, and grinning for the camera in Martha's Vineyard and Hawaii, while wasting billions of dollars on his pet, non-productive alternative energy start-ups, which have all failed at taxpayer expense. And he does all this while Americans are dying in Afghanistan because someone burned some papers, and he's allowing Iran to continue to build a nuclear weapon which they've promised to detonate on Israel.
Anyone of a certain age will recall the liberal press of the 1970s posting a photograph of a smiling Richard Nixon along with the question: "Why is this man smiling?". Today I'd like conservatives and other Republicans to ask: "Why is Obama smiling?". This grinning fool has accomplished the financial ruin of this great nation and has completed his promised restructuring of America along lines of leftist "fairness", and this destruction is certainly what he's smiling about. In November we must send him and his grinning ears back to Chicago.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
The Double Standards Of Liberal "Faith"
Why is it that when conservatives/Republicans speak of matters of faith and religion they are criticized by the press and liberal politicians, and are described as imposing their religion on the nation, but when Bill Clinton (remember his "healing" prayer sessions with Jesse Jackson after the Lewinski affair became known?) or Barack Obama (he speaks of his "Christian Faith" while trying to force the Catholic Church to abandon it's long-standing beliefs and doctrine, and after sitting for 20 years in the church of Reverend Wright and listening to the hate that this man spewed from his pulpit all that time) talk about religion, the press is silent and doesn't consider their words to be at all a breach of the church and state divide. Why does this double standard exist?
It exists because the press and liberal politicians know that Clinton and Obama are lying through their teeth about their "faith", and the press admires how they can use the words of conservatives to defeat those same opponents. On the other hand liberals know that conservatives really mean and live by the words of faith they express, and the press scorns them for this middle class naivete.
So liberals improve their standing by lying and conservatives are ridiculed for stating the truth, and both sides are using very similar words, only with different meanings and audiences. There's really nothing new in any of this. Conservatives (like Rick Santorum) need to continue to speak the truth without making a sermon out of it, and a majority of voters will reward them for it in the end.
The Obamas of the world are pure evil, and they must be voted out of office before they completely destroy this great nation, regardless of the enlightened words they use to try to convince us of their so-called "Christian Faith".
It exists because the press and liberal politicians know that Clinton and Obama are lying through their teeth about their "faith", and the press admires how they can use the words of conservatives to defeat those same opponents. On the other hand liberals know that conservatives really mean and live by the words of faith they express, and the press scorns them for this middle class naivete.
So liberals improve their standing by lying and conservatives are ridiculed for stating the truth, and both sides are using very similar words, only with different meanings and audiences. There's really nothing new in any of this. Conservatives (like Rick Santorum) need to continue to speak the truth without making a sermon out of it, and a majority of voters will reward them for it in the end.
The Obamas of the world are pure evil, and they must be voted out of office before they completely destroy this great nation, regardless of the enlightened words they use to try to convince us of their so-called "Christian Faith".
Friday, February 10, 2012
Obama "Occupies" The Oval Office,The Unions "Occupy" GM
Given the unflinching gall of the Obama administration and their communistic insistence of basing everything from personal wealth to wages on a doctrine of "fairness", instead of the work and thrift it takes to accumulate wealth, what's to stop these leftists witf their occupying of wall street, and any other street, park or city they want to occupy, from turning their "occupy" movement into a real occupation (traditionally meaning one's chosen line of work or profession, but taking on a new and unconstitutional meaning with these fools being encouraged by Obama) and simply occupy people's large homes, or hotels and motels having unused or spare bedrooms and bathrooms in fairness to. and the use of, those who will not work for a living and will not provide for themselves. Using the ill-logic these leftist nuts have been using since the protests in the 60s, they could just take over and occupy anything they want and no one could stop them. After all, Obama did the same unconstitutional thing when he by-passed bankruptcy laws, gave General Motors to the unions and denied bond holders their legal rights to compensation as the company went under. Obama and the union rabble simply "occupied" GM, so they have tradition on their side. And there's international tradition as well, because the communists in Russia occupied the homes of wealthy Russians after their revolution in 1917, so Obama and his occupiers are in good company, because, after all, that experiment turned out so well for the citizens of Russia.
