Statement from the Candidate
In 2010 I ran an unsuccessful campaign for the United States Congress, but I'm still posting blogs that I believe express an opinion that most other people miss, and that I also believe can make America great again and cast off the yoke of liberal/progressive control that is currently in place.
Sunday, January 28, 2018
The Liberal Press Abuses The Constitution
The liberal press has chosen to not report news that’s not to their liking, but the Constitution does not allow them to make this choice. It assumes that all of the news will be reported honestly by impartial reporters, so if they don’t report stories unflattering about Hillary Clinton, they are disobeying the constitution.
The other side of the argument is that when they lie they are not reporting any news at all, so they should be legally vulnerable for this continued practice after a year of being proven wrong on so many negative stories about Donald Trump. For a listing of some of these false news stories see Trump’s 2017 Fake News Award Winners.
One example of the news that the press refuses to print is a photo released recently that shows Senator Barack Obama smiling and grinning alongside racist and Islamist Louis Farrakhan following a meeting with the Congressional Black Caucus in 2005. The picture was buried and never seen by the public because the Democrats and the liberal press knew it could hurt Obama’s political career. The same could be said about negative aspects of Obamacare that the press never reported, nor did the lying press remind us of all of the times Obama lied about what the Obamacare bill would and would not include. And how about the racist and anti-American rages of Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and the murderer Bill Ayers, both of whom were instrumental in Obama’s political career. With Obama surrounded by this rogue’s gallery of crooks, how else could he have turned out other than the anti-American radical he was and is?
Water Cronkite used to close each of his news reports by saying “and that’s the way it is”. But now we know that the way he reported and the things he reported were not “the way it was”, his reports were probably 50 percent lies, and today we have sources that can keep us informed to the obvious lies of the leftist press. So if we know they tell lies on a regular basis, why can’t we use the constitution to remove their right and ability to keep lying and getting away with it? I’m just asking.