President Trump Is The Divisive One? I Don’t Think So.

So the owner of the New England Patriots football team thinks Donald Trump was divisive for his scornful words related to the NFL players “taking a knee’ during the playing of the National Anthem?  I see that issue rather differently.

When President Trump stated that multimillionaire football players were disrespecting our flag and the National Anthem by “taking a knee” he was simply expressing the attitude of most Americans and was not being disruptive at all; he was just responding to the disruption caused by the NFL players as they took up the leftist cause of America being rotten and the nation needing “fundamental” change, as was Obama‘s opinion. If you want to see what divisive looks like just consider the outrage and uproar that resulted from these acts of Barack Obama:

Barack Obama was divisive when he invited the Black Lives Matter group to the White House while they were celebrating the assassination of police officers nationally.

Barack Obama was divisive when he opened our borders to all who would illegally enter in contradiction to the laws passed by congress.

Barack Obama was divisive when he defended the leftist sanctuary city bad idea and allowed not only illegals but criminal illegals to live in the United States with full immunity from the laws of our nation.

Barack Obama was divisive when he promised to “fundamentally transform America” as soon as he was elected to the Oval Office, and then set about doing it.

Barack Obama was divisive when he ignored the obvious breaking of federal tax law by  the IRS when they discriminated against Republicans prior to the 2012 election.

Barack Obama was divisive when he identified the Ferguson police force as being racist and nationalized it under his Department of Justice.

Barack Obama was divisive when he declared that Hillary Clinton had committed no crime as Secretary of State when she used her own personal email server to send and receive classified messages.

Barack Obama was divisive when he took up the banner of allowing men, who could at the drop of a hat self-identify as women, and freely enter women’s restrooms across the nation.

Barack Obama was divisive when he stated that the American constitution was a “negative” document instead of its being the revolutionary and liberating document that America’s founders put in place to protect average citizens from an intrusive government, like the one Obama was putting in place.

Trump was just defending the interests and attitudes of his base, and no negative impact will stick to him for his bold, plain-spoken words. On the other hand, Barack Obama was certain that America was seriously flawed and needed large infusions of his radical medicine in order to get it thinking right again. Oddly enough, Obama’s opinion of America is the same opinion held by Adolf Hitler, Chairman Mao and Joseph Stalin, just to put his ideas in proper perspective.

Hillary Is a Professional Flip-Flopper

During the first Bill Clinton presidential campaign, Hillary swore to “stand by her man” and make him cookies, much like a typical housewife would do, and contrary to everything she believes in today.

During Bill Clinton’s re-election campaign Hillary headed up the Bimbo Eruption squad that attacked women who mentioned their relations with Bill. So these women who opposed the bad treatment that Bill meted out are, in Hillary’s opinion, bad women when they complain about Bill’s bad acts? Meanwhile feminists call all men predators and let Bill slide.

During her post-White House years Hillary proclaimed that women should be treated equally with men. As a test of just how serious feminists are with the women being equal to men thing, recently Joy Behar, of The View television show, criticized Mike Huckabee for allowing his daughter to work for Donald Trump’s administration, as though his daughter could not make up her own mind whom to work for, and as though Donald Trump is nearly the risk for a woman to work for that Bill Clinton is. Just ask Monica Lewinski.

During Hillary’s Senate and Secretary of State years, while she insisted that women should be paid equally with men, she consistently paid women on her staff less than her male employees.

During Hillary’s own presidential candidacy she ran as a female victim to be pitied for her mistreatment, and in her speeches she told every woman that they must vote for her or they would be letting all women down, indicating that voting for Hillary was an obligation owed her by all women. But would one be mistaken to believe that the president serves the entire nation and not only the female part of the nation? Does Hillary, given her self-absorption and her radical feminism, understand this aspect of the presidency?

During Hillary’s 2016 post-presidential run she claimed that American women allowed their husbands to instruct them to vote for Trump and not her. Does Hillary really believe that women are so stupid and weak that they can be told for whom to vote?

These examples of flip-flopping are a separate subject from the many lies Hillary has told publicly, such as flying into a war zone with Chelsea on board the aircraft and having to cork-screw down in order to avoid enemy fire while landing, and getting her first name as a sign of  her mother’s  respect for Sir Edmond Hillary after he scaled Mount Everest.

Hillary will use any misguided illogic to get votes and followers. One time she’ll be the dutiful wife, the next time she’ll be a con-woman trying to force all women to vote for her out of a misguided sense of duty to all other women, and then she’ll be abusive to her political base as she criticizes any woman as being a traitor if they didn’t cast a vote for her. It sounds like Hillary is against the principle of letting women make up their own minds about who is the best candidate to represent them for president. It reminds one of Hillary’s “deplorable” comments which lost her many votes in the last election.

It’s too bad Hillary is just unable to gain people’s votes, men’s and women’s alike, based on her being a good candidate and not a shrill, unpleasant liar every time she opens her mouth. But given her inability to will elections, I kind of like her just the way she is.

A Word Of Advice To The NFL Players

One hears rumors that the National Football League players are concerned about police violence and black males overloading the American prison system. Here’s how people really searching for a solution to these very real and very serious issues can resolve both problems:

1) Don’t commit crimes.
2) Obey all police instructions.

By following these simple guidelines you’d be surprised how little trouble one runs into with the police, and, therefore, citizens are able to stay out of prison. I know that the subject is more nuanced and complicated than stated above, but on the other hand, I didn’t see any players protest when Black Lives Matters assassins were killing police officers and the then-president was hosting the BLM group at the White House as a sign of his support for the things they were doing.  But simply from a consideration of self-preservation, have you never heard of killing the goose that lays the golden egg?