If our nation doesn't dump Obama this year and return to abiding by the Constitution and the rule of law, America will wither and die and our children and grandchildren will have much meaner and crueler lives than any of us have experienced.
If our nation doesn't dump Obama this year and return to abiding by the Constitution and the rule of law, America will wither and die and our children and grandchildren will have much meaner and crueler lives than any of us have experienced.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Obama Just Keeps On Spending
I understand that the Obama administration has, or will soon, appoint a governmental advocate for illegal aliens. Who's the idiot that thought of this fool's proposal?
Setting aside that we should be deporting illegal aliens, not advocating on their behalf, I thought Obama agreed with Republicans that we need to cut expenditures and spend less money, not create more high paying jobs and spend more money on this new salary. We can't afford to hire more people and make government bigger. We should be laying government employees off and sending them home, not adding to the payroll.
If congress doesn't deny the funding for this new position they are a pack of fools. What we need to do immediately is repeal the enabling legislation for the Departments of Education, Energy and Interior, and fire the EPA in one fell swoop for declaring war on the American economy with it's never-ending regulations and controls, not hiring more liberal fools who are plotting our national demise.
Setting aside that we should be deporting illegal aliens, not advocating on their behalf, I thought Obama agreed with Republicans that we need to cut expenditures and spend less money, not create more high paying jobs and spend more money on this new salary. We can't afford to hire more people and make government bigger. We should be laying government employees off and sending them home, not adding to the payroll.
If congress doesn't deny the funding for this new position they are a pack of fools. What we need to do immediately is repeal the enabling legislation for the Departments of Education, Energy and Interior, and fire the EPA in one fell swoop for declaring war on the American economy with it's never-ending regulations and controls, not hiring more liberal fools who are plotting our national demise.
Monday, January 30, 2012
The Liberals' $2 Billion School District Decertification Plan
Rush Limbaugh is fond of saying that when you investigate the most failed cities, and in this case our attention is on a failed school district, you'll discover that liberal Democrats are in charge of the failed entity. But in the case of the Kansas City school district, liberals made the citizens pay out $2,000,000,000 to finally achieve only the decertification of the district.
Liberals always want attention directed to their motives, not the outcome of their policies, so we must be reminded that liberals destroyed the Kansas City school district in an attempt to eliminate segregation, and when all is said and done, they destroyed the education of all of the students in the district, even the minority (actually they are the majority) students they intended to protect. Liberals always think they can throw money at a problem and it will fix itself, and they are always wrong. And in this case their error will impact many students for years to come. they should go away in shame for what they've done, but instead they look for someone else to "help".
So we have the desire to help under-privileged children that ends up hurting them and undermining their futures, and costing everyone an enormous fortune in the bargain. Total waste, government control and stupidity. And these are the same fools who now occupy the Obama administration and are in control of our nation's defense (cutting the military budget at a dangerous time in the world), our economy (the EPA is shutting down electric generating plants when we need them most, and Obama is denying America a new source of energy from Canada), healthcare (Obamacare has only just begun and already is costing us money and medical attention), and our children's education (need I say more about liberals and education?).
Will we get rid of the liberal scourge in November 2012, or will we allow Obama to finally end the prosperity and liberty this nation has enjoyed for over 200 years?
Liberals always want attention directed to their motives, not the outcome of their policies, so we must be reminded that liberals destroyed the Kansas City school district in an attempt to eliminate segregation, and when all is said and done, they destroyed the education of all of the students in the district, even the minority (actually they are the majority) students they intended to protect. Liberals always think they can throw money at a problem and it will fix itself, and they are always wrong. And in this case their error will impact many students for years to come. they should go away in shame for what they've done, but instead they look for someone else to "help".
