One hears a report that the Chinese Communists think America should learn from their example and ban guns in our society. If we really wanted lessons from China we’d begin running military tanks over young demonstrators (look up Tiananmen Square for a picture of how the Chinese treat young people they disagree with and want to silence) and outlawing news reports that we don’t want to be exposed to the world, but Chinese lies are not the issue here. Instead it’s the innocence, and dare I say it, the willful stupidity, of too many young Americans who believe the anti-American crap being spread about life in this nation.
In the current atmosphere of societal and governmental ignorance on the part of many high school and college students, and fearing that American youth will agree with the lying Communist Chinese, today’s youth should know that the Chinese Communists ban weapons from their population because they are absolute dictators and they fear an uprising from the Chinese population if people had the ability to defend themselves and oppose the rulers of the Chinese totalitarian rule.
Young people should also know that Communism is a form of government that controls the population of the nation practicing it, completely and absolutely, and it also dictates economic practices for the nation, whereas the United States has a less centralized federal form of government with a Constitution that assures our citizens, among numerous other things, the freedom of speech and the right of possession of self-defense weapons, and our Capitalist economic system assures that iPhones, central heating for our homes, freedom of travel and internet access can exist amidst general economic prosperity.
When a government controls a nation’s economy, the population living in that nation live unpleasant and often miserable lives. Even the few people living in the United Sates who earn little relative income, live comfortable lives, so one should be smart enough to let their eyes and intelligence be their guide as to where they’d rather live and which nation allows its citizens to live the best lives.
As one travels around the world one sees people in third world, impoverished countries who work for poverty wages and yet give abundant evidence that they are highly intelligent, bright people who, if they were living in the United States, would be employed in high paying jobs. But since they live in a backward, non-democratic, non-capitalist or often Socialist nation they are not employed at the level of their ability and therefore have limited income and no expectation of their situation improving.
Americans are freer than any other nation because we have a constitution that assures our people a free press, free speech, and the right to possess self-defense weapons, and our population is wealthier because our government allows capitalism to flourish to the benefit of everyone. Americans must be very careful that the liberal political leanings of the last 40-or-so years do not destroy the wealth and freedom we have had for over 200 years. Most of the world is poor and live unpleasant lives, and we’ll join that unfortunate majority if we don’t protect the rights assured by our constitution.
Sunday, February 25, 2018
Friday, February 23, 2018
Liberals Are Once Again Given A Pass
Now we know why Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein didn’t use sterner words in his announcement last Friday of Russian citizens being under indictment for influencing and trying to disrupt the 2016 election. Since President Trump is the assumed culprit for anything the Mueller investigation team discovers that Russia does, we expected serious finger-pointing at Trump and his team, but the charges as described by Rosenstein were muted.
The reason for his down-playing the Russian involvement in American elections is that CNN, MSNBC, the Democrat party, and even an individual American citizen in the form of Michael Moore, were identified as falling for the Russian schemes to upset our elections and sow displeasure among the American populace with future elections. It was disclosed that CNN and MSNBC happily announced on their cable programs where the anti-Trump demonstrations were to be held, and sent out reporters to let the world know how unified the demonstrators were and how they hated Donald Trump, and all of this was planned and coordinated by the Russian president, Vladimir Putin. In fact, any thinking, knowledgeable person who has paid attention to international affairs the last 70 or so years would not be surprised at Russian involvement in disrupting an American election. But Democrats, who have expressed only admiration for the Soviet Union and Russia and defended them vehemently in the 1980s as Ronald Reagan and other American conservatives made the case exposing Russia’s murderous, dictatorial methods of ruling the eastern block and explained why they should be opposed with all military and economic tools available at our disposal, loved the lie of Communism.
So with Washington establishment liberals in the media to blame for the disruptions and demonstrations that occasionally got violent, burned buildings and often got people hurt, our Mr. Rosen was crossing T’s and dotting I’s while covering for his liberal establishment pals, but he still would not give an inch on the accusation of Donald Trump as being the most evil man in America.
Of course there will never be a trial for the indicted Russians, but the fact that the Special Investigative team of Mueller and company, investigating Donald Trump, found Russian offenses against America, was all the FBI and the Attorney General wanted the public to hear: It’s all Trump’s fault.
But we still welcome liberals to the reality of the 20th and 21st centuries and the real nature of Russia. You can still defend this evil nation and its total ruler, Vladimir Putin, but at least you have been shown the truth.