If you players don’t follow these simple guidelines and instead go ahead with your insistence on holding demonstrations during football games in November, which is just a boring repetition of your current kneeling in disrespect for America’s flag and our national anthem, then your disruptive practices will possibly destroy your own high-paying jobs with the NFL, and possibly destroy the NFL itself as the great entertainment and escape-vehicle it has become.

From here on out it’s up to you players. Consider carefully, because your multi-million dollar salaries are at stake.

Leftist Doubters And Dictator Apologists Are Proven Wrong Again

With the real-world threat North Korea is presenting to the world, with its launching  of missiles over Japan and threatening the island of Guam with a missile attack, one hopes that the political left will, in just this one case, admit that they were wrong in the 1980s as Ronald Reagan, with intense criticism from the leftist press, supported the development of what the leftist peaceniks called “Star Wars” weapons: missiles that could intercept and shoot down other missiles.

One must remember that in the 1980s the American left loved the Soviet Union and didn‘t want to develop a defensive missile of our own that could destroy a Russian missile aimed at New York City, because that would only anger the Russkies and make them feel bad. So our leftists claimed that one missile intercepting another missile in flight was impossible and only created more international friction with our peace-loving brothers in Russia.

But now these missiles and their technology have been proven to be effective, and in fact, with all of the missiles North Korea has been launching, their technology may be the savior of a target that the Norks may be aiming at: perhaps even the leftist nirvana of Los Angeles.

But one doesn’t expect the political left to thank conservatives for potentially saving their worthless hides by continuing with the development of the “provocative“ and life-saving intercept missiles.

Bad News For The Left: Homosexuality Is Non-Sustainable

One hears a lot these days, from our know-it-all younger generation, about how to maintain our current level of quality of life by reverting to sustainable sources of energy, like wind power, solar power, by getting rid of internal combustion engines, by foregoing air conditioning and forced-air home heating, all of which leftists claim will make our nation more sustainable by using less carbon power, but in actuality would only make America poorer and less safe in a very dangerous world.

But another area where our young smart-set hasn’t yet thought of applying the theory of sustainability is the area of human reproduction, and especially the area housing the assumed wisdom and empowerment of homosexuality. Young people are, I’m certain, aware that a male and a female participant are required (not three or fifty sexual preferences or identities as listed in government approved lists, but one male sperm and one female egg) to create one, or several in rare cases, new human being.

So it’s not possible for homosexuals to adequately sustain their own area of sexual interest with only males or only females participating in the effort. Gays have brought LGBTQ identifiers into the class of  allegedly discriminated-against people who at least share the liberal, political leanings that are related to warming/change and sustainability, yet they are unable to create even one additional person of their own sexual persuasion by  practicing only with someone of the same sex. So sustainability is impossible for these enlightened people.

In the meantime we heteros are carrying the load of creating new citizens for the LGBTQ/Gay slackers, from which population they will extract some of the homosexual  product.

One wisely questions the leftist rhetoric of “sustainability” in general, but in the case of reproduction and homosexuality, it’s an open and shut case of sustainability being a load of misguided, political offal.

Why Isn’t Hillary Clinton Testifying Before A Grand Jury Yet?

The former Director of the FBI spent much television time in 2016 enumerating to the entire nation the crimes that the FBI confirmed were committed by Hillary Clinton related to her illegal email system. The list of crimes were serious and some even place America in a dangerous position in our current world filled with terrorists. So why is she not being frog-walked to the witness stand for a Grand Jury appearance?

Why, indeed, is Hillary still walking free in the United States? Why are the American people forced to listen to this common criminal when she claims that she will take possession of the Oval Office when Donald Trump is shown to have been elected illegally?

Why are Samantha Power and Susan Rice not being investigated by a special prosecutor for their wire-tapping and unmasking activities?  And why was Lois Lerner allowed to walk free and get a federal retirement check after illegally discriminating against Republicans when they sought positive tax treatment for their political activities like the Democrats got without a question being asked? Congress and the Department of Justice are neglecting the crimes of the establishment swamp by not pursuing these criminals. I thought President Trump was going to clear this swamp out, but it looks like it won’t happen.

The FBI can invade Paul Manafort’s residence in the middle of the night and remove his personal documents, but the Democrats who served Obama’s crime machine are allowed to continue their lives unobstructed. Why?

Will The Next Monument To Be Destroyed Be The Pyramids?

With the radical American left quickly running out of racist, slave-owning monuments to deface, will they next look to the slave-state of ancient Egypt and try to tear down the great Pyramids?

It would be a logical next step if what they hate is really slave-owners, but in the case of Egypt, American liberals would likely claim that the relatively dark-skin color of Egyptians removes them from the judgment heaped on people with white skin color, so the dark-skinned Egyptians cannot be considered by the same standards white Americans are judged and labeled. Typical liberal-speak.

The truth of the matter is that the Pyramids were built with slave labor to be monuments celebrating the current or just-deceased former Pharaoh, so they were indeed slave owners, and slavery is color blind.

In fact, throughout history slavery was more common for a majority of people and nations throughout the world than freedom. All of the kingdoms in medieval times had serfs who were effectively slaves to the monarch. No one had the liberty to relocate from their assigned village and their assigned field which they were expected to  cultivate and pay taxes on. The legend of Robin Hood was of  someone who fought the dictates of the monarch , which the common people of England could not escape.

In the United States there were thousands of free blacks who owned slaves and profited from having them, and the American Indians enslaved enemy tribes that they conquered, including white settlers they picked up and enslaved along the way. When you consider the amount of slavery currently occurring in eastern Africa at this current time, and the suffering that results from it, it’s amazing how much emphasis American liberals place on the America of 150 years ago and how they assign blame to current citizens of the United States and for old Confederate monuments, for what happened in the distant past. But it’s a radical liberal thing, and no sensible person would understand.