So we have the desire to help under-privileged children that ends up hurting them and undermining their futures, and costing everyone an enormous fortune in the bargain. Total waste, government control and stupidity. And these are the same fools who now occupy the Obama administration and are in control of our nation's defense (cutting the military budget at a dangerous time in the world), our economy (the EPA is shutting down electric generating plants when we need them most, and Obama is denying America a new source of energy from Canada), healthcare (Obamacare has only just begun and already is costing us money and medical attention), and our children's education (need I say more about liberals and education?).
Will we get rid of the liberal scourge in November 2012, or will we allow Obama to finally end the prosperity and liberty this nation has enjoyed for over 200 years?
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Democrats-The New Prohibition Party
The new prohibitionists love to just-say-no:
No, you can't keep your healthcare.
No, you can't practice your religion as you see fit.
No, your coal-powered electric plant can't continue to operate.
No, you can't buy incandescent light bulbs.
No, you can't buy the toilet of your choice.
No, you can't build on your own property.
No, you can't import oil from Canada.
No, you can't keep more of your own money.
No, your government will not abide by the Constitution.
Increasingly, Democrats, and our "just-say-no" president, are choking our nation's economy and ending our Constitutional liberties by denying us everything our free population has always enjoyed, and withholding the freedoms we used to take for granted.
But of course, being the counter-culture that they are, Democrats occasionally say "yes":
Yes, we can legalize marijuana.
Yes, we can abort a fetus at-will.
Yes, we can defecate in public and block traffic in any city we wish to "occupy".
We must not relax our opposition to the party of the left, and we must continue to push for the defeat of Barack Obama in November.
No, you can't keep your healthcare.
No, you can't practice your religion as you see fit.
No, your coal-powered electric plant can't continue to operate.
No, you can't buy incandescent light bulbs.
No, you can't buy the toilet of your choice.
No, you can't build on your own property.
No, you can't import oil from Canada.
No, you can't keep more of your own money.
No, your government will not abide by the Constitution.
Increasingly, Democrats, and our "just-say-no" president, are choking our nation's economy and ending our Constitutional liberties by denying us everything our free population has always enjoyed, and withholding the freedoms we used to take for granted.
But of course, being the counter-culture that they are, Democrats occasionally say "yes":
Yes, we can legalize marijuana.
Yes, we can abort a fetus at-will.
Yes, we can defecate in public and block traffic in any city we wish to "occupy".
We must not relax our opposition to the party of the left, and we must continue to push for the defeat of Barack Obama in November.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Liberal Policy Is Driven By Illogic
At a time when Obama is trying to push the Chevy Volt on the nation as a gas and carbon saver, the EPA is publishing regulations that will cause many power plants to shut down, thereby depriving the Volt of its charging current. At exactly the time we need gasoline-powered cars the most so as to have transportation during the certain brown-outs to follow on the heels of the EPA's dictates, Obama wants us to get off gasoline and onto the dying power grid. And even in those locations where there will be plenty of electric power left after the EPA edicts begin shutting down plants, the electric generating plants largely use fossil fuels to deliver the power that charges the Volt, so where is the gain?
This situation is similar to the new low water use toilets; the new toilets use less water per flush, so in order to do the same job, more flushes have to be made, so where is the water savings? Add to this illogic the fact that water is not in short supply and that the water you buy is your personal property, and you might well ask what business the government has telling you how much of your personal property you can use at any one time. The same offensive edicts are made with the new curly light bulbs: the electricity and the bulbs are your personal property, so how dare the government tell you how you should use it and the type bulbs you should buy.
Recently the Chevy Volt was reported as having a tendency for causing fires, so General Motors recalled all of the new cars to inspect them, but quickly ended the recall at the government's acquiesance stating that the Volt was no more likely to cause trouble than a gasoline-powered automobile. But that wasn't the point of the recall, which was to determine why cars sold by GM were bursting into flames and burning down owners' homes. The government was protecting GM because it's now owned and operated by the unions. Remember when the Toyota was accused of unplanned acceleration a few years ago and causing accidents? The government made a big deal of this in an effort to hurt non-union Toyota and sell more Chevys, but the Toyota scare was a lie.
I'd still like to know why the Volt suddenly bursts into flames and burns down homes, but Obama wants to cover this up and make it go away.