The reason for his down-playing the Russian involvement in American elections is that CNN, MSNBC, the Democrat party, and even an individual American citizen in the form of Michael Moore, were identified as falling for the Russian schemes to upset our elections and sow displeasure among the American populace with future elections. It was disclosed that CNN and MSNBC happily announced on their cable programs where the anti-Trump demonstrations were to be held, and sent out reporters to let the world know how unified the demonstrators were and how they hated Donald Trump, and all of this was planned and coordinated by the Russian president, Vladimir Putin. In fact, any thinking, knowledgeable person who has paid attention to international affairs the last 70 or so years would not be surprised at Russian involvement in disrupting an American election. But Democrats, who have expressed only admiration for the Soviet Union and Russia and defended them vehemently in the 1980s as Ronald Reagan and other American conservatives made the case exposing Russia’s murderous, dictatorial methods of ruling the eastern block and explained why they should be opposed with all military and economic tools available at our disposal, loved the lie of Communism.
So with Washington establishment liberals in the media to blame for the disruptions and demonstrations that occasionally got violent, burned buildings and often got people hurt, our Mr. Rosen was crossing T’s and dotting I’s while covering for his liberal establishment pals, but he still would not give an inch on the accusation of Donald Trump as being the most evil man in America.
Of course there will never be a trial for the indicted Russians, but the fact that the Special Investigative team of Mueller and company, investigating Donald Trump, found Russian offenses against America, was all the FBI and the Attorney General wanted the public to hear: It’s all Trump’s fault.
But we still welcome liberals to the reality of the 20th and 21st centuries and the real nature of Russia. You can still defend this evil nation and its total ruler, Vladimir Putin, but at least you have been shown the truth.
Vladimir Putin Takes American Democrats To School
American Democrats and their community organizing subsidiaries have been using Stalinist, Alinsky tactics for years to divide American citizens and disrupt our political election process, but after 70 years of the Soviet Union also undermining and subverting our Democracy, Vladimir Putin has now demonstrated that no matter how hard liberal Democrats use Soviet/Russian tactics in and against America, the Rooskies are able to make our liberal Democrats look like the fools they are when the Russians use their tested and proven subversion tactics against the Democrat Party.
MSNBC and CNN actually did the bidding of Russia when they advertised and helped assemble crowds for Russian-planned, anti-Trump and anti-Clinton demonstrations, some of which even resulted in buildings being burned and people being beaten, so a thinking person has to conclude that Democrat, leftist Fake News organizations were actively colluding with Russia, and we all know how liberals pretend to hate people who collude with Russia, right?
One hates to speak in contradiction of the leftist hero, Comrade Barack Obama, but after witnessing events lately that conclusively prove how involved Russia has been in our national elections, I hope Obama’s followers now realize that the former president was completely wrong, and knowingly lying, when he told Mitt Romney that the threat of Russia was yesterday’s news and that Russia offered no threat to America at all in the 21st Century. And I hate to point out the actual and very real Russian collusion of Obama when he told the Russian Prime Minister, on an embarrassingly open mic, that he hoped Putin would give him time to get re-elected before he passed judgment on him. One wonders what Obama was afraid of with his admitted fear of Putin. Maybe the Russian president would have withheld a payment to Obama’s secret Swiss bank account for his favorable treatment toward Russia during his pro-Russian presidency.
At any rate, conservatives welcome Democrats to the 21st Century with the acknowledgement that Russia is a great threat to America and our ability to hold free elections which determine our political leaders, and not have to live as Russian’s are forced to do, with government-appointed Communist political and economic rulers.
MSNBC and CNN actually did the bidding of Russia when they advertised and helped assemble crowds for Russian-planned, anti-Trump and anti-Clinton demonstrations, some of which even resulted in buildings being burned and people being beaten, so a thinking person has to conclude that Democrat, leftist Fake News organizations were actively colluding with Russia, and we all know how liberals pretend to hate people who collude with Russia, right?
One hates to speak in contradiction of the leftist hero, Comrade Barack Obama, but after witnessing events lately that conclusively prove how involved Russia has been in our national elections, I hope Obama’s followers now realize that the former president was completely wrong, and knowingly lying, when he told Mitt Romney that the threat of Russia was yesterday’s news and that Russia offered no threat to America at all in the 21st Century. And I hate to point out the actual and very real Russian collusion of Obama when he told the Russian Prime Minister, on an embarrassingly open mic, that he hoped Putin would give him time to get re-elected before he passed judgment on him. One wonders what Obama was afraid of with his admitted fear of Putin. Maybe the Russian president would have withheld a payment to Obama’s secret Swiss bank account for his favorable treatment toward Russia during his pro-Russian presidency.
