Statement from the Candidate

In 2010 I ran an unsuccessful campaign for the United States Congress, but I'm still posting blogs that I believe express an opinion that most other people miss, and that I also believe can make America great again and cast off the yoke of liberal/progressive control that is currently in place.

Thursday, November 2, 2017

Trying To Understand The Liberal Hangup On “Diversity”

It’s too bad that liberals are so hung up on their driving force of “diversity” that they have forgotten about liberty and freedom and national identity. Diversity is not something one has to intentionally create or search for, it’s ever-present in everything we see and do. No two people are the same and no two ideas are the same, yet liberals are making the nation weary with their insistence on selecting certain “diverse” people to settle here, even when those people too often try to kill Americans once they get here.

One thing that liberals insist on which says nothing about the diversity of the person, is skin color. They pretend that a racial skin color achievement assures diversity, which is simply junk thought. There is more similarity between a black American male and a white American male than there is between a white American male and a white Lithuanian male. Skin color has nothing to do with any real diversity, except that in America liberal politicians have made very comfortable careers for themselves out of serving up this brand of racism. One symbol of real diversity would be for liberals to allow conservatives enter into their decision making process. Maybe hire a conservative commentator on CNN or MSNBC; this would be achieving diversity and would be a sign that liberal Democrats are sincere about real diversity. But they are not sincere, and they won’t do it.

The lie of politically engineered and driven “diversity” is that assuring a specific balance of race and gender in a population does not assure a safe, secure and prosperous nation. A random, blind sample of a population will assure a world of diversity among citizens who want to participate. After all, America was at its strongest and dominated the world following World War II, and that was long before we had a Civil Rights Act. So it would appear that looking at race and gender and allowing only a chosen few to participate based on these irrelevant criteria is a waste of time, and a waste of valuable talent.

For their pie-in-the-sky objective of achieving phony “diversity’, liberals have insisted for the last eight years on bringing massive numbers of Middle Eastern Muslims into America, only to find that much too often these objects and symbols of diversity are terrorists whose only objective is to kill Americans.

Liberal idiocy expands when you consider that the recent perpetrator of the terrorist killings in lower Manhattan was admitted to the United States under the liberal “diversity lottery” program. So we let this animal into our nation not knowing what his political leanings were nor knowing how he would act once he got here, but we achieved the liberal nirvana of “diversity” simply by his being here, and liberals went away pleased and proud of themselves for being such good people. But their good intentions led to the murder of many Americans and tourists who were simply trying to enjoy themselves one pleasant fall day in New York City. Despite tens of thousands of Middle Eastern refugees already in America, we had not yet achieved “diversity” and had to let one more Uzbekistani into the country, and this single symbol of liberal goodness killed Americans to show his gratitude.

The truth of the matter is that liberal Democrats need dependent, unassimilated welfare recipients that will vote for them and keep them in office, so they seek new dependent class individuals all the time and simply label them “diversity”. Shame on these damned fools for playing games with peoples’ lives