The Keystone XL pipeline investors seek to create a new source of energy and to create new jobs and employ people currently out of work. The aspect of the project involving jobs would seem to be one that Obama would favor because he has said numerous times that he "will not rest" until there are jobs for everyone. Of course he didn't say he wouldn't play golf or vacation in Hawaii until there are sufficient jobs, but he must be tired when he golfs and plays on the beach because he's still denying Americans jobs. And consider his loud voice when he proclaimed that we must stop our dependence on foreign, unfriendly oil, and then balance that statement with denying energy from a friendly source: Canada. But the Obama administration, when faced with the decision to allow people to live freely, is the party of NO! Investors cannot provide the energy we need, nor will you be allowed to provide employment, because not "enough" jobs will be created (the government decides when there are sufficient jobs being created, and whether they are sufficiently well paying). However the Obama administration will freely give money to Solyndra and Fisker (the Finland-assembled electric auto maker) even though their products are not wanted by prospective customers, they can't afford to do the things they state are their goals, and they're broke!
The EPA passes regulations limiting mercury everywhere in homes and businesses alike in order to prevent poisoning, especially in children (the liberals in government love to express their protection of children, except when the children are in the womb, or when they are trying to get a good education, at which time they are forced into failed government schools). But government bans the use of incandescent bulbs and force us to buy the mercury-laden curly fluorescent bulbs that will be in all homes and near all children in the event they're broken.
This situation is similar to the new low water use toilets; the new toilets use less water per flush, so in order to do the same job, more flushes have to be made, so where is the water savings? Add to this illogic the fact that water is not in short supply and that the water you buy is your personal property, and you might well ask what business the government has telling you how much of your personal property you can use at any one time. The same offensive edicts are made with the new curly light bulbs: the electricity and the bulbs are your personal property, so how dare the government tell you how you should use it and the type bulbs you should buy.
Recently the Chevy Volt was reported as having a tendency for causing fires, so General Motors recalled all of the new cars to inspect them, but quickly ended the recall at the government's acquiesance stating that the Volt was no more likely to cause trouble than a gasoline-powered automobile. But that wasn't the point of the recall, which was to determine why cars sold by GM were bursting into flames and burning down owners' homes. The government was protecting GM because it's now owned and operated by the unions. Remember when the Toyota was accused of unplanned acceleration a few years ago and causing accidents? The government made a big deal of this in an effort to hurt non-union Toyota and sell more Chevys, but the Toyota scare was a lie.
I'd still like to know why the Volt suddenly bursts into flames and burns down homes, but Obama wants to cover this up and make it go away.
The Keystone XL pipeline investors seek to create a new source of energy and to create new jobs and employ people currently out of work. The aspect of the project involving jobs would seem to be one that Obama would favor because he has said numerous times that he "will not rest" until there are jobs for everyone. Of course he didn't say he wouldn't play golf or vacation in Hawaii until there are sufficient jobs, but he must be tired when he golfs and plays on the beach because he's still denying Americans jobs. And consider his loud voice when he proclaimed that we must stop our dependence on foreign, unfriendly oil, and then balance that statement with denying energy from a friendly source: Canada. But the Obama administration, when faced with the decision to allow people to live freely, is the party of NO! Investors cannot provide the energy we need, nor will you be allowed to provide employment, because not "enough" jobs will be created (the government decides when there are sufficient jobs being created, and whether they are sufficiently well paying). However the Obama administration will freely give money to Solyndra and Fisker (the Finland-assembled electric auto maker) even though their products are not wanted by prospective customers, they can't afford to do the things they state are their goals, and they're broke!
The EPA passes regulations limiting mercury everywhere in homes and businesses alike in order to prevent poisoning, especially in children (the liberals in government love to express their protection of children, except when the children are in the womb, or when they are trying to get a good education, at which time they are forced into failed government schools). But government bans the use of incandescent bulbs and force us to buy the mercury-laden curly fluorescent bulbs that will be in all homes and near all children in the event they're broken.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)