At any rate, conservatives welcome Democrats to the 21st Century with the acknowledgement that Russia is a great threat to America and our ability to hold free elections which determine our political leaders, and not have to live as Russian’s are forced to do, with government-appointed Communist political and economic rulers.
Thursday, February 22, 2018
When Supposed Adult, Responsible Teachers, Manipulate Children
When emotion overcomes logic, reason and experience, as is currently happening with some surviving students of last week’s Florida school shooting, teachers and parents should do all they can to soothe and calm them and appeal to reason and logic in handling their misery. Instead we’re seeing just another liberal form of child abuse, this time coming from the Democrat party. These already stressed-out young people who survived the shooting are being encouraged in their rage and their youthful emotional outbursts, via financial support from liberal Democrat donors, to march on the Florida legislature and demand an end to gun ownership in America. This type of mass, hysterical assembly was last seen when American liberals, at that time assembled by CNN and MSNBC broadcasts encouraging all good Democrat protesters to attend anti-Trump demonstrations and show their hate for him, were knowingly or unknowingly following the orders of Russians trying to undermine our system of governing ourselves. Liberal politicians were all over Donald Trump for the lie of Russian collusion, until it was learned that Russia placed the idea of protest marches where it would be fallen for by the most immature people: the liberal network press.
In western society it’s the adult role to explain to young people that emotion is not a path they want to follow or argue, and adults are supposed to help them understand the illogic of some of their positions’ emotional origins. Unfortunately, following the Florida shooting last week, the Democrat party moved immediately, efficiently and successfully (keep in mind the Russian bots that liberals allowed to trick them during and after the 2016 presidential election?) to organize survivors of the horrendous shooting, and paid for their transportation, food and lodging while they lectured the Tallahassee legislators with their leftist, gun control demands. One would be safe to doubt that the organizing Democrat functionaries would allow any young person to board the bus to the state capitol who wasn’t already persuaded to the left on the subject of gun control and an end to the second amendment protection of gun ownership.
Vladimir Putin would be proud of the Democrat attempts to get rid of self-defense weapons in America, because that’s exactly what happened in Russia as soon as the Communists took over that nation and began killing their opponents. Old Vlad, had he been in Florida last week, couldn’t have done a better job himself at organizing anti-American forces, and in fact one would not be surprised if he were not in collusion with a few leading Democrats and didn’t have a hand in this subversive scheme.
Although it’s completely understandable that the surviving Florida students would express emotions and insist on a stop to the killings, teachers and politicians alike should have explained the impossibility of halting such events in a free nation that has constitutional protection for gun ownership. However the teachers’ union is a slave to the Democrat party, so only political solutions favored by Democrats, aided by Russian bots, is what was allowed on the busses, and only leftist, emotional pleas were made to the Florida legislature.
One might well consider this treatment of students to be child abuse, and the Florida students were let down by teachers in their hour of need and distress.
In western society it’s the adult role to explain to young people that emotion is not a path they want to follow or argue, and adults are supposed to help them understand the illogic of some of their positions’ emotional origins. Unfortunately, following the Florida shooting last week, the Democrat party moved immediately, efficiently and successfully (keep in mind the Russian bots that liberals allowed to trick them during and after the 2016 presidential election?) to organize survivors of the horrendous shooting, and paid for their transportation, food and lodging while they lectured the Tallahassee legislators with their leftist, gun control demands. One would be safe to doubt that the organizing Democrat functionaries would allow any young person to board the bus to the state capitol who wasn’t already persuaded to the left on the subject of gun control and an end to the second amendment protection of gun ownership.
Vladimir Putin would be proud of the Democrat attempts to get rid of self-defense weapons in America, because that’s exactly what happened in Russia as soon as the Communists took over that nation and began killing their opponents. Old Vlad, had he been in Florida last week, couldn’t have done a better job himself at organizing anti-American forces, and in fact one would not be surprised if he were not in collusion with a few leading Democrats and didn’t have a hand in this subversive scheme.
Although it’s completely understandable that the surviving Florida students would express emotions and insist on a stop to the killings, teachers and politicians alike should have explained the impossibility of halting such events in a free nation that has constitutional protection for gun ownership. However the teachers’ union is a slave to the Democrat party, so only political solutions favored by Democrats, aided by Russian bots, is what was allowed on the busses, and only leftist, emotional pleas were made to the Florida legislature.
One might well consider this treatment of students to be child abuse, and the Florida students were let down by teachers in their hour of need and distress.
Liberal Emphasis On “Protection” Wouldn’t Save One Student’s Life
Liberal movies and television programs push the idea of “protection”, but not the kind of protection that could save even one life during a school shooting, nor protect a student body from mass deaths if a shooting started.
Very likely there were some students at the Florida high school that was attacked last week who had “protection” on them, but the kind of protection that they needed for active self-defense, like a pistol or a rifle in the possession of an actual protector, was completely missing, and contributed to the loss of 17 lives in Florida last week.
If students have the responsibility to protect themselves against STDs (and this form of “protection” is pushed by Hollywood liberals ad nauseam in ads and films), why can’t they, their parents, other adults or teachers, carry self-defense protection to prevent mass killings by insane people?
If liberals in the law-enforcement profession will not implement and enforce laws against crimes employing guns, and if they plea-bargain for lesser charges and in the process drop the gun charges, how are we going to keep gun-carrying nut cases from committing repeat crimes, and how can society intimidate border-line crazy people and prevent future gun crimes?
The lying, leftist press, in their usual attempt to defame President Trump and to politicize the gun issue, is claiming that there have been 18 school shootings in 2018! So in 50 days, we’ve had 18 school shootings? This is a total lie, and the proof of its untruth is that we have not been inundated by the same breathless, political reporting, 24/7, that we’ve seen since the Florida shootings last week. The lying press is reporting the 18 former events that they claim may have happened near or on school grounds. But if there have been this many actual school shootings in 2018, why are we only now hearing about them? Because this is just more Fake News from the liberal press.
Liberals are the cause of nearly any problem facing America, and the more serious the problem the more involvement liberals have in the issue‘s cause, and passing another law restricting gun ownership would just be another law that liberal prosecutors would plea bargain away in order to get an easy conviction on a lesser charge, and the law will therefore go unenforced, which is exactly the situation with laws already on the books. So why pass more laws that will only be a waste of paper and will not solve anything? And we also need law enforcement professionals like sheriff’s offices and the FBI to respond to reports of suspicious statements and actions as citizens recognize possible threats they discover in their daily lives.
But the situation is made worse by snot-nosed young people who only quote the Democrat party line drivel and who are probably supporters of Bernie Sanders to boot, telling us what legislation will stop the killings, when one of Bernie’s own followers shot a group of Republicans a few months ago, nearly killing one of them, as they assembled to play baseball in a Washington DC suburb. Liberals claim to have a “sensible’ solution to gun shootings, but I’ve found that people who lack “common sense” are unable to offer “sensible” solutions to anything.
Schools, and the young people who attend them, need real “protection”, not the symbolic kind that Hollywood likes to discuss because of its prurient attractiveness, and liberals have no idea how to provide such protection.
Very likely there were some students at the Florida high school that was attacked last week who had “protection” on them, but the kind of protection that they needed for active self-defense, like a pistol or a rifle in the possession of an actual protector, was completely missing, and contributed to the loss of 17 lives in Florida last week.
If students have the responsibility to protect themselves against STDs (and this form of “protection” is pushed by Hollywood liberals ad nauseam in ads and films), why can’t they, their parents, other adults or teachers, carry self-defense protection to prevent mass killings by insane people?
If liberals in the law-enforcement profession will not implement and enforce laws against crimes employing guns, and if they plea-bargain for lesser charges and in the process drop the gun charges, how are we going to keep gun-carrying nut cases from committing repeat crimes, and how can society intimidate border-line crazy people and prevent future gun crimes?
The lying, leftist press, in their usual attempt to defame President Trump and to politicize the gun issue, is claiming that there have been 18 school shootings in 2018! So in 50 days, we’ve had 18 school shootings? This is a total lie, and the proof of its untruth is that we have not been inundated by the same breathless, political reporting, 24/7, that we’ve seen since the Florida shootings last week. The lying press is reporting the 18 former events that they claim may have happened near or on school grounds. But if there have been this many actual school shootings in 2018, why are we only now hearing about them? Because this is just more Fake News from the liberal press.
Liberals are the cause of nearly any problem facing America, and the more serious the problem the more involvement liberals have in the issue‘s cause, and passing another law restricting gun ownership would just be another law that liberal prosecutors would plea bargain away in order to get an easy conviction on a lesser charge, and the law will therefore go unenforced, which is exactly the situation with laws already on the books. So why pass more laws that will only be a waste of paper and will not solve anything? And we also need law enforcement professionals like sheriff’s offices and the FBI to respond to reports of suspicious statements and actions as citizens recognize possible threats they discover in their daily lives.
But the situation is made worse by snot-nosed young people who only quote the Democrat party line drivel and who are probably supporters of Bernie Sanders to boot, telling us what legislation will stop the killings, when one of Bernie’s own followers shot a group of Republicans a few months ago, nearly killing one of them, as they assembled to play baseball in a Washington DC suburb. Liberals claim to have a “sensible’ solution to gun shootings, but I’ve found that people who lack “common sense” are unable to offer “sensible” solutions to anything.
Schools, and the young people who attend them, need real “protection”, not the symbolic kind that Hollywood likes to discuss because of its prurient attractiveness, and liberals have no idea how to provide such protection.
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
Are Our Assumptions About Federalism Mistaken?
It’s long been a staple of our federalist system of government that allowing the various states, and not the federal government, to decide policies and solutions to societal problems would allow the nation to test a range of fixes and see which one is the best solution to any given problem. Then, the assumption goes, all states would adopt the most efficient and best-working solution from all of the state examples, and the problem would be solved for all American citizens.
But were we wrong in these assumptions? For example: Does the mayor of Chicago admit that the liberal idea of strict gun ownership laws has failed as his city has become a kill zone, setting murder records each year? Does the governor of California, and the mayors of various cites in that state, recognize and admit that the killing of Kate Steinle was because of their idiotic sanctuary ideas that increasing numbers of Democrat politicians have been practicing? Do the California politicians not see the destruction to their state as citizens flee to other states that have fewer homeless people and lower taxes, where they can walk the streets of their neighborhoods and not fear being shot by an illegal alien or a drug-crazed addict?
Did Barack Obama learn from the socialized healthcare failure practiced in Massachusetts, which had escalating costs and poor service as its recommendation, before he mandated the same unworkable and unaffordable system on the entire nation? And have Democrats recognized the tragedy that Obamacare has been for those Americans forced to use it and do they express any regret for the ACA bill’s passage? And even with the expanding economy that has resulted from President Trump’s tax reduction plan, there are no Democrats I know of who will express surprise and pleasure at the success of this legislation and want to retain it forever, and even give more money back to the citizens who earned it so the economy can expand even further.
One can add to the list of non-workable, trendy, cool-sounding, leftist ideas, the proposal that we offer “sanctuary” to marijuana usage, in addition to the locales where pot smoking has already been locally approved. Oh, yes, the best way to serve the citizens of a city or a state is to give them another source of mind-bending, reality-distorting escape that leaves too many people unable to fully function in society and who eventually fall through the cracks and become fully dependent on Democrat politicians to provide them the bare subsistence they need in order to keep them voting the Democrat Party line.
And now we are told that each state must try its own plan to keep schools safe from mass shootings, with the winning idea to be implemented nationally as we see which idea is best at saving lives. The problem is that Liberal Democrats will never agree on a solution for anything that doesn’t give liberal politicians more control over citizens’ lives and that doesn’t take gun ownership rights from American citizens. The reason Democrats propose any policy is to maximize their power and their ability to make citizens subservient to them and their practice of handing out goodies in exchange for votes.
That’s the way it is, and that’s what Democrats do, and the only way to stop this leftward drift and the eventual denial of our constitution by leftist politicians, is to elect no more Democrats to any office in the nation. Democrat solutions to any problem are inevitably political and only serve the nefarious ends of big, intrusive government. Democrat solutions never solve problems, but only make them worse.
But were we wrong in these assumptions? For example: Does the mayor of Chicago admit that the liberal idea of strict gun ownership laws has failed as his city has become a kill zone, setting murder records each year? Does the governor of California, and the mayors of various cites in that state, recognize and admit that the killing of Kate Steinle was because of their idiotic sanctuary ideas that increasing numbers of Democrat politicians have been practicing? Do the California politicians not see the destruction to their state as citizens flee to other states that have fewer homeless people and lower taxes, where they can walk the streets of their neighborhoods and not fear being shot by an illegal alien or a drug-crazed addict?
