A
liberal Democrat mouthpiece appeared on Fox News recently and said
that Chiefs of Police across America support sanctuary cities as a
good policy to practice for illegal aliens, and she did not exclude
people who are suspects of actual crimes from being protected by this
bad liberal idea of sanctuary.
I’d
like to test this great idea for handling people illegally in our
nation: Do Chiefs of Police across the nation believe that American
citizens suspected of crimes should receive shelter from their
crimes? If not, why not? And what’s the difference between alien
criminals and citizen criminals? Why give non-citizens more
consideration and forgiveness for their crimes than we give a
citizen?
Only
Democrats, who look at race, ethnicity and gender before they engage
their minds and consider facts and logic, would expound in favor of
giving sanctuary to people known to be suspects of crimes, and when
caught supporting such idiotic policy, they double down and claim to
want more of the same misguided behavior.
The
truth is in direct contradiction to what liberals believe and try to
convince the nation of: If a nation enforces its laws and doesn’t
allow criminals to hide from the law, the nation ends up being a
safer place to live and raise a family. It may be the case that some
Chiefs of Police, in sanctuary cities, favor the idea of sanctuary,
but it’s only to protect their jobs, and the cities they represent
are doubtless run by liberal Democrat mayors and the city is probably
swamped by crime, like Chicago, for exactly the loony left idea that
criminals should be lightly punished, if they are punished at all.