Did Barack Obama learn from the socialized healthcare failure practiced in Massachusetts, which had escalating costs and poor service as its recommendation, before he mandated the same unworkable and unaffordable system on the entire nation? And have Democrats recognized the tragedy that Obamacare has been for those Americans forced to use it and do they express any regret for the ACA bill’s passage? And even with the expanding economy that has resulted from President Trump’s tax reduction plan, there are no Democrats I know of who will express surprise and pleasure at the success of this legislation and want to retain it forever, and even give more money back to the citizens who earned it so the economy can expand even further.
One can add to the list of non-workable, trendy, cool-sounding, leftist ideas, the proposal that we offer “sanctuary” to marijuana usage, in addition to the locales where pot smoking has already been locally approved. Oh, yes, the best way to serve the citizens of a city or a state is to give them another source of mind-bending, reality-distorting escape that leaves too many people unable to fully function in society and who eventually fall through the cracks and become fully dependent on Democrat politicians to provide them the bare subsistence they need in order to keep them voting the Democrat Party line.
And now we are told that each state must try its own plan to keep schools safe from mass shootings, with the winning idea to be implemented nationally as we see which idea is best at saving lives. The problem is that Liberal Democrats will never agree on a solution for anything that doesn’t give liberal politicians more control over citizens’ lives and that doesn’t take gun ownership rights from American citizens. The reason Democrats propose any policy is to maximize their power and their ability to make citizens subservient to them and their practice of handing out goodies in exchange for votes.
That’s the way it is, and that’s what Democrats do, and the only way to stop this leftward drift and the eventual denial of our constitution by leftist politicians, is to elect no more Democrats to any office in the nation. Democrat solutions to any problem are inevitably political and only serve the nefarious ends of big, intrusive government. Democrat solutions never solve problems, but only make them worse.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Can People Who Lack “Common Sense” Propose “Sensible” Solutions?
Allow me to list several things currently being proposed by liberal Democrats:
1. Open our borders to all Syrians, Mexicans, Norwegians and Central Americans with no restrictions.
2. Establish sanctuary cities and states where illegal alien criminals can seek refuge from Federal Law.
3. Allow a thick-necked, bearded, over-weight man to self-identify as a female, Japanese, ballet dancer. And then pretend this man is not out of his mind.
4. Pass a mandatory Affordable Care Act whose monthly premiums bankrupt middle class Americans, and whose deductibles are too costly to even use.
5. Allow men into women’s and girl’s restrooms.
6. Let one political party pay for a false document alleging criminal acts on the part of their political opponents, and then have the FBI knowingly pass this document to a FISA court for approval to investigate and surveil the other political party in order to entrap them.
Do these ideas make “sense” to you? Are these things in keeping with free elections and a rule by law under a constitution? The answer, of course, is NO. These are unreasonable, nonsense things only done in dictatorships or banana republics, but these things have been done by America’s Democrat party. And I’d say that any people or party with a track record like this is incapable of “sensible” solutions to any problem, especially a problem as difficult as the prevention of mass school shootings.
1. Open our borders to all Syrians, Mexicans, Norwegians and Central Americans with no restrictions.
2. Establish sanctuary cities and states where illegal alien criminals can seek refuge from Federal Law.
3. Allow a thick-necked, bearded, over-weight man to self-identify as a female, Japanese, ballet dancer. And then pretend this man is not out of his mind.
4. Pass a mandatory Affordable Care Act whose monthly premiums bankrupt middle class Americans, and whose deductibles are too costly to even use.
5. Allow men into women’s and girl’s restrooms.
6. Let one political party pay for a false document alleging criminal acts on the part of their political opponents, and then have the FBI knowingly pass this document to a FISA court for approval to investigate and surveil the other political party in order to entrap them.
Do these ideas make “sense” to you? Are these things in keeping with free elections and a rule by law under a constitution? The answer, of course, is NO. These are unreasonable, nonsense things only done in dictatorships or banana republics, but these things have been done by America’s Democrat party. And I’d say that any people or party with a track record like this is incapable of “sensible” solutions to any problem, especially a problem as difficult as the prevention of mass school shootings